I thought that systemd was supposed to speed up boot times? How

>>58159596
That's funny. On Solus it boots in only 5 seconds.

Maybe your distro is just a piece of shit.

File: solus.png (210KB, 825x504px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 825x504px

>>58159660
nice try kevin

>>58159596
>Gentoo
Maybe come back when you have a meaningful desktop with actual stuff installed instead of some super minimal autsm garbage you call "software"

>>58159596
sytemd is for remote SRE's to automate deployment of a bunch of containers using whatever redhat proprietary container mgt software like Google's Kubernetes.

that's all it's for, if you aren't involved in remotely starting and stopping (or automatically) your servers then you don't need it.

>>58159744
well memed my friend. Enjoy your slow boot times and ubuntu bloat.

>>58159596
>*buntu
>fast boot times
Are you fucking retarded?

>>58159596
optimization flags

>>58159923
nice try kevin, you almost got me on that one

>>58159596
Daily reminder that systemd is fucking cancer and needs to die

>>58160060
Nice try NSA/Canonical

>>58160184
but anon, kevin works for canonical and NSA

>>58159660
Startup finished in 1.626s (kernel) + 775ms (initrd) + 1.310s (userspace) = 3.712s
Yup Solus is life

>>58159596
But solus is 3 seconds

>>58159596
Solus boots in 12 seconds off an old 300GB HDD for me in my old c2d pc.

Maybe the problem isn't systemD, but your inability to research and find a distro that caters well to your desires?

>tfw people literally care about how fast their boot time is

File: file.png (6KB, 321x264px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 321x264px

>glorious filters in action

>>58160658
Some of us remember using windows 95 anon.

Also
>tfw people literally care that something is better than something else

>>58159596
Sounds like a bloat and deafault services issue.
Film your OpenRC install booting to login and then install system and film is booting system to login and compare the times. Until then, 2/10 troll thread.

>>58159960
*buntus actually are one of the fastest booting distros due to the way the kernel is configured.

>>58161974
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

>>58161974
>kernel configuration
>affecting boot times significantly

>>58162017
>i have no idea what I'm doing please rape my ass

>>58162034
It does.
Kernel boot time is typically around 2 seconds if it's not too bloated.

>>58162254
See >>58160471

Solus doesn't even take 2s for the kernel.

File: boot.png (39KB, 960x702px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 960x702px

>>58160527
So slower than XP.

>>58162284
Yes. A 1.1GB Linux distro boots slower than a 500MB Windows XP installation. By 3 seconds.

Good job.

>>58162279
The Ubuntu kernel on my x230 takes around 400ms

>>58162304
I'm using Arch and my Linux kernel takes around 200ms on my 2570p.

$ systemd-analyze       
Startup finished in 7.029s (firmware) + 1.046s (loader) + 3.879s (kernel) + 1.743s (userspace) = 13.698s

File: poor-8.png (159KB, 896x705px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 896x705px

>>58159744

>core 2 duo
>nv94
>2016