I've always been interested in artificial females, as in

how long until i can get a robot gf

>>58262057
I'll bite.

>I've created a map of how the human psyche
Can you share it with us OP ?

I agree.

>>58262133

It's in Finnish, my native language. And I don't want to share it as I might make money with it one day.

File: 1481736758898.png (354KB, 1040x1704px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 1040x1704px

We need a real life XJ-9

Actually I think you should take it one step further and not bother with human-like AI at all until you've mastered "simpler" mammals/organisms like dogs and cats. Once you realize that this is not as trivial as someone who has never thought about it before would believe, you will be on the right path towards achieving your dreams.

>>58262057
Do you think it will happen in our lifetime?
I mean let's say we survive 40 years and get to the age of 60, do you think we will finally lose our virginity then, to robots?

>>58262057
Concept learning is an essential part of the human psyche. Is it not in your map? Read MLaPP, Norvig&Russel and restate your problem.
Pro tip: if you want to emulatie human intelligence at the very low level (1 artificial neuron for each human neuron), it's probably not gonna happen in your lifetime

>>58262219
But, can't you at least explain us the basis of it ?

>>58262057
>tfw people actually want a scarlet johansson bot
>a replica of an ugly, overrated and talentless actress

fucking why

>>58262057
Have you ever thought of seeking treatment for your autism?

>>58262057
You don't get the concept of the uncanny valley. It's a phase and the "realistic but not enough to be pleasant" problem will be solved with time. Otherwise, it would have been called the "uncanny slope".

>>58262491

>will be solved with time

Perhaps, but this just means we shouldn't even try to recreate Scarlett Johansson before our technology has improved.
Look at every "android" there is in the world right now. They're all horrible. That's our limit in 2016.

File: 095f37907d6a54cb59310928761bcccd.jpg (378KB, 728x1030px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 728x1030px

>2017
>tfw no gynoid gf

>>58262057
Meaning for us is based on experience. A chair is an object for sitting down on. But the experience of different chairs, knowing when someone needs to sit down because of their physical condition or because we're going to tell them shocking news, because they might faint - that is learned through experience.

Create a base and allow it to learn, thus creating its own neural network. All living things are programmed by repetition and environment. We as humans are socialised.

Attempts to create something closed and finalised won't work. If you let it assimilate information on existing networks (like the Internet) your job will be much easier.

>>58262531
You have to have a series of failures to learn from though. Even after technology improves, someone still needs to figure out how to put it all together and make it cohesive. They aren't gonna get that right the first time no matter what.

I don't care what they look like as long as I can fuck them.

>>58262057
Except there are paintings like look like photographs, so that argument doesn't really work.

>>58262057
The third one is actually the creepiest one from my perspective
You could make your robot learn from the owner, that is an easier way.

>>58262531
You're right, we should just stick with Susan Boyle.

>>58262219
Sittenhän laitat sen meille suomalaisille tietenkin nähtäväksi

Ja hyvää uutta vuotta

>>58262779
go home mongol man

>>58262057
I don't think we should concern ourselves with making perfect human replicas before we have an AI that's actually worth putting into a robot body. Right now humanoid robots are just useless prototypes, when you can hire a mexican for $7/hr, who will be infinitely more intelligent.

Also you seem to be running up on some of the basic problems of AI. Your AI has to be able to learn things, to make connections. Whenever you get a captcha that asks you to click all of the soup, you're helping Google's AI learn what is (and is not) soup.

After a while, you give it a picture, and ask it if it's soup. It will basically look to see how much it as in common with other confirmed pictures of soup, and give you an answer.

Computers don't "understand" things like you or I, that's on a totally different level of AI that we have no idea how to break into.

>>58262812
>Whenever you get a captcha that asks you to click all of the soup, you're helping Google's AI learn what is (and is not) soup.
Actually, you are not. It already knows what soup is and if you pick the wrong image, it till not accept it.

>>58262811
I am posting from my computer at home, faggot. It was meant for OP anyway, you don't need to understand it

File: 9f355ac9781fcc4a901b7f0540b288f0.jpg (67KB, 550x800px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 550x800px

Fireball Charming, please

>>58262862
I'm just speculating, but I think what Google's AI actually does is it gives you some pictures which it thinks are pictures of soup, and then it gives you another picture that it's not sure about. This is because if it asks you to click all of the pictures of X, you can usually pass the captcha if you click all of the pictures of X except for one.

File: 059a448e36a44afe6995903367dd1d5075b3a2a0.png (4MB, 1624x4109px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1624x4109px

My Life as a Teenage Robot, please

>>58262219
>>58262779
muakin kiinnostas nähdä
hyvät uudet vuodet

>>58262219
Elefantien ja pienten jaanisten tervedeksi

File: 1478403207655.jpg (103KB, 601x665px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 601x665px

>le idea guy shitposting actually getting replies

Looks like /g/ will become even more inane on the upcoming year

File: 1471218019820.jpg (230KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1280x960px

>>58263098

>>58262057
>realdoll

stop using that word, plz.

is not a generic name for sexdolls, but the most pleb, shitty, unispired, sexdoll brand i can tink of.