>it is now 2017 >MPC-HC was last updated: 14 November 2015

>>58318989
It works perfectly, what would you like more form a player?

>>58318989
Late 2016.

https://nightly.mpc-hc.org/

>>58318989
install mpv

>>58318989
will they ever port mpc-hc to Linux. mpv is okay but i miss the old UI.

>>58318989
It's literally feature complete and bug free, what is your problem?

Use MPV if you want buggy alpha software

>>58319025
It would be reasonably trivial to cobble together a mpc-hc style ui for MPV.
Is this something people are interested in?

>>58319010
This.
>>58319015
And this.

>>58319204
>t would be reasonably trivial to cobble together a mpc-hc style ui for MPV.

why has nobody done it yet?

>>58319025
>will they ever port mpc-hc to Linux
It uses DirectShow. What purpose would there possibly be for freetards?

>>58319015
this

>>58319367
Goes against fundamental design principles of mpv. Not much interest.
I'd look into it though if there's interest.

File: Cone-Video-large.png (182KB, 907x946px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 907x946px

>>58318989
It's been VLC for me ever since I started using Linux as my desktop.

>>58319454
>It's been VLC for me

sad

>>58319454
>VLC
>on anything
F A I L

i already transfer to MPC masterrace
because it's good

>>58319712
>mpv

>>58319204
>>58319367
There is one:
https://github.com/cmdrkotori/mpc-qt

I don't think it's stable/finished yet and there are no release builds. It seems like most libmpv clients are either feature limited (gnome-mpv) or incomplete (mochi-player, mpc-qt) at the moment.

File: 1475357353091.png (377KB, 448x649px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 448x649px

>>58319454

RIP MPC

>>58318989
Winamp

File: ace.jpg (61KB, 394x473px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 394x473px

>>58320770
lol'd more than i should've

>>58318989
>MPC-HC was last updated: 14 November 2015
And it will be updated soon when AV1 comes out

>>58320882
>better
>doesn't support linked mkvs like memepv

>>58321736
>And it will be updated soon when AV1 comes out

you wish

>>58321780
The fact that they are pushing nightlies proves that they are still developing it, as soon as something major like a new codec supported by literally everyone comes out they will release a stable

>>58321815
They are way behind with LAV Filters. Enjoy.

>>58318989
Something over a year ago. So what? It's not that much.

>>58319423
>Goes against fundamental design principles of mpv.
One just based on their egos:
>If madshi can write a back end and have a major project fall over themselves wanting to integrate it, the same should happen for mpv!
Still waiting for it, eh?

>>58319454
Best player. When you want to sit down and watch a fucking movie, not spend time tweaking a bunch of settings that nerds will orgasm over.

File: Capture.png (12KB, 447x331px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 447x331px

>>58320882
No subs, either.

>>58322079
I don't have to tweak anything with mpv or mpc-hc

>>58322122
what are you trying to play?

File: subs.png (1MB, 1090x867px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1090x867px

>>58322122
>
>>58322122

>>58321765
Can someone actually provide a sample of linked mkvs? Never seen one in my life. Ordered chapters - yes, but not the linked one.

>>58322079
Guaranteed.replies.s01e1.720p-g-technology.mkv

File: secrettechnique.webm (2MB, 1188x724px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1188x724px

>>58322079
Here's the secret technique they don't want you to know on how to configure mpv.

>>58322433
DELET

File: Untitled.png (536KB, 1280x799px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 1280x799px

>>58321831

>>58322781
>1280x800

I always knew mpc-hc users were poor.

mpv has always been better

>>58319030
>Use MPV if you want buggy alpha software
poor bait

>>58322079
You configure settings once and they stay there forever. Your post is as dumb as people who think Arch is difficult to use.

>>58323118
You wanted it 1920x1200 fullscreen?

>>58323123
this

>>58323137
>buttblasted memepv autist

>>58318989
Last time it was updated was like 10 days ago

File: Untitled-1.jpg (3MB, 3383x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3383x2160px

>>58323118
Hello

Is Mplayer/SMplayer any good nowadays (for GNU/Linux that is?)

>>58325417
Just watch films in terminal

>>58325417
no.

we use mpv

>>58325389
damn!! do you think my i5 2400 could run that?

>>58325700
I actually tried to play it on few CPUs, including 2400.
Without hardware acceleration, 2400 and some i5 from 4600 couldn't play it. 100% CPU usage and lost frames. My i7 4770 plays it with no issues and 60% CPU usage.

However, with graphic card that has HEVC Hi10p acceleration, I had no problem playing it on even haswell i3 CPU. With GTX950, i3's usage was around 5%.

The only cards that I know of that support it are GTX950, GTX960, and all of GTX1000 cards. No idea about radeons though.

>>58325826
would a 750 ti be able to do it?

>>58326297
No. But some GTX750 could.
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-gm206-maxwell-2-0-architecture/

Also, have a look here. Basically you need a GPU with at least feature set F.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_PureVideo

File: index.png (115KB, 787x2127px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 787x2127px

>>58318989
>(you)

>>58326464
>Updated MadVR to version 0.91.4
since when does MPC-HC come with MadVR?

Nice neet codec pack

>>58318989
>When can we expect the announcement that this video player has stopped development?

You know that they literally updated the nightly less than 2 weeks ago? Learn yourself something, retarded MPV shill.

what media player do professionals use? is there something objectively better than the ones offered for free?

>>58326862
mpvfags are used to dling their broken shit every hour

>>58326862
>>58327993
>muh up to date translations

File: Capture.jpg (199KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1920x1080px

>>58322433
that disgusting window shadow and window bar.

>>58328195
looks fine