Help me /g/, what am I doing wrong here? (C) This is literally

>>58285346

double a[2];
double b[2];

a[n] allocates an array of size n so the max index is n - 1

what you're seeing here is an issue undefined behavior

>>58285380

Yes, I am LITERALLY using (n-1), so 1 as max index. I never use a[2] or b[2] on the picture.

>>58285346
what do you think should happen? seems fine to me

>>58285401
n-1 is 0 fucktard, not 1

>>58285415

lol it works now thx

>>58285401
if you have an array of size n (double a[n]) you can index it from 0 to n-1 (including 0 and n-1)

if you turned on compiler warnings you would've seen an out of bounds warning

>>58285460
>if you turned on compiler warnings you would've seen an out of bounds warning
lel

>>58285346
That's a big program 4.000000 you

>>58285598

I don't get it

>>58285598
kek

>>58285346
why such pajeet bro
just int a[1] lmao

>>58285460
>if you turned on compiler warnings you would've seen an out of bounds warning

$ gcc -Wall -Wextra test.c -o test
$ 

change all of the %f
to
%1.0f

post result

>>58288004
what gcc version?
try with -Wextra too

>>58285346
>programming C on Windows
truly blasphemous

>>58285694
you must be new here

>>58285694
fucking newfags i swear

>>58288895
They used -Wextra already

>>58289023
What language do you think most Windows software is written in?

File: this-thread.jpg (74KB, 396x382px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 396x382px

>>58285346
>>58285380
>>58285401
Is this a meme? We've had similar threads 4 days in a row now.

>>58289215
>>58289528

>a-am i fitting in yet?