4k@144hz is now a reality. VideoCardz have apparently got

1080p is just fine.

>>58324422
this

>>58324422
>Living in 2008

>>58324422

60 fps too

>$2000 monitor
>$2000 worth of videocards (probably need two 1080Tis
will this monitor drive down the price of 1440p 144hz? that seems like the sweet spot between overall quality and run-ability

now make it with a polarizer film on top and 30"+ size

>>58324422
1080p in a tablet is considered the bare minimum. anything less and it's definitively a "budget" tablet. what makes you think our desktop monitors should be at that same level?

maybe you don't, but i look at my desktop monitors an order of magnitude longer (per day) than i do my tablet or phone screens.

>tfw too used to ultrawides and want higher res than 1440

>>58324511
>tfw too used to ultrawides
i'm sure people get used to not wearing fedoras after wearing them for a while. you'll cope.

>>58324422
>>58324428
>>58324429
>>58324430
>>58324504
720p at 24 fps is all you need, seriously, anything more is just snakeoil and retarded

>>58324563
lol

>>58324422
fpbp

>>58324422
Delete this.

>>58324398
muh dick

>>58324398
The Freesync HDR model will be great for Couter Strike Source.

>>58324422
Thats what I thought, until I got 1440p

>>58324422

>the current year

I seriously wonder where VideoCardz get all their press releases from. They just keep shitting on NDAs over and over again. I seriously doubt any company is willing to give those guys any inside information.

Give me 32", 4k, HDR, 120hz, freesync, and I will pay 600+ for it

>>58324398
No GPU can push that for games without low settings though

also who's going to buy a probably $2000 display?

>>58325058
Someone probably passes the info to them and WCCF tech clearly

>>58324910
AOC has a 1080p 240hz display coming for that

http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/aoc-agon-ag251fz/

File: wrong.gif (124KB, 115x115px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 115x115px

>>58325116

Were on the cusp of Vega and volta, these cards are for 4k.

It doesn't even need to run 100+ fps, just 50-60+ with freesync/gysnc looks great

>>58325104
Pathetic goyim
You can pay $1200 or you can fuck right off

>>58325145

Make it oled with a vesa mount and I'll pay 1400+

>>58324398
I have to have it. My titan x hits 144 in overwatch at 4k, wow too. This is going to be so amazing I havent been this excited in so long

>>58324422
1440p is the limit actually. 4k is a meme.

>>58324453
It wont be 2k. Probrably more like 5-800.

>>58324492
If anything it needs to be smaller. 24" is ideal for gaming monitors. Why would you want 30? The ppi would be shit.

>>58325206
Ya naw, 60hz G-sync displays are $800, and they just released a 1600p Ultra Wide G-sync that's $1300

https://pcpartpicker.com/product/TzfmP6/asus-monitor-pg27aq

By contrast there's a number of Free-sync 4k IPS diplays under $400

>>58325206
>5-800
Maybe in two years, no way it'll be that low at launch especially with G-SYNC jewery.

>>58325104
Why would you want 120hz? The 144hz has your quantum dot.

>>58324398
What is the best size for 4k? Isin't 27' too small?

>>58325206
Their 1440p version is $800

>4k
>gaming

This meme needs taking out back and shooting.

>>58325280
it depends on if you want to scale or not.

>>58325528
Even the low end vegas can do over 60hz dude.

>>58325988
Name 2 vega cards.

I have a 1440p 144hz and its nice, but I've never tried 4k and I want to try it with the new amd gpu

Gonna be a long wait though, probably wont see them till February

>>58324910
>Source

>>58326084
I also have a 1440p 144Hz and it's very nice.

I don't want to see 4k. I don't want to become accustomed to 4k like I did to 144Hz. Anything less looks like trash in comparison.

>>58326315
You didn't become accustomed to 1440p though
I know you didn't, search your heart, you know 1080p is fine now that you have 1440p

>>58326315
Nah mate. 1080p is trash too.

1440p 34 inch 100hz IPS ultrawide masterrace here. 4k isnt worth it on a monitor that small anyway, and having to always need the most current top end build to support that resolution is a hassle.

>>58324422
No it isn't. 1440p is so much better it's unreal. I didn't believe it until I used a 1440p monitor.

That being said I don't think I like 4k because it's highly dependent on scaling and some poorly scaled things are annoying on 1440p already.

File: e4d9efd1f4dd19f371619db2f085974f.png (469KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 900x1200px

>>58324398
>can be driven up to 3840x2160 at 144 Hz
Ya maybe with a propitiatory cable setup. DisplayPort doesn't have the bandwidth yet.
>IPS
And lost interest.

why won't g-sync just die

>>58326518
HDMI 2.1's spec becomes official this year but unfortunately it sounds like it won't be hitting devices until at least Q4 2017

>>58324613
suck my fucking dick you fucking retard

>>58326549
Because it's better then that Freesync trash

>>58326643
Better bet is waiting for DisplayPort update. HDMI is still lacking.
>>58326549
It's the best option.

1280x1024 75Hz here

Bite me

>>58324398
I'm still waiting for this but using OLED
I prefer watching movings on my phone because the contrast is just too perfect.

>>58327283
movies*

>>58326084
Supposedly the reveal is at CES 2017 in the next few days

>>58327283
>I prefer watching movings on my phone
kys

>>58326643
>HDMI
>The monopoly tard standard that is perpetually years behind displayport
Who gives a fuck about them other than muh drm mpaa idiots?
It's a disaster of failures.

>>58326518
>DisplayPort doesn't have the bandwidth yet.
1.4 does though
>IPS
Sure, but according to some sources this will be the first FALD computer display, which sounds like a really bad idea, even if it has 384 zones as announced.

>>58324398
Call me when they have a 33" at 144hz.