>have 780Ti >driver crashes >have R9 Fury CF >Crimson

>>58268672
because i:
- want to play actual games
- want to use GPU acceleration in media software
- want to record video without frame drops

Intel doesn't do any of the three, that must be why it doesn't crash. Because it doesn't do anything

>>58268672
>Fury CF
Why...

>>58268712
There was a good deal. Sold one fury to my friend and kept the other one alone.
>>58268698
>Play actual games
New Intel Iris solutions are R7 260 level of performance (GT4). While it's not the best, it's not as bad as it was recently, and it should get better on the next iterations.
>want to use GPU acceleration
Newer releases of HD Graphics decode a lot of shit. KabyLake for example will decode VP9.
>record video
Can't speak about that, I don't do that at all.

File: 15841181_10154451296606137_1193055010_n.png (1MB, 960x949px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x949px

>>58268672

File: 1456650219571.png (150KB, 359x414px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 359x414px

>>58268672
Intel's graphics and drivers are so far behind they are giving up and putting AMD graphics on package with a MCM next gen. Not even Intel themselves believe your BS.

And it was your own dumbass fault for going multi GPU. Multi GPU sucks for Nvidia and AMD. Anyone who did even a minute of research would know this. Both cards work fine in single GPU configurations.

Why did you even make this shitty thread?

I'd love to ditch my system for something like a NUC, but I don't have good experiences with Intel Graphics performance wise. I got on average 10FPS at 1080p on DOTA2. I also want to run dual monitors and I doubt it's even capable of that.