ITT Post your network speeds. I installed a new modem today and

File: not the greatest.png (48KB, 703x64px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 703x64px

Not the greatest, but enough for me

File: firefox_2017-01-15_21-54-43.png (84KB, 703x118px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 703x118px

Recently moved to a new house that provided internet over ethernet directly, so no modems here. Of course there's something downstairs in some rack somewhere. Pleased!

19,90€ / month.

File: speedtest.png (32KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x135px

you guys have shit upload

>>58501702
>ITT Post your network speeds.
No thanks NSA.

File: 20170115_150337.png (162KB, 1440x2479px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1440x2479px

my facebook/Netflix device

File: wat.webm (294KB, 406x300px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 406x300px

>>58501939

>>58501937
I have 150/150mbps on my home connection. Not all burgers have shit internet.

>>58502151
how much do you pay for that?
do you have caps?

>>58502181
$75 a month (for reference a 1 bedroom apartment costs ~$1,000-1,5000 a month here)
And no data caps I've used over 4TB in a month without any warnings or complaints from my ISP

>>58501937
I definitely have shit upload but I'm not complaining because I don't really need it. I'm not a Twitch streamer and I don't seed torrents. My down is 100Mbps and that's good enough for me.

>>58501901
Oh also no caps. Don't live in a third world internet country.

>>58502267
rent has fuck-all to do with internet costs

i pay €35 for 100/100 (€370/mo rent if you for some reason think it's relevant)

>>58502310
i wouldnt either teebeeaytch, but your upload is still more than enough for streaming if you wanted

>>58501937
What do I need uploads for? Don't seed so much anime, man.

>>58502355
lets you host your own stuff, and is nice for transferring files to other people or just uploading anything in general

1Gb down 100Mb up here. Get it for free with work

File: 1458057411967.png (61KB, 1269x962px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1269x962px

My cat is not at all pleased with the flat ethernet line affixed to the floor.

>>58501702
>I installed a new modem today
>new modem
>today
What the actual fuck? Do people still use modems? I haven't had one since before I got my broadband connection 20 years ago.

>>58502375
I just do that on a VPS. I don't have anyone who I need to transfer files to that quickly. Just.. slap it on the VPS or onedrive or something.

>>58502343
>rent has fuck-all to do with internet costs
>i pay €35 for 100/100 (€370/mo rent if you for some reason think it's relevant)
Lol you're actually a retard. We will.

Okay so basic fucking economics for you. If you live in a well off highly populated city or suburb, the cost of living is SIGNIFICANTLY higher than a rural area of the country. My fellow American countrymen living in the middle of Nebraska for example would be paying $50-75 a month for 25mbps internet (if he's lucky) and $300-500/month rent.
Because no one wants to live in Nebraska even if he wanted to pay $300 a month for Internet, he's stuck with 1 provider.

When I declare my rent it's so others can recognize my particular region is VERY expensive compared to most areas and as such has a much bigger demand for fast Internet, and the population density to support fiber infrastructure.

>>58502634
I live in Oslo and the Internet prices are the same anywhere in the city. I happen to live in the very expensive area, and I pay the same for Internet as someone who lives in the African immigrant area.

File: Screenshot_20170116-075724.png (829KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

829KB, 1080x1920px

>>58501937
Do I have the works upload/download ratio here?

File: 1442101843495.gif (864KB, 160x270px) Image search: [Google]

864KB, 160x270px

>>58502634
yeah, the internet prices here in the 1st world dont depend on your fucking rent you retarded shit.
you can get 200Mbit in the bigger cities here where the rent is much higher, and you still pay less than €40 for internet

>>58502777
>phone
try a real computer

>>58502725
Yes I realize for a socialist European country it's less of a factor.

We have 300M citizens stretched over a MASSIVE chunk of land. If I drive straight for 40 hours at 100kph, I would have gone from 1 end of the country to the other. If you drive 40 hours at even 50kph you'll end up several countries away.

The US is large and the middle is sparsely populated. Cost for rent is actually a decent indicator of if someone will have good internet or not, of course there are excepections to this, but it mostly holds true.

>>58502798
The speed is still the same. I pay $120 aud for 100/2 with a 500gb cap.

>>58502810
we have lower population density in scandinavia than you

>>58502833
is that via the mobile phone network or the regular landline network?

>>58502851
Cable, EURODOCIS 3.0. I'm in Australia.

>>58502810
So different in Australia. I have expensive data capped 100/2 and my house is worth more than 4 million dollars. My friend lives in a small apartment and he gets 100/40 unlimited for $80. Another lives in a penthouse and can only get adsl1. People with shitty houses in the country are getting better internet first here.

>>58502834
Lol as a whole sure. Look at the middle of the US and look at the population density of those states.

Scandinavia has an overall population density of 22/km
We have 15 state below that not including Alaska.

Hell 4 or 5 states have population density around 4-6 people per km.

File: speed.png (40KB, 710x64px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 710x64px

It used to be 800-900 until I turned on Netflow, which disables hardware accelecation.
All traffic hits the CPU now.

>>58502931
rent still doesnt have jack shit to do with internet cost, you're being jewed for no reason

>>58502931
On the other side of the spectrum new jersey is sitting at over 1200 people per km

>>58202810
My friend in the shitty flat lives five mins away from a data centre were I get a vps with gigabit and 3tb data for $5 a month.

>>58502957
The entire country is being jewed. That's obvious and has nothing to do with my argument.

I might be getting jewed compared to you, but $75/month for 150/150mbps is DIRT cheap compared to 75% of the country.

So by your standards sure, by US standards I'm basically 2 steps from Google fiber levels of Internet which is the current holy grail of Internet in the US.

>>58503003
you still havent showed how rent has anything to do with your internet costs

http://testmy.net/compID/1709660634652

>>58503023
If you were paying attention I did.

In the United states since the only place with highly developed internet are the east and west coast (besides the smaller fiber projects spread throughout the country), the places on the coasts with good internet tend to have an increased cost of living (mainly housing), there are some exceptions, as there always are, but as a whole if your rent is decently expensive you can assume at least halfway decent internet.

File: Screenshot_2017-01-16-00-54-40.jpg (77KB, 397x411px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 397x411px

Upload speed is capped hard in my country.

>>58505511

>>58502777
Worse for me. Yes, this is on wifi.

File: 5970209048[1].png (31KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x135px

AT&T sucks. I'm not even in 30% range of the speed I paid for :(

File: 5970292274.png (31KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x135px

Australia lol, Best I've ever gotten is 19/0.9 Which is pretty much maxing out ADSL2, and I only reckon I got that because Im 300metres from the local telephone exchange

>>58506467
more than likely your NIC or router desu senpai :^)

>>58507227
ADSL2+ can technically hit 24/3mbps but i've never seen it myself.

File: Fuck TWC.png (31KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x135px

>tfw your internet is on par with AUS internet

File: 2016-08-19 08_29_31-.png (24KB, 292x124px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 292x124px

>>58508728
kek, bet you wish that FiOS rollout happened

>>58508742
I wish it was happening faster, i don't want to give my money to this shitty company anymore

>>58508822
>happening faster
They stopped any future expansion from what i've heard, I don't believe they do any more laying fiber at the moment, except hooking up new newly constructed neighborhoods in existing fiber areas they already own.

File: Screenshot from 2017-01-15 23-04-55.png (104KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1366x768px

>>58501702
kek my wifi is on par with some of you guys speed

File: Screenshot_1.png (79KB, 687x112px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 687x112px

>>58501702
60$/month

>>58508845
You cant be fucking serious

>>58508895
Yup, they plan to upgrade existing infrastructure in the 2020s with NGPON-X which is 40/40gbps per 64 households. But as far as I am aware they stopped all expansion efforts.

>>58508992
Oh boy 4 years more unless i decide to move

>>58501937
Download: 928.05Mb/s
Upload: 937.53Mb/s

File: 12445849.jpg (27KB, 703x124px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 703x124px

WEW WEW WEW

File: wtf.png (78KB, 991x351px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 991x351px

Any other ausfags here on Telstra noticed a drop in speed? 20/5/2016 was when they sent us a new modem/router, but for some reason we've been throttled?

File: internet.png (46KB, 697x64px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 697x64px

Dorm internet is bretty gud

File: 5817508139.png (32KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x135px

>>58501702

>>58501939
Implying the NSA doesn't already know but doesn't care

File: speed d3.jpg (63KB, 1475x495px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1475x495px

guys am I too late ??

File: 5971927179.png (31KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x135px

tfw live in rural area with gigabit available but its too expensive

File: 5971940177.png (32KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x135px

i share gigabit

File: 2017-01-16 11_50_43-Internet Providers in 30540 (Ellijay, GA) & Cable_TV Companies – Decision Data.png (7KB, 305x143px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 305x143px

>>58514684
No one in your area has gigabit

They might call it gigabit, but literally no one in your area is connecting with a 1gbps connection.

>>58514717
I would be interested in where you got these figures from

File: Screenshot[2305843009213698893].png (29KB, 345x500px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 345x500px

>>58501702
I sold my soul to the Google

>>58514790
http://decisiondata.org/

More than likely your ISP offers UP to 1gbps, but the actual 1gbps speeds are only available in other service areas, your area is probably capped around 150mbps

>>58502521
Uhhhhhh....wot?

>>58514717
>>58514855


You pulled the wrong area the speedtest server is hosted in GA but I actually live near moncks corner, SC which has full fiber to home. I did the test on the GA server to get away from my ISP's own hosted speedtest server. I don't doubt they could do 1gbps

File: speedtest.jpg (26KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 300x135px

>>58501702
>speedtest servers too slow

>>58514980
Fair enough, $150 is a bit expensive for 1gbps, especially since looking online most users end up with 1/2 to 2/3rds that speed.

>>58514985
th-that's in megabytes?

>>58514985
more likely your NIC or some link in-between.

>>58514985
testmy.net is infinitely better

>>58515180
1887 Mbps = 236 Megabytes per second

>>58515215
I probably tried 5 different servers before finding one that's not limited to 1Gbps.

File: 1479049473374.jpg (134KB, 569x768px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 569x768px

>>58503025
what year do you live in?

>ALL THESE KRAUTS PAYING 20 EUROBUX FOR GIGABIT
REEEEEEEEE
FUCKING TELSTRA, 90 BUCKS A MONTH FOR BLOODY 18MEGABITS
NOT TO MENTION MY DATA CAP

File: muhspeed.png (47KB, 694x64px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 694x64px

:(

>>58515246
>I probably tried 5 different servers before finding one that's not limited to 1Gbps.
I dont doubt that

But assuming you're on a 5 or 10gbps connection (it would be pretty rare to see 2gbps at least from my experiences it usually goes 1/5/10gbps), then you're still going to be limited by the server, your NIC, their NIC, or some switch in between you.

>>58502833
>500GB cap a month
Jesus Christ dude, just from Youtube and general DL alone I consume 100GB of Data on a day.

>>58515519
don't be jealous, in Europe it really depends where you live, if you have cable you can getup to 300 Mbits up&down, if copper than max ~50 Mbits down and 25 up (but this is changing, isps want to up this to 120 Mbits using some special method that has worked in trials), if fiber you get the gigabits speed but where I live - NL, the coverage is pretty much nil with maybe one or 2 neighborhoods in the city I live at least having fiber

usually the older your neighborhood the slower the internet, since the end point is at the home and the big home corporations hate having to spend money to replace their lines, most people don't own the places they live in after all

File: reeeeeeeeeee.jpg (18KB, 693x58px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 693x58px

This is on wifi but the wired connection is only ~5 mbps faster on download and .5 mbps faster upload.

Are there certain settings I can change to make this faster? We pay for 100 mbps download speeds. The router I use is a newer 1900ACS

>>58515766
Probably modem limited

File: tumblr_inline_n4upug5Wj41qhnlhk.jpg (99KB, 500x395px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 500x395px

>>58515776
I'd have to go look at it to see model # but i'm pretty sure it's less than 2 years old.

Th-thanks Spectrum. Fiber internet won't come here anytime soon.

>>58515805
Yeah your router is about as advanced as it gets for consumers at the moment

dual core 1.6Ghz CPU, 512MB RAM, beam forming, etc etc.

So it's either the connection itself, or the modem.

>>58515864
Looked into my modem. It's supposed to support download of up to 340 mbps and upload 120 mbps.

Guess i'll just call up charter and complain.

>>58516263
Yeah if your modem is DOCSIS 3.0 with 8 downstream links and 4 upstream links, you SHOULD be able to get much higher speeds than you are.

However if you're a significant distance from the CMTS, your speeds can be reduced even if the CMTS is getting full speeds.

>>58515766

go to 192.168.100.1 and check out the signals on your modem.

snr should be above 30
ds Rx should be -10 to +10 (closer to 0 the better)
us Tx should be 30 to 55

these are general "guidelines" and might vary according to your ISP. either way, they can look at everything your modem has been doing signal wise and determine if there are any problems.

>>58516337

not really true, doesn't matter how far you are like it does with DSL.

File: Capture.png (77KB, 604x638px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 604x638px

>>58516444
Not him, but I assume this is good right?

Can't seem to find anything other than SNR, though.

I got a new modem and my speeds are MUCH better, but my router is the same. It's not bad, but it's not good either. It's a NETGEAR WNDR3700. Got new wireless adapters too. Seemed to help overall.

Went from around 20 Mbps to 100 Mbps on wireless. Anything else I can do? I'm wondering if upgrading my router will do anything. Only noticeable difference I could tell is newer software. Mine still has the old control panel that's very limited and annoying to use. If it even works. Don't know how big of an impact it'll make.

Was thinking about getting Google Wifi since at least their control panel works.

>>58514985
>reposting a speedtest from 33c3

wew

>>58516729
>WNDR3700
Not the greatest hardware, single core 800MHz CPU, 128MB RAM. and only up to 802.11N, not 802.11AC

A faster CPU and more RAM can potentially allow for more simultaneous devices doing large data transfers and not getting chocked up.

File: you don't say.jpg (17KB, 600x373px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 600x373px

As per usual it's:
>eastern euros bragging about the literal single thing good about any of their countries
>australians saying "fucking <isp> cunts"
>amerilards either getting ultra jewed on speeds/caps or ultra jewed on price

>>58517230
>amerilards either getting ultra jewed on speeds/caps or ultra jewed on price
besides Verizon FiOS bros or Google fiber bros. And a few other small fiber projects.

I'm running about 2 mbps /2mbps shared with 30 people with about 800 ms ping. That's for $150 per day. Talk about jewing.

>>58517422
wut

>>58517619
this

>>58517619
>>58517634
Satilite internet to a work vessel in the Gulf of Mexico.

>>58517680
figured it must have been something like that for the ping, and honestly 800ms isn't half bad for satellite.

File: 1479593750911.png (797KB, 812x806px) Image search: [Google]

797KB, 812x806px

>>58517257
>Verizon FiOS Bros
Its 270 burgerbucks a month for 500/500 fiber here
>t-thanks "bro"

>>58518637
Yeah but it's only $75 for 150/150.

$65 for 100/100
$55 for 50/50

The only stupid prices start after that.

300/300 is $180
500/500 is $299. (the 270 price is only for a few months, normal is $299)

Anyone know if google fiber is rolling out to more cities this year?

File: Screen Shot 2017-01-16 at 22.29.49.png (132KB, 600x272px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 600x272px

Had 1000kb/s before so this is heaven.

>>58516737
:^)

Not a repost though, speedtest of my NAS with 10G in the yolocolo.