Crushes everything except the 6900k in brute calculations.

File: 1481748265414.png (591KB, 778x1018px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 778x1018px

>>58191934
>cores and clockspeeds blurred
>again
Pic related for this thread

>>58191934
Give us the link moron.

>>58192018
I found it on hardocp.com, but the results are from www.cpchardware.com.

File: wQnRrqQ.jpg (822KB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

822KB, 2448x3264px

>>58191945

>>58192100
>AMD's new 16 thread CPUs lose to 4 thread Intel CPUs in gaming
Zen is finished.

>>58191934
>8c 12t barely faster than 6c 12t in multi threading
>shit ipc
>can't handle ram faster than 2400


lol

>>58191934
it has got the jidf scared atleast. I've haven't seen the intel shill team this active in a long time

Jewtel finished and bankrupt

>8c/16t
>Beats everything but the 8c/16t competition

WOW
AMAZE

Question is, how much higher can they go with the clockspeed? If it's very limited, they might have a problem, or they can sell it to poorfags at a good price point much like the rx470/480

>>58192100
>performs worse than a i5 6600
I wouldn't pay more than $150 for it

>>58192165
>ES
>beta motherboard
>1Ghz lower clock

>>58192976
Disfigured baby with down syndrome still isn't going to win any beauty pageants when it grows up.

>>58192926
Actually would be hilarious if Radeons would perform better with Ryzen.
Would make sense since overhead is still there, it's a lot better than couple years ago though.
can driver team theoretically make it run better on AMD cpus? they probably didn't even consider doing it since nobody plays on 8350

>>58192994
you are comparing alpha version to complete release

>>58191934
The ES has some bugs with SMT enabled too.
Performance of consumer chips will be marginally higher.

>>58192926
The base clock of the consumer chips will be 3.4ghz at a minimum.

>>58193007
You really think they've made major revisions to the silicon since this? They are already well into production if they expect to release any time in Q1.

>>58193015
Why do you pretend you have some kind of insider information? You know as much as we do about the retail clock speeds - absolutely nothing.

>>58193057
from when do you think that sample?
samples been around since october 2015, at least rumors about it started then

>>58193081
did you miss conference? why would they announce 3.4 base clock and then change it to 3.0?

>>58193057
>this fallacy again
The guy who tested the sample said there is an SMT and uop cache bug. The chip was rated for a 3.5ghz turbo, but never went above 3.4.
The motherboard itself was a pre production sample and had a host of issues.

This A0 rev chip was fabbed in June this year.


>>58193081
Amazing how much of a pretentious faggot child you are considering you're so laughably uninformed.
The CEO of AMD explicitly stated that Ryzen CPUs would have a bare minimum clock of 3.4ghz.
Honestly go slit your wrists wide open. You should die.

File: better5.jpg (8KB, 869x225px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 869x225px

>>58191934

>>58193114
AMD users are mentally ill.

>>58193114
>getting this upset that you much hyped chip turns out to be shit
>b-but they wouldn't lie to me!
I think you need a time out little billy

>>58193175
>>58193176
>I got caught talking out of my ass
>I'll resort to childish shitposting

You legit should die.

>>58193057
>>58193175
>>58193176
6 months old and you think literally nothing has changed with the silicon?

At the very least they've improved base clocks 350Mhz and boost 300Mhz. That's an 11% and 8% increase respectively.

>>58193186
:^)

>>58192165
>8c 12t barely faster than 6c 12t in multi threading
it's also barely slower than the $1100 6900k despite not having final clocks
>shit ipc
same as Broadwell
>can't handle ram faster than 2400
neither can any Intel CPU