ITT:stuff that's been more that relevant for longer

>>58306251

...CPUs? Intel?

>>58306251
I7 870, gtx 680 4GB, CDs.

>>58306251
>>58306509
i5 2nd gen

i agree with you, this is becoming the new core 2 duo in that there is really no point in upgrading if all you do is use a web browser and some light applications, like most people do

File: 1482422094383.jpg (79KB, 496x515px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 496x515px

>>58306542
>tfw 2500K owner

File: phenom_x6.jpg (45KB, 503x296px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 503x296px

My Phenom II X6 1055t is perfectly happy to this day.

I really like this CPU.

File: 6af9d6a0-5e46-417a-986b-3bbdfe31a97d..jpg (686KB, 2192x1603px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 2192x1603px

>>58306251

q6600

>>58306542
i used an e6750 until last year
c2d's are still fine desu

File: hdd-hard-disk-drive-storage.png (468KB, 2400x1800px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 2400x1800px

This cunt right here.

>>58306542
i5 is overkill for basic use.
I still use a Core 2 Duo E8600, which came out like 9 years ago. Only the very worst of horribly-designed webpages bog it down.

>>58306517
TRRS?,or do you just mean 3,5mm jacks in general?

>>58307035
What OS and browser?

Using my old e7400 on Solus with the iGPU, browser is midori, web browsing works flawlessly and I can watch HD YouTube videos without any stutters. If it's windows, maybe try something lighter like Ubuntu MATE or Solus to see if it'll perform better.

File: 1460350272603.jpg (146KB, 375x550px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 375x550px

>>58306966
delet this

>>58307115
yeah, linux would probably do better, but I'm sticking with Win7 and Firefox.
only 1080p youtube videos lag on me, and I can get around that by just saving them and using VLC instead.

>>58307162
Fair enough.

I never bothered with 1080p videos, Australian internet isn't the best and there isn't a significant enough quality difference to justify the increased size for silly YouTube videos.

Anything c2d and newer should honestly be plenty for a plain old facebook machine imo.

>>58306542
>>58306251
fun fact: the single core performance on any intel chip has LITERALLY not improved since sandy bridge

buy amd now if you know whats good for you

>>58307230
No improvement WHATSOEVER?

Bullshit.

>>58306966
Not if you have an array/RAID of them with SSD caching.
Dirt cheap storage that's wicked fast.

>>58306251
All of Apple's products

File: btfo.png (841KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 1280x720px

>>58307230
wow. You're an idiot.

>>58306251
grammar oibvously

File: thumbnail.png (7KB, 450x235px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 450x235px

Been around way too long.