Does anyone have experience with obtaining highly overclockable

Look for batch codes from confirmed OC on forums and buy a cpu from that pool.

>>58371116
But I don't have a pool

File: 1417755548397.gif (421KB, 700x525px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 700x525px

>somewhere out there, there is the one-on-a-billion flawlessly manufactured i7 7700K that can reach 5.6ghz
>it's probably in the hands of someone who doesn't even overclock it at all

we were supposed to be together...

>>58371145
Please dont post on my thread

Microcenters have a very lenient return policy

Though they probably catch the same person buying and returning 20 cpus

>>58370949
My assrock mobo died and took my 6600k with it. Intel sent me a much better chip. 4.7 at 1.28 vs 4.6 at 1.35. i could probably push it even further if I fucked with it more.

>>58370949
>4.20

When will this meme end.

>>58371145
tfw fx8350 can get 8 ghz

>>58371306
feel when my 6600k can't even do 4.5
feel when i'm 5'3

my processors are manlets too...

>>58371479
>he didn't delid himself to reach greater height

>>58371479
Send it back. $25 for a 48 hour turn around.

>>58371145
I don't think such a 7700k exists. The highest sane OC (ie. not liquid nitrogen, and not disabling some cores) so far is 5.2ghz

Kaby lake does not appear to have the potential of previous architectures, we probably won't see anything on the level of that 5.2ghz 6600k.