So, which is the best? They stop encryption at the beggining.

File: linux (debian).png (26KB, 602x500px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 602x500px

>>58182759

Your brain

You cannot get ransomware unless you deliberately install something shady. In which case you are so dumb even an anti-ransomware program can't help you.

If you have something shady, why not run it in a VM like anyone decent would?

Common Sense

>>58182759
proper backups

>>58182790
>In which case you are so dumb even an anti-ransomware program can't help you.
No, dumbarse... If you have one anti-ransomware it can stop the encryption even after you execute it.

>>58182797
It doesn't help after you execute the ransomware, so it's not a good anti-ransomware.

>>58182828

And you really trust some program with that? What happens if there's a bug that can be exploited? Then you end up ransomed.

>>58182828
Common Sense will prevent you from executing it in the first place

>>58182845
So it's a good anti-malware, not a good anti-ransomware kiddo.

>>58182844
I wouldn't. But I want to know which anti-ransomware is the best in the market right now at that moment.

>>58182790
hahaha, this is what retards believe.

You can get a ransomware by visiting a site that exploits a browser vulnerability, or a flash or java one.

You don't even need to visit a site, hacked sites you trust might be injecting the code to your system that won't activate for months.

Not having proper anti-virus software is retarded.

File: LOSER Meme.png (213KB, 640x359px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 640x359px

OS/X

>>58182759
your brain and linux

>>58183111
Trips of correct reasoning. Very rare on /g/.

Just back up your shit.

>>58182845
i have a rock which protects me from tiger attacks

>>58183413
>and I know how to hide from tigers

>>58182759
Think of ransomware as a secure hard drive wipe.

>>58183111
>2016
>using Flash and Java in the browser

Surfing the web is basically bulletproof as long as your don't download anything and don't run Flash or Java.

>>58182828
Kill yourself, you shit brained baboon.

File: 1481632648709.png (55KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 600x600px

>>58182770
Well that was fast.

>>58185072
Oh, I trigged you with some truth you retarded little fucko?

>>58183595
I just don't jump into the tiger cage at the local zoo.

>>58182770
>he thinks there isn't ransomware that specifically targets Linux distros due to their popularity on servers
Hahahahahahaha

Kill yourself.

>>58186094
this

>>58186094
But how do you get it?

>>58184996
>Surfing the web is basically bulletproof as long as your don't download anything
most reatarded sentence of 2016 right here

>>58186094
Basically pointless to make ransomware for servers, because servers don't open/run PDFs,word docs,installme.exe,cod wallhack,lottery.exe or browse the web.
Users do all the above.

>>58186254
Servers have open ports that can be exploited.

>>58186359
That's true, but if you don't open those ports you're good. If you run an important server then you should have an appropriate backup scheme in place really.

>>58182797
Only the 2016 edition.

Free: Avira
Paid: ESET

>>58186467
Will the upgrade to the 2017 edition be free?

>>58187776
only if wikipedia reaches their goal