[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

>Buy overclockable 1440p IPS monitor in early 2012 for $295

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 27
Thread images: 5

File: imgres.jpg (4KB, 276x183px) Image search: [Google]
imgres.jpg
4KB, 276x183px
>Buy overclockable 1440p IPS monitor in early 2012 for $295
>it gets broken last week in move
>go to buy a new one
>Overclockable 1440p monitors are now 375-400+

What the fuck? Why has this not gotten cheaper after 5 years?
>>
>>58536655
Companies keep supplies low to maintain high prices, ofc
>>
>>58536695
>>
>>58536695

But the supply of Korean panels seems pretty high.
>>
>>58536655
gaymans discovered 1440p due more powerful GPUs
>>
File: 1467506942114.png (406KB, 570x806px) Image search: [Google]
1467506942114.png
406KB, 570x806px
My catleap I paid $330 for about 5 years ago is probably an even better purchase than my i5 2500k. That's how good it is.

Whole time faggots on this board were saying this shit would die in a year.
>>
>>58536655
overclockable? like the refresh rate?
>>
>>58537085
Yeah, these panels could be adjusted up to 90-110hz without issues.
>>
>>58537150
>>58537085

I got $260 Shimian Achieva up to 100hz. The same monitor now would be like $500.
>>
>>58537150
>>58537165
And my expensive Dell UH2715H can't do this?
>>
kek I noticed this last year when my HP monitor from 2007 died.
Bought two cheap Acer monitors and with cheap I mean that each one costs the same as what the HP did years back in 2007.
Image quality, viewer angles etc isnt even that better.
>>
>>58537223
The panel used in the Korean ones is the same lg panel that was in the $999 Apple cinema display, but the Koreans used a different board that allowed higher refresh rates.
>>
>>58536655
>Omg price went up as demand got higher!
You have to be 18 to view this site.
>>
>>58537297

Those Korean 1440p panels were super hot back then. I'd say demand is likely down.
>>
>>58536655

>Whining about a $400 monitor

Get a job?
>>
>>58537223

Because your expensive UH2715H is a high quality panel that actually passed QA and also has good power delivery.

These retards and their Korean garbage monitors are buying factory reject panels that failed QA attached to thermonuclear detonators pretending to by power supplies.

When you see their house burning down on local news, know your spending more for a proper monitor saved you from it.
>>
>>58537223
the cheap korean monitors use panels that didn't pass QA from samsung or LG, and they use a really simple controller board that only has one input (usually dual link DVI) and no OSD. only one brightness setting, sometimes only support native resolution. the simpler the board is, the better it will overclock.
>>
>>58537581

I'd rather not
>>
File: Autism.png (26KB, 175x166px) Image search: [Google]
Autism.png
26KB, 175x166px
>>58538516
>>
File: 00060what.png (186KB, 332x512px) Image search: [Google]
00060what.png
186KB, 332x512px
>>58537280
The panels are shit compared to what you'd see in a good display. I know because before I got my 5k display I had a 1440p Qnix. The colors were good but the contrast was shit. It also had terrible IPS glow.
>>
>>58538670
Also the colors were "good" as in they weren't shit. They certainly weren't anywhere near what you'd get with a high quality display.
>>
OVERCLOCKING DESTROY MONITORS
>>
>>58538670
>>58538681

They were actually quite good for the first couple years. Around 2014 they started replacing the panels with shitty ones and quality went down.
>>
>>58537150
Nah they just drop frames
>>
File: s-l300.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
s-l300.jpg
15KB, 300x300px
Is this some kind of industry standard?
>>
>>58539440
No they don't.
>>
>>58539440

Some newer ones do. Most don't.
Thread posts: 27
Thread images: 5


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.