http://www.hdmi.org/manufacturer/hd mi_2_1/index.aspx >4

>>58321742
oh boy
>inb4 companies charge hundreds of dollars for what will effectively be a couple ethernet cables wound together

>>58321742
>DisplayPort has had this for ages.
Fuck this proprietary shit. It's disgusting that HDMI is more renowned than DP.

Televisions and input devices need to start supporting DisplayPort because I want adaptive sync on my TV when the Playstation 5 comes out.

HDMI can fuck off.

>>58321742
cables and panels aren't the problem. internet bandwith is.

an 8k movie would be like 200gb unless you compress it to shit.

>8k
that's dumb, the human eye can't even see that many pixels.

>>58321742
>they still cant crack HDMI 2.0 HDCP 2.2

>>58321742
I would love an 8k monitor for around $300-$500 in the future but don't really care about having 8k content. Then I'll finally get near the same pixel density available in a 5.5 inch 1080p phone.

>>58321872
Graphics cards come with more DPs than HDMI ports. For example AMD RX 480 has 3 DP and 1 HDMI out. Most new monitors have at least one DP.

File: seagate-60tb-ssd-640x490.jpg (57KB, 640x490px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 640x490px

>>58324231
So?
We got cheap 10TB HDDs and 60TB SSDs today.

>>58324366
Who gives a shit about HDCP 2.2. We need UltraHD blurays cracked as soon as possible.

>>58324231
a fully uncompressed file would be much more than 200gb

File: 00004what-a.gif (2MB, 292x331px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 292x331px

>tfw no 30" 8k

>>58321742
I just want 8k @ 36 bpp @ 120 Hz in 40-45", then I'm probably good for monitors until holograms or neutral jacks or whatever come out.