Now that Microsoft released UEFI backdoor keys to remotely exploit

>>58517464
Because it's convenient I don't care what happens to me

>>58517464
Bait / 10

It's like you're trying to be edgy, but failing.

>>58517494
>Bait
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3106726/windows/golden-keys-that-unlock-windows-secure-boot-protection-uncovered.html

File: 686f006b6d99b576f18f69d1f379c99bd4a179d5c51b28d732629b41cd89150a.jpg (32KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 400x400px

>>58517464
I'm gonna need some source there son.

>>58517529
"“The jailbreak technique described in the researchers’ report on August 10 does not apply to desktop or enterprise PC systems. It requires physical access and administrator rights to ARM and RT devices and does not compromise encryption protections.”"

(You) tried...

>>58517532
>>58517529

>>58517557
The question is, why those "golden keys" even exist?

>>58520052
> Encryption - How does it work?!

Who the hell uses secure boot anyway?

>>58524010
I do, its nice if you have a laptop and have self-signed certificates. It keeps my pre-bootloader tamper-free, which means I can be less paranoid about typing in the bootloader decryption key, which subsequently decrypts the main bootloader which will then automatically decrypt my root partition. I've got a perfect, tamper resistant chain of security.