So what moron thought it was a good idea that the whole system

>>58573888
Hold up, your system shouldn't boot if one entry isn't valid? Do you mean an "essential" entry (/ or something) or any? Because I've had a few messed up fstab entries for my Windows partition but it didn't stop me from booting. Or is this a recent change?

>>58573888
>cease booting
You mean hang for about 3 seconds?

>>58573888
fstab is for essential partitions

the actual morons are the arch wiki people who tell you to mount nfs/cifs(etc) shit from there

>>58574018
ur mum has an essential partition , m8

>>58574018
It depends, if by "essentail" you mean the bare minimum partitions -aka / /boot and maybe swap- then no.
If you mean the partitions you need for the computer does it's job -say you have a media server and your media files are in another physical disk- then yes.

>>58573888
but fanboys love systemd right? is not just just the developers shilling right?

>>58574018
Where's the proper location to mount these?

>>58573888

Tips confirm.

SystemD fanboys hate themselves and Lennart has been bought by the NSA.

Add
nofail
to the mount options of that device. This will enable your computer to boot even if the device fails to mount.

>>58573888
>not using modern and utalitarian OpenRC
it's like you deserve to be spied on by Lennart
no but in all seriousness I would punch Lennart in the face too, he looks like an autistic child

File: Lennart_Putitinme.jpg (54KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 800x530px

>>58573888
>>58574954
>>58575020

this isn't specific to systemd

File: creatorofaidsdiabetesandcancer.png (213KB, 299x401px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 299x401px

>>58575710

File: durr.png (373KB, 960x1062px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 960x1062px

>>58573888
You are just doing it wrong.

>>58575888
>/G/'s most prolific systemd apologist makes an appearance

Coincidentally also a tripfag

>>58576015
You shouldn't use fstab at all.
systemd.mount files are better.

how is it systemd's fault you didn't use the option "noauto" on mounts not critical to boot?

>>58573888
>So what moron thought it was a good idea that the whole system should cease booting if a single fstab entry is no longer valid?
not sure, but it wasn't lennart

>>58576708
or nofail

>>58576723
yea

File: record-2017-01-20_11.53.31.webm (444KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 1920x1080px

Or you just don't use fstab because it sucks.

webm related, inotify based automounting of sshfs that is way cleaner than using fstab

>>58576779
>bu.. bu.. but I'm so weak so Plzzz Lennart fuck my ass because I can't into
FUCKING FSTAB

>>58576857
I'd like to see these systemd haters that bitch about how it handles fstab sanely actually give an example of a clean way to do it with only fstab.

There isn't one lol.

>>58573888
fstab has nothing to do with systemd
certainly the fstab configuration must be correct
bu5t it is not the fault of systemd if you
ruin fstab

>>58574292
your post just made me feel like molesting nuns andvicars and your grandad
because you are a stupid moron

File: nun.jpg (707KB, 1600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 1600x1000px

>>58576997
Molesting nuns is kinda fun though.