Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: logos.png (33KB, 460x300px)
33KB, 460x300px
Windows
Pros
>Professional content creators use it
>Pretty much all consumers use it
>Has the right amount of advancement, and the right amount of ease of use at the same time
Cons
>Viruses
>Not retard proof
>Costs ~$100 to buy an install disc
>Can get slow over time
Linux
Pros
>Maintains speed over time
>Mainly used by businesses
>IT uses it
>Fucking insane customization options compared to Windows
>Top notch emulation
>Major businesses use it for server use (and/or desktop use)
Cons
>Viruses
>Not that many programs for desktop Linux
>Said programs are either outdated, horribly made or laggy
>GTK+3
>No easy way of installing things from browser
>Normies won't catch on to sudo apt-get install (blank)
>Not a very great OS for productive and professionals
Mac
>Built for businessmen and retards,
>Has a nice balance between Windows and Linux compatibility
>Not much you can do to customize it
>Multiple ways to install programs
Cons
>Underpowered machines
>Barely any Windows apps ported to Mac
>You're pretty much going to get made fun of it on /g/ no matter what
>Viruses yet again
>No option to dual-boot Linux
>LITERALLY NO OTHER PORTS OTHER THAN USB TYPE C
>>
gr8 b8 m8
8/8
>>
>>58493903
>Linux
>viruses
>>
>gr8 b8 m8
>8/8
>>
>>58493912
https://blogs.sophos.com/2015/03/26/dont-believe-these-four-myths-about-linux-security/
>>
>>58493923
>Nowadays, the number of threats goes way beyond getting a malware infection. Just think about receiving a phishing email or ending up on a phishing website. Does using a Linux-based operating system prevent you from giving up your personal or bank information? Not at all.
I kekked louder than I should. Reminds me of Microsoft advertising that Edge is safer than Chrome because it protects more against social engineer attacks.
>>
>>58493923
>One common objection to installing antivirus is that it can affect the machine’s performance. Fortunately, Sophos Antivirus for Linux has a small footprint and minimal impact on system speed.
The whole point of that article was to scare retards into buying their security products.
>>
File: IMG_2783.jpg (45KB, 365x420px) Image search:
[Google]
45KB, 365x420px
>says normies wont get Debian's shitty package manager
>never even referenced Pacman or Portage.
>>
>>58493903
Mac
>Built for businessmen and retards,
It's not really specifically built for anyone.
>Has a nice balance between Windows and Linux compatibility
Uh... do you mean you can install WINE?
>Not much you can do to customize it
It's BSD, so that's wrong.
>Multiple ways to install programs
You can use a CLI package manager like Homebrew, a .pkg file, or you can just drag the .app files to the Applications directory.
>Underpowered machines
Hackintosh.
>Barely any Windows apps ported to Mac
You can install WINE.
>You're pretty much going to get made fun of it on /g/ no matter what
Good. I don't care what /g/ thinks of me.
>Viruses yet again
Every OS has this problem.
>No option to dual-boot Linux
I have Debian installed. I just put the image on a flash drive, held down the option key, booted into the flash drive, and installed it. It was really easy.
>LITERALLY NO OTHER PORTS OTHER THAN USB TYPE C
Well, looking at the side of my machine I see Magsafe, ethernet, FireWire, Thunderbolt, two USB A ports, an SD slot, and a 3.5 mm headphone jack.
>>
>>58493903
wow this really made me think
>>
>>58494114
>wow this really made me think
A new experience, eh?
Relish it while it lasts.
>>
>>58494104
Why aren't Garageband, Final Cut Pro etc ported to Windows?
>>
File: 1476447363172.jpg (217KB, 644x1049px) Image search:
[Google]
217KB, 644x1049px
>>58496000
Because they're trash, and even Apple doesn't want to use that shit.
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3