>required extremely careful manufacture, almost always carried out by hand in spite of repeated major efforts to automate the process
why was is so hard to automate this?
weaving has been automated centuries ago
>>58630183
>why was is so hard to automate this?
before they made an efficient process for manufacturing core memory, transistors became widely used
>>58630183
Flexible materials have infinite degrees of freedom.
They did automate it. Apollo spacecraft had rope memory that was knitted by machine that took in punch cards
I still have no clue how core memory functioned.
>>58630289
flipping one of the magnet's fields would cause current to flow in another wire
if one of the cores is already flipped, no current flows
since a read causes a core to flip, you need to re-write the memory after every read
>>58630281
>infinite degrees of freedom
You don't understand what degrees of freedom are. Stop saying terms you don't understand.
>>58630314
>blibby blabby magnets
Just tell me "magic" next time.
>>58630352
bruh just take physics I and II in college
>>58630323
Wires and flexible cables are best modelled as a continuum
>>58630183
This looks more like a toy a kid would make with a science and crafts kit than computing machinery
>>58630458
These things are fucking tiny
>>58630323
he's right though
>>58630458
>>58630468
relatively speaking, of course
as far as hand-made goes, they're pretty tiny
I've always wanted to DIY core memory, then I think about how much of a bitch it'd be
>>58630205
It was used for 20 years actually