> they unironically don't take advantage of their AMD GPU to turn their videos into 60FPS without breaking a sweat on the CPU and they rely on buggy software like SVP to do it more inefficiently.
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
Get fucked linux cucks.
>>58634794
I don't need more buggy shit crashing my computer.
>>58634820
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
It's purely a hardware feature faggot.
It's the least buggy method possible.
>AYYYYYYYYMD
Lol so its just frame interpolation
>>58634845
It's pretty solid though because it's done hardware side. It's very crisp and extremely responsible.
SVP is full of artifacts, especially when skipping.
SVP can be better sometimes but this is neat.
>>58634794
MadVR has done this for years.
>>58634855
>responsible
*responsive
>>58634856
Don't be retarded. madVR does not do full interpolation to produce high FPS. it just blends some frames in a way to make it less irritating sometimes, while it keeps the FPS low.
The actual alternative to this is SVP, but it has heavy resources needs and it's quirky, and the shills that make it start asking for money lately for the full feature set.
>>58634894
It does 60 FPS. That's now low FPS.
works with mpv?
>>58635004
I guess it does on Windows. Doesn't it take DirectShow filters?
It will not run on linux.
maybe wine?