http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews /nvidia-gtx-1050-ti-pass

File: 26094659309l.jpg (140KB, 800x320px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 800x320px

So?

https://www.overclock3d.net/news/gpu_displays/xfx_readies_a_fanless_rx_460_gpu/1

>>58421020

Well, the one from the OP is actually a good GPU.

Well fuck, I just recently bought a 1050, wish I'd known

>>58421089
Theyre about the same, performance wise
The best 1050ti's and best rx 460's are pretty evenly matched

Much better than what the 750ti did to amd last time
Rip

>>58421020
>xfx
Yuck. I don't care how much their 480 is shilled by reviewers. That company fucked up way too many times to be taken seriously anymore.

File: sure bruh.jpg (122KB, 826x631px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 826x631px

>>58421126

>Theyre about the same, performance wise

k

>>58421181
1050 Ti is near pointless as upgrading to a 470 (maybe 1060 if they do a big rebate) is best. Vanilla 1050 or 460 is pretty shit even for the most thrifty of budget gaming builds.

I'd rather pickup a used 970 card for 120-150 tbqh

>>58421147
Explain?
My XFX 280x has been pretty great

>>58421181
b-but DOOM

>>58421401

>1050 Ti is near pointless...

Well performance wise maybe but it looks like it's a very fast passively cooled option.

>>58421020
I'd like to know what material they use there that makes the temperature is 33C with using only conduction as heat transfer.

>>58421569

>conduction

You misspelled convection.

95W Polaris 10 with a 3 slot heatsink when?

>>58421624

>95 AMDWatts

How much SI Watts are that? 130?

>>58421648
Don't be retarded, they're embeded parts with a very strict power and thermal requirements.

File: image.jpg (208KB, 750x563px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 750x563px

>>58421648
>I did not expect us to be discussing the power draw, that's why we hid the power draw

>>58421517
Passive cooled is fine but objectively unlikely with this card. The first red flag is just how big the heatsink is on it. Where would I want passive cooling in the home? ITX? How is it going to fit? Second if I'm splurging on my uber ITX build for HTPC/Steam whatever why would I buy the 1050 Ti? There are Nvidia and AMD options that are liquid cooled OOTB and likely fit just as well or better. Third if it's a budget build ITX the last thing you're going to do is buy a 1050 Ti as that cuts into your CPU/mobo/ram/case budget. If anything you nab a 1050 or 460 near $100.

>>58421666

Well, they *should* be.

File: image.jpg (56KB, 576x694px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 576x694px

>>58421695
Why the fuck do you think quiet is somehow related to small?

>>58421695

Nah, it's probably for those few enthousiasts who want to build a silent budget PC.

>>58421701
Yeah, they *should*, and they better be unless AMD feels like dropping out of the embeded market due to lack of trust, since it's not like the one of the two markets they're actually making a profit off.

But clearly you know better.

File: r_600x450[1].png (128KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 600x450px

>>58421516

>>58421585
Technically it conducts the heat from the GPU to the heatsink and the heatsink does convection cooling.

>>58421749
Is Vulkan already widespread? I thought it's still a baby meme right now.

>max 40 watts

Oh wow it's fucking nothing.

>>58422510
Without convection currents, it's just some fluid conduction and phase change energies released
The heatpipes don't allow for a current and convection implies fluid heating in an open and unrestricted fluid environment
This is just a reflux condenser

File: image.jpg (116KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1920x1080px

>>58422537
TWO GAMES
W
O

G
A
M
E
S

>>58421624
XFX has 480 running ~80 watts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWASNajSdpg

>>58422623
Lol lies

Passive is nice and all, but I'd rather have a fan cooled system. Even if the fan is super low rpm and inaudible it makes a big difference in cooling.

>>58421181
You can unlock some core on 460.

>>58421401
>1050 is pretty shit

>>58422537
ID has been known for using cutting edge technology for like since the creation of their company

>>58422623
These numbers are unlikely. I know the XFX cards are more efficient, but that would be some absurd difference between reference.
I have rigs full of 470's doing opencl work which are undervolted and underclocked and they still pull more than ~80w each.

MUH DICK

I did this with a 750ti, glad to see it being done with a 1050ti too

>>58422623
Checked out the video.
He's only measuring the estimated wattage of the die itself, not the full card which can be fairly inaccurate.
Considering all mine are running at 1050Mhz @ .9v and they still pull 85-90w (total draw) I think the video is a bit misleading.

>>58423775
What do you mean unlikely?

Are you saying the video maker is falsifying data?

>>58422851
Well that's what they suggested in the review (to have a few case fans). In that case however, it somewhat defeats the purpose of diy-ing a passively cooled card if you're not gonna go all the way and have a pure passively cooled system. That being said I'm not a gamur so I wouldn't know how loud GPU fans are compared to case fans. I would ask the question though what would be better between a passively cooled card + case fans versus an actively cooled card (blower or open air) + no case fans.