Should we block all websites which can provide smooth playback

Should we all smash OP's dick and balls into red paste, with claw hammers?

>>58139236
So you defend the fact that a PC from 2004 can play a DVD smooth as fuck, but can't watch a flash video of worse quality?

Even a PC from 1999 can play a DVD.

File: The Gelding Maker.jpg (7KB, 281x281px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 281x281px

smashy smashy, squishy squashy!

>>58139236
Yes

>gpu
Good thing graphics card at that time didn't try to do general purpose computing, video acceleration and other bloat.

>>58139263
Are you retarded?
Computers were sold in 2004, they featured a DVD burner and flash player because they could do both, and retarded webdevs made entire websites in flash.
Not being able to play that stuff smoothly on a relatively recent computer is a result of adobe bloating it up and/or video players adding more "features" (like initial versions of youtube's DASH).

>>58139213
>Should we block all websites which can provide smooth playback on a Pentium 4 and midrange era gpu?
for what purpose?

>>58139213

fuck off

Pentium 4 was goat. sold more then any other processor did

File: bresscott.png (973KB, 801x1500px) Image search: [Google]

973KB, 801x1500px

>>58141333
lel