>Donal Trump is killing net neutrality and we voted him h

>>58299965
because you are ameridumbs

>>58299965
I didn't vote for him.

>>58299965
>we

>>58299965
As long as he abolishes policies that make competition between ISPs impossible (which are a part of current "net neutrality" package), it's all going to be good.

>>58299965
>believing fake news

>>58299999
>>58300000

>>58299965
sauce?

>>58300011
Telcoms are natural monopolies. There will never be enough competition for Corruption 101 of holding content providers hostage to not be feasible. Remember, under Trump they won't have to admit they're throttling, so how are you as a consumer going to compare even if you did have choice?
Any ISP that advertised it didn't throttle like the others would probably be shut down for being "anti-business."

>>58300013
>implying

>>58300495
>under trump companies won't be held liable for provided services as stated in the signed agreement.

So he's going to eliminate false advertising, and every other law that prevents companies from doing such things?

>>58300495
>>58300011
yeah but what if you have some kind of business or you are a user of a web page that the ISP really hate? what if, for example, those ISP are being ruled by lefties and other democrats? What if they see 4chan as a threat or a usless web page? No more 4chan 4 u m8

>>58300539
>So he's going to eliminate false advertising
False advertising? That's librul speak! In conservatism it's called "success."

>>58299965
>we

because this site is crawling with 20 something edgelords who are too ironic and badass to have sensible political opinions. also they're american.

>>58300554
It is if you're an Intel shill at least.

>>58300011
>As long as he abolishes policies that make competition between ISPs impossible

How does that make comptetition impossible? There is no hardware or engineering reason why ISPs want to get rid of net neutrality. And places with net neutrality and where they don't even discuss getting rid of it has much better competition than America.

>>58300013
>anything that isnt breitbart is fake news

>>58299965
Net Neutrality was never needed, what was needed is making it easier for smaller ISPs to form and destroy laws that enable monopolies, thanks obama.

So /g/, which 2016 candidate (from all of them, not from just shillary/trump) was the best/least bad computing/internet/online privacy wise?

>>58302026
None of them because they're all oldfarts with no clue.

>>58302013
Net Neutrality means that the ISP is not allowed to police what it carries. Without it, be ready to pay more for sites which are not sponsored by your ISP.

>trusting the same govt who does massive surveillance on you to regulate internet providers

>>58302039
They won't pull that shit if they know someone can easily jump to an ISP that won't do the same thing. Monopolies enable this behavior.

>>58300013
>6 million illegals voted

>>58299991
You don't vote for a king.

>>58302044
>Trusting ISP who historically had monopolies will just magically regulate itself.

>>58302121
The reason the ISPs have monopoly is because they lobbied the government for regulations to make it that way.
Besides, do you really want net neutrality regulation that badly that you're willing to let the ISPs fucking write it?
When the foxes are designing the chicken coop, don't ask for more redesigns.

>>58302121

much better than having them make solicitations and loopholes with the Fed under the name of "net neutrality" in order to protect their oligopoly even further desu

>>58302149
Good thing trump wants to make it illegal for a company to do any lobbying.

File: twilight zone donald trump.png (233KB, 596x406px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 596x406px

>>58299965
We love him because his zany antics create dynamic and interesting new web content constantly. We need more great men like him.

Or else boredom will catch up with us, after all cat videos could only consume half of our lives at best. And even the greatest TV writers couldn't make up stuff as good as this.

Also all the new content and spin off memes will create exponential demand for hardware and software development as we try to store and stream all of it. This also creates new job, just like how Trump promised.

>>58302026
Gary Johnson. He had some dumb ideas, but the all around platform was superior to the platform of the other candidates.

>>58302053
No one said monopolies will be gone. Quite the contrary. I expect Trump Inc. to start buying more telcos very soon.

1. Become president
2. Buy all telcos and strengthen their monopolies.
3. Kill Net Neutrality
4. ...
5. Profit.

>>58302026
McAfee
But he didn't take the election seriously and conceded to Gary "What's a Leppo?" Johnson

>>58302164
LMAO
That will never happen, you know that right? The very people he's putting in people are those that heavily utilize lobbying, and have been doing such for decades.

Trumpet delusional levels are reaching an all time high.

>>58302191
he's not in office yet and you're acting like he hasn't done what he promised
oh well all the more pain to you when he's elected for another term

I voted Hilldawg.

>>58302213
Except he promised just about everything, and was very self contradicting about several key issues.

>>58302242
Wrong. His key issues stayed the same if you look on his website.

because le maymay 2016

>>58302213
>promises the world
>IT'LL HAPPEN TRUST ME I BELIEVE IN THE DONALD
as i said
delusional
he won't be elected for a second term, don't worry friendo :)

>>58299965
>we
only people who voted for him are contrarian retards

>>58302264
His rhetoric and several backtracking statements speak otherwise.

Go back to The_Donald if you're just here to shill generally and not about net neutrality.

File: big laffs.png (21KB, 706x669px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 706x669px

>>58302213
>Trump will make lobbying illegal, remove lobbyists from having too much white house influence!
>I know, let's just appoint the CEO who the lobbyist works for instead

>>58302287
top kek that's what they said about his first term

>>58302305
oh wow using big words like rhetoric now huh? big boy let me tell you something, net neutrality protects monopolies
grow up maybe?

>>58302308
CEOs have much more experience than politicians who never held a real job in their lives

>>58302177
I voted Johnson too, but he's a democrat posing as a libertarian. I would have voted for McAfee if i could. Too bad the libertarian party is terrible in it's current form.

>>58302305
>Anyone who likes trump is an /r/the_donald reddit faggot
Why is it okay for liberals to project this hard?

>>58302349
I left my teenage libertarian phase when I turned 18, why haven't you?

>>58302350
because /pol/ is a reddit colony at this point

now fuck off

>>58302350
Well, seeing how /pol/ has been invaded by the_donald posters, his statement isnt false.

>>58302326
And letting ISPs run wild won't restrict your access to information and quash any new, small ISPs that they need for competition and technology advancement?

File: free.png (29KB, 401x238px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 401x238px

>>58300539
>false advertising

>>58302149
>The reason the ISPs have monopoly is because they lobbied the government for regulations to make it that way.

Yes, which is why there is a focus on Net Netruality, and only Net Neutrality. It's one of the laws that they don't profit from. ATT, Comcast will prevent new competition from appearing by colluding with Congress.

.
>>58302155
>Undoing one regulation, is going to magically remove all of the other regulation that benefit ISP by keeping the compettion.
>He thinks ISP won't just rig the market to block competition.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/09/att-sues-nashville-in-bid-to-stall-google-fiber/?comments=1

File: you picked the wrong place to be degenerate kid, nothing personnel.jpg (126KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 900x675px

>>58302356
please tell us about your journey away from libertarianism and towards the dark enlightenment

>>58302287
>he won't be elected for a second term, don't worry friendo :)
I'd like to believe that but it's probably not going to be a clean sweep if he even loses at all.

This is what I think will happen. He'll probably coast on the remnants of Obama's policies and take credit for them while removing the parts that are less popular. After like 6 years of removing unpopular policies the economy will start to teeter and it will collapse by the 8th year. This clears the way for the democrats to win by a fuckhuge margin and people compare Trump to Dubya. So then we get Clinton/Obama 2.

Republicans ruin everything and democrats pick up the pieces. People keep electing republicans expecting a different result and people keep electing democrats hoping for the same result.

>>58302167
Trump is literally saving the economy and he's not even president yet.

>>58300554

In China its called success.

In the u.s. its called false advertising.

>>58300710
USA is the only place with net neutrality.

>>58300539
>false advertising,
Right wing cuck speak for fraud.

File: 1444266169736.gif (3MB, 360x203px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 360x203px

>we

>>58299965
isn't net neutrality a bad thing that is in actuallity just the opposite of its' name??

>>58300011
Found the lolbertarian retard.

>>58302506
No.

>>58302526
since when? and why does the fight the future foundation say that's what it is?

>>58301997
Well to be fair, anything that wasn't Breitbart was completely wrong about Trump.

>>58302534
ok just looked it up and it's just so much smoke and mirrors. everything it claims to be against is still common practice. the only thing that will achieve what net neutrality aims for is content providers like netflix, hulu, etc... suing big telecoms over unfair business practices

>>58302534
>since when?
Always? America's internet has pretty much always had net neutrality. When we switched from phone lines to cable and fiber the rules that were in place on phone lines didn't get carried over to cable and fiber, broadband companies were in a blindspot in the existing regulations. The FCC finally addressed the blindspot by adding cable and fiber to title II but now Trump wants to get rid of the FCC which will probably fuck up everything.

>>58302423
You really don't understand how legislation is written, do you?
First you get a central idea; in this case it's net neutrality.
Then, during discussion and debate, it gets passed around and every person paid off by the telecoms industry adds their own little clause to it along the lines of "unless you're running an ISP" or some other bullshit. Then they pass this law, and the loophole become law. So now current ISPs don't have to give a shit about net neutrality but possible new competitors (like google fiber) do.
The monopoly is reinforced since you're asking telecom paid politicians to go against their employers. Which is not the american public.

File: trumptweeter.jpg (51KB, 577x314px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 577x314px

>>58302460
His twitter account alone is soild gold and it stablizign the markets as he posts.

>>58300011
America is to big for competition to realistically ever appear in this market.

You have to lay tons of wires, lines, etc

>>58300013
>Still trying to rationalize voting for someone who only wants to make himself richer

The denial is strong

both of the main presidential candidates were shit, sorry to say desu

>>58303103
One was a giant turd the other was a hurricane of diarrhea. We got the hurricane

>>58299965
Good. It should've died a long time ago. This isn't commie europpa where everything needs to be regulated by the government.

>>58301997
>Believing news outlets after they lied about Osama having weapons of mass destruction causing thousands of deaths

You'd have to be pretty braindead desu

>Prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that: (1) marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or (2) sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.

First amendment protection act, this is why we voted for Trump. Faggots and globalists are harmful to America.

>>58302460
By cutting taxes effectively cutting corporation tax to 0%? Ha, sure.

>>58302871
All he does on his twitter is claim responsability for things he didnt do and promise to do things he never will.

>>58303685
1st amendment protection doesn't need protection it automatically supersedes all other laws that are not amendments to the constitution. Looks more like pandering and restating what has already been stated. It might actually infringe on the 1st if it allows the government to discriminate against homo couples.

File: ha.png (2KB, 475x22px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 475x22px

>>58303905
>not filtering the cancer that is killing this website

>>58299965
>elect a fag into office whose entire campaign consists of MUH GUD OLD TIEMS
>act surprised he's a statist luddite control freak

Good job, MAGA fags.

>>58303905
Its to prevent homosexuals from taking legal action against someone for believing that they are immoral for fucking men.

If you live in a SJW infested area like San Francisco and tell a faggot you won't provide flowers for his wedding, he can sue you for discrimination. This law will protect you.

>>58299965
>We voted for him
>We love him
>We

Nah. I'm not even mad he won compared to Hillary but loving him is an entirely different story.

>>58303954
why is /g/ so full of cucks?

>>58300013
>implying Trump won and the media isn't just hiding that it was someone else.

>>58303982
If you live in a state that doesn't care about homos then you're already allowed to do that. Don't set up a Christfag cakeshop in California where they care about homos.

>states rights until the states make laws we don't like

>he fell for Trump meme

kek, I'm lmaoing@ur life from my sofa in syria

>>58302326
Can you explain how net neutrality bolsters monopolies? And if so why would they be pushing to end it?

File: conan turns on his new monitor.gif (2MB, 623x340px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 623x340px

>>58299965
Net neutrality isn't a thing outside of US and everything is fine. Because of this my mobile provider gives free data for facebook and stuff.

The problem is provider monopolies.

>>58302623


If you didn't have had your head in your ass, you would realize that Google lobbys for net netruality and ISP lobbys against it. Whatever, don't shitpost on 4chan when your torrent for your anime throttles.

File: 1483088374752.png (780KB, 1001x1001px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 1001x1001px

>>58304459
You fucking scared the shit out of me. My monitor is known for shipping with like 3 dead pixels for unlucky people. I thought i had a late bloomer.

>>58303982
That's not a first ammendment right, though. I agree that businesses should be allowed to discriminate if they are private, but doing so isn't a first ammendment right at all.

>>58303982
You deserve to be sued for descriminating against pure lesbians.

File: meyer.jpg (161KB, 386x480px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 386x480px

>>58299965
Watch Hypernormalization by Adam Curtis. In fact watch all the Adam Curtis documentaries.

>>58304865
I can think of two situations where this particular problem has surfaced recently and in both cases the person or entity discriminating were clearly in the wrong.

First one was a private entity, a cake shop that didn't want to serve a gay couple because the owner claimed to be religious which would have been okay but they did not register their shop as a religious organization so they were not allowed to discriminate against the couple in that area.

Second time was a county clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses and refused to resign so that someone else could. Since they prevented everyone from getting licenses it was technically not discrimination but a judge ordered them to start issuing licenses and they still refused, so they were arrested for contempt of court.

>>58304974
Good, fag men are a diseases. I'm just glad they didn't turn a lesbian couple away.

Net neutrality is the EU law

>>58304974
You only think that because you are a bigot that believes being a gay couple is ok. You need to respect my right to not want to be around degenerates.

Who fucking cares.

>>58305040
Lesbians are perfectly acceptable and are non degenerate.

>>58305063
real life lesbians are nothing like the ones in porn, anon

lmao at his little flaming asian dick

File: rare stef.jpg (14KB, 804x446px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 804x446px

>>58305040
>tripfag
>retard with no arguments
Literally every time

File: mpv-shot0090.jpg (184KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1920x1080px

>>58299965

more interested in that picture than in your post, desu

>>58305077
Lie, it is purest love. The fact only fag men are hated and not lesbians proves it.

>>58305095
Doesn't matter if the President of the country and the Justices agree with me.

Its going to be legal to kick fags out because Trump is fighting to make America great again.

Gonna drain the motherfucking swamp, fire up the coal plants, and get oil cheaper than solar again.

File: 1466721012149.jpg (33KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 480x270px

>another net neutrality thread
>another babbling group of idiots who think net neutrality is about giving them unlimited highspeed internet
>another retarded group of fuckwits who think that the current shit state of american ISPs is because of "unchecked monopolies" (lol)
>another boot-licking group of dickshits who honestly believe the best way to beat bad legislature is to legislate more legislation to out-legislate the already legislated legislature

>>58305122
>Gonna drain the swamp, proceeds to put establishment politicians in cabinet
>DUDE COAL
>Implying the US will start more domestic oil production

>>58305164
Found the fag, get out. You ruin everything.

>>58305122
>implying Trump gives a shit about gays
>implying he cares about anything his puppet masters don't tell him to care about

>>58305175
Nice argument cuck.

>>58305190
You're the cuck because you're against trump. Trump will make america great again, will take out fag men out of america.

>>58305209
kek Im sure he will.

>>58305040
You can do that by moving away from them. Nobody is stopping you from doing that.

>>58305231
Trump knows male homosexuality is a disease. He will end the fag menace.

>>58305261
Trump could give absolutely two shits about gays, dipshit. He's already said he's not going to mess with gay marriage. Try again.

>>58305282
He's just pandering to fags. He knows only lesbians are acceptable homosexuality.

>>58305249
I'd rather move them away from me.
I.E. refuse to serve them and ask them to leave.

File: wew.png (25KB, 301x115px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 301x115px

>>58305297
Basically this.

His first major legislative action prevents faggots from suing for being discriminated against lmao.

>>58305298
You better not refuse lesbians.

Sometimes I wish /pol/ would die just so the fucking memester faggots that frequent it would leave this site for good.

Take this shit off /g/, idiots.

And where are the fucking mods?

>>58305347
Or at the very least people should stop taking bait from /pol/ retards

>>58305347
>>58305363
Fuck off fag lovers

>>58305387
:^)

>>58305331
Lesbians usually aren't obnoxious faggots so they don't get ostracized as often. They also don't spread aids at a breakneck pace like faggots do.

>>58305347
Mods don't care about these /pol/-bait threads. Report em multiple times & they do nothing.

File: makebelievesign.jpg (58KB, 525x463px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 525x463px

>>58305347
You are living in a fucking SJW hugbox, try taking 10 steps out of your comfort zone and you will realize the rest of the nation still hates fags.

>>58305408
>announcing reports
enjoy your ban, SJW

>>58305407
Only a fag would ostricze lesbians.

>>58305440
>implying

>>58305465
Fuck off SJW fag enabler.

>>58305493
Why so triggered?

>>58305493
>>58305504
>this samefagging
leftists are so pathetic

>>58305504
You're the triggered one

>>58305387
>>58305428

>ironic racism
>ironic gay-hating
>ironic atheism
>ironic misogyny
>ironic conservatism
>ironic political viewpoints
>ironic life

The worst part about /pol/ is that it is filled with retards like this who have no real convictions or political motivation, but have enough capacity to make threads and shit-post about "muh blacks" and "muh gays" and "muh women" and "muh muslims".

The irony, of course, is that I am an actual social conservative who has plenty of scathing critiques of mainstream black culture, third wave feminism, cultural acceptance of islam, and the normalization of homosexuality. But you retards wouldn't give two shits about that because your motivations can be summarized in the question of "will this statement piss people off for lulz xD".

You talk about a hugbox, but in reality YOU are the faggots in a hugbox. I debate, I argue, I critique and criticize. All in the real world, to real people, where they can defend themselves and attack me back. What fucking point is there in shitposting about your "ironic beliefs" that you wouldn't even BEGIN to defend if attacked for them in actual society?

You faux-nazis WISH you had the strength and conviction to mete out social conservatism on a liberal society gone wrong, but the reality is that, should there ever be a real fascist uprising in this country, you dumb-asses will be second to the block, right after the people you claim to hate.

>>58305407
are you kidding? i think you mean goth chicks because lesbians are literally faggot cia. Their whole existence is wrapped in brainstorming the deviation against a stable environment for finding the new means to carry this variation in the female further. They are the. ones that make all these equality claims to start with. Gay dudes literally will fuck under brigees and in shit up rest room stalls. Lesbians want to do it via subsidy by cucking men, getting pregnant and taking on child support, while the world. of man continues to roll out the red carpet for them because they help fibd a method to the madness that is female self-regulation. Notice that women and the lgbt deal will always blame someone else and never bring up the fact that they made a compronmse from their "vivid and natural mean".

File: Untitled.png (39KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 800x600px

>>58305516
You sure about that?

>>58305541
Fuck off faggot.

File: 1481107441704.jpg (88KB, 960x744px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 960x744px

>>58305537
>The worst part about /pol/ is that it is filled with retards like this who have no real convictions or political motivation, but have enough capacity to make threads and shit-post about "muh blacks" and "muh gays" and "muh women" and "muh muslims".
>
>The irony, of course, is that I am an actual social conservative who has plenty of scathing critiques of mainstream black culture, third wave feminism, cultural acceptance of islam, and the normalization of homosexuality. But you retards wouldn't give two shits about that because your motivations can be summarized in the question of "will this statement piss people off for lulz xD".
>
>You talk about a hugbox, but in reality YOU are the faggots in a hugbox. I debate, I argue, I critique and criticize. All in the real world, to real people, where they can defend themselves and attack me back. What fucking point is there in shitposting about your "ironic beliefs" that you wouldn't even BEGIN to defend if attacked for them in actual society?
>
>You faux-nazis WISH you had the strength and conviction to mete out social conservatism on a liberal society gone wrong, but the reality is that, should there ever be a real fascist uprising in this country, you dumb-asses will be second to the block, right after the people you claim to hate.
t. male feminist, black supremacist, and cuck shed architect

>>58305573
Suck my dick, Agatha.

>>58305610
And of course the /pol/tard doesn't come up with an argument.

>>58305541
Women are already crazy, being a lesbian hardly effects them at all.

Literally the worst I have seen a dyke do is put her tongue between her fingers and wink at someone.

They don't talk with a lisp and call guys girlfriend.

>>58305298
>I'd rather them move away from me
Then you are subjecting yourself to interaction with a community you don't wish to engage with and have nobody to blame but yourself.
If you own a business which recieves any public funding, you have to serve all citizens.
If you are a private entity which is free of federal funding, I'd agree that you should have the right to discriminate with disregard to federal law, but if you receive any state funding, endorsements, etc. you have to adhere to state ruling on such issues.
Ultimately, if you are a business receiving money from the state, renting space on a plot of land owned by the state or a subsidiary of the state, making use of handouts by the state to advance your business (such as roads, communication lines, delivery/postal), you have to do what they tell you to do.
You can do whatever you want when you go full privatized though.

>>58305537
Day of the rope will come for the straightshits and fag men, leaving a utopia of lesbians only.

>>58305633
>adhere to state ruling on such issues
And soon the state will rule that its ok.
/thread

>>58305610
>ignoring the part about me saying i'm a social conservative
>ignoring the part about me criticizing all of this liberal shit
>resorting to memes
>more memes
>memeing
>always memeing
>never ending memeing

That's it, I'm done. Congratulations, you have successfully trolled me.

>>58305647
We'll see, I guess. I have my doubts.

>>58305657
Watch out, he'll call you a "cuckservative".

>>58305687
Hes probably so sheltered that he doesn't believe that the entirety of all SJW movements turn into authoritarian hate mongering corrupt bullshit.

You can't say oh hes just a fag that behavior is fine, you start down that slide and soon everyone is walking around on welfare with their dicks hanging out high on crack. (outside of the projects I mean)

>>58305733
That wouldn't happen with lesbians

>>58305631
dykes have tried to get me arrested ( as prison raped in the ass ) because their younger sister had a crush on me, my ex girlfriend got preggo one day after i dumped her, the day after that she started slowly cluing me in on the fact that she is bisexual or a lesbian. She then tried to get me to sign papers that would give her full parentship. Every time we speak, some new layer in the "pending upheaval" of the system by lesbian is revealed to me. And boy is she smug.

Lesbians are not cool, man. Maybe high school aged, thin and tomboy lesbians are cool but the grandma lesbian, the PE coach lesbian and the politico lesbian are some of the most putrid and easy to hate people in the world.

>>58305630
you don't have an argument, leftist
>>58305657
>>58305687
more SJW samefagging

File: Untitled.png (43KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 800x600px

>>58305800
Hm?

>>58305829
>>58305560
>that poor ms paint editing
>that leftypol samefaggng

>>58305856
>Is proven wrong by screenshots
>NAH YOU EDITED IT

>>58305872
>the leftypol shill is still trying

>>58305898
>losing argument so resorts to name calling

>>58305872
He aint gotta like it if the hood don't love it. Das it mayne.

>>58299965
hope everyone is ready for the comcast/att versions of youtube/spotify/netflix to pop up and win by being unthrottled in the new tiered internet
>but muh competition
they'll all do it.

>>58305926
>the leftypol shill starts complaining about name caling when ""he"" has been complaining about "muh nazis" the entire thread
hilarious

>>58306024
Who has been complaining about nazis the entire thread though? Why are pulling made up accusations out of your ass?

>>58306085
>Why are pulling made up accusations out of your ass?
>says the guy who believes "real news"

>>58306085
Thats the obama sect for you. Just dont ask her for her race and you should be ok. She has no argument.

>>58306125
>Losing argument so proceeds to bring up news shit thats not even related to the argument

Done yet?

>>58306151
>the SJW actually believes that it had an argument
back to your BLM rally, SJW

>>58306178
>still resorts to name calling

>>58306202
It's not name calling when its true

File: 1476360649344.jpg (115KB, 595x450px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 595x450px

>thinking trump was going to fight for your interests
>thinking he had anything in mind but self-aggrandizement
>thinking he won't sell you out the second it's advantageous
dumbasses

File: bernie supporters.jpg (508KB, 1024x1672px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1024x1672px

>>58306258
wow I'm now #feelingthebern!

>>58306340
kek i didnt even vote dude. Just think it's funny how all trump has to do is throw a bone to yall angry right wing boys and youll believe he's not going to drop your muslim ban/drop your wall when he needs to, like that wasnt the plan all along. You got scammed, politicians do that. This is your first election isnt it

>>58299965
>we

>>58305261
>He will end the fag menace
sure he will

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8

>Mods delete the OP pic but not the thread

but why

>>58306340
Nice Meme! It was very XD and redpill!!!!xd!!!

File: 1476236045221.jpg (27KB, 500x492px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x492px

>2017
>being American
You like getting cucked that much?

>>58305631
And one guy acting like he's suckling dick you get all offended, kys you sensitive faggot

>>58305313
I think trump should kick insufferable fags like you out. Only a fool blindly follows someone without considering all sides.

>>58305610
Damn dude, do you guys even try anymore? Or do you just spin the buzzword wheel and use whatever you land on?

>>58306220
Yes, it is by definition, you don't read much do you?

>>58307849
literally EVERYONE who votes democrat fits into one of those three categories

>>58308127
What about voting independant? A bi partisan got is fucked and promotes corruption anyways

>>58302053

ITS LIKE YOU DON'T EVEN LIVE IN AMERICA

NONE OF THIS SHIT MATTERS

MOST AREAS ARE SANDWHICHED BETWEEN MAYBE TWO FUCKING ISPS IF THEY'RE LUCKY


REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE