>Ryzen overclocks to 5Ghz on air JEWTEL ON SUICIDE WATCH

File: Fjwswbz.jpg (86KB, 608x369px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 608x369px

>ONE (punch) CORE
>UNSTABLE

AMD IPC 8 CORES = INTEL IPC 4 CORES

THEN

5Ghz in 1 AMD Core = 2.5Ghz in 1 INTEL CORE

checkmate poolists

File: b45ee6bdfb048b087ef640aa4cdacd882c282610300fa7011f21efc4d595ac1e_1.jpg (49KB, 479x660px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 479x660px

>>58259652
lul i trol u

>>58259278
Pretty sure they had 5ghz chips on the FX9000 series too.

>>58259278
Only 1 Core was enabled.

Instead of waiting to be disappointed when ryzen gets finally released just grab any intel K cpu they all can do 5ghz on air EASY and enjoy IPC GOODNESS.

>>58259278
Kaby Lake also overclocks very well when cores disabled.

It is useless but for something like i3 Kaby Lake overclocking is actually interesting

File: Intel-juice.jpg (411KB, 724x483px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 724x483px

>>58259808
Forgot pic.

Zen won't hit 5ghz overclocks on an 8 core part, most likely it will max out around 4ghz.

>>58259808
>any intel K cpu they all can do 5ghz on air EASY and enjoy IPC GOODNESS.

just like bullshit like every i5 2500k oc to 4.5ghz? no thanks i will never fell for OC meme again from both Intel and Amd. Since both companies and people keep shilling how great they oc but in reality it's total doshit

>>58260873
>just like bullshit like every i5 2500k oc to 4.5ghz?

how is that bullshit? it's truth. if you can't get a 2500k or 2600k to 4.5ghz then it's simply a case of PEBKAC.

>>58260991
>PEBKAC
what did he meant by that

>>58260991
>PEBKAC
explain anon

>>58261067
>>58261114
newfags detected

File: 1476534346600.jpg (57KB, 382x596px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 382x596px

>>58259278
>wccftech

While I want Zen to be fuckin great, if you go to that shithole you're fuckin retarded. They will publish ANYTHING for clicks.

ANYTHING. http://web.archive.org/web/20150413165626/http://wccftech.com/rumor-amd-phenom-iv-x12-170-baeca-25nm-cpu-leaked-features-12-cores-6-ghz-core-clock-am4-socket-compatbility/

>>58259278
>for a single core
lmao

>>58261067
>>58261114
Why don't you faggots stop being new and go back to normieville?

>>58261114
problem exists between keyboard and chair

>>58261067
>>58261114

Problem exists between keyboard and computer

>>58259710

Those things require water cooling.

>>58261067
>>58261114

fuck this board filled w 13 year olds

>>58260991
>dae le PEBCU᠎CK
Fuck off

>>58262697
my usb cable is the problem?

The highest OC atm is an AMD chip at 8GHz. Will Ryzen get to 10GHz?

>>58262534
Other, more reputable, publications confirmed it but it's only on one core. But they said it's because the VRM of their board was the limit, not the CPU itself. We'll have to wait for actual releases and high-end motherboards to see how well RyZen OCs.

>>58262839
It's not just a /g/ thing, this entire site is filled with idiot underages

Just think next time you get in some pointless 4chan argument there's a huge chance that person hasn't even finished school yet

>>58264119
obviously, you needed a bluetooth keyboard

File: C04cojUUoAEndz4.jpg (21KB, 450x320px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 450x320px

>Ryzen can only OC on 1 core

I still don't get all those shitty articles and shilling. They aren't based on anything you can really trust and you'll people will just act
>b-but that wasn't what they promised!
>t-that's not the price they told us!
>t-that's not the performances they told us!
When ofc, AMD said nothing at all.
Same goes for other companies, but for some reason people doesn't care and try to give nvidia or intel some impossible performance / price.

>>58262697

It's "Keyboard and Chair", the computer doesn't sit behind you for you to be between them.

>>58269481
It can also mean 'behind keyboard and computer'

>Can only overclock 1 core

AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

>>58269493

It can, but the "official" meaning and all of its derivatives usually involve chairs:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/PEBCAK

>>58269493
but you don't sit behind the keyboard or pc, you sit in front of it. hurrr durrrrr.

> implying a dogshit company can suddenly build a competitive cpu out of nowhere

it's always the poorest idiots that get tricked into wasting money on dying bullshit

>>58269857
This AMD is true shit historically weaker than Intel

File: cooler-tan.jpg (51KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x500px

where can I find benchmarks to compare 10 year old CPUs (eg Athlon X2) to modern ULV/Atom shit?

>>58259278
Should I post those 8GHz Pentium 4 benchmarks or something? Frequency is nothing without the IPC, and this is a moot point until the release.

File: 6b0a478c2bf496d059a5b68c221365f8c4fd6c92410136d1dcf8fc18eb68d9ed.jpg (28KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 300x300px

>>58270218
||
||
V
>>58259652

>>58259278
>WCCFtech

>>58270282
>IPC has something to do with the number of cores
Ask your parents to unbirth you.

>>58259278
i7 2600k overclocks to 5GHz on air. Everyone BTFO