Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: Screenshot from 2017-01-02 13-32-46.png (342KB, 1198x781px) Image search:
[Google]
342KB, 1198x781px
"he could appoint commissioners who will keep the net neutrality rules on the books, but not enforce them. Then if MSNBC were to offend him he could launch an investigation into its parent company, Comcast, over net neutrality. If the administration approved the AT&T/Time-Warner deal, it would have a similar bludgeon to use against CNN"
Fuck it just dismantle the FCC. Using net neutrality to silence the media is 10x more terrifying than slow lanes.
https://www.wired.com/2017/01/year-donald-trump-kills-net-neutrality/
>>
>>58288855
>Using net neutrality to silence the media is 10x more terrifying than slow lanes.
What makes you think the government wouldn't pressure the media after Net Neutrality is done with?
>>
>silencing the media with net neutrality
There's no media to silence. It's all bought.
>>
/pol/tards will argue that the loss of net neutrality is a good thing
>>
>>58288855
>Trump could accidentally fix the internet by trying to attack a publication
Also >lolbertarians would have been correct again
>>
>>58288855
>Fuck it just dismantle the FCC
Yeah, no thanks you libertarian fuck.
>>
>>58289014
anything the god emperor wants is good for us, obviously.
Back when he was a poor midwesterner he went through the same troubles and hardships we do, he knows how to help us better than we do.
>>
>>58289060
heh
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1