[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Despite what you anti-apple cucks had to say, these are actually

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 122
Thread images: 20

File: 236542484.jpg (26KB, 717x717px) Image search: [Google]
236542484.jpg
26KB, 717x717px
Despite what you anti-apple cucks had to say, these are actually pretty fucking good.

Prove me wrong.
>>
>>58108486
>t. iToddler
>>
but they aren't

at least not for the price
>>
They are bad because the form factor is bad. Bluetooth buds connected with a wire are better in every single way.
>>
>>58108526
This

I like the fact of not having any wires because that's what I always end up fucking, but they are too fucking overpriced like every Apple© bullshit.
>>
>>58108486
the concept is goo, should be 99.99 USD though
>>
>>58108486
Way too overpriced to end up with the sound quality of the old $10 ear buds. $140 is too much of an additional cost to justify the "NO WIRE GUISE FUTURE" meme.
>>
>>58108486
typical apple product
>>
>>58108518
/thread
>>
>"hang on bro, I have to charge my earphones"
What kind of future have our corporate overlords thrown us into?
>>
>>58108486
Why don't they ban you fucks for your blatant advertising?

And then you say:
>we're just discussing technology

But you're not, your promoting products by one fucking company everytime and there's at least 10 threads a day devoted to a thinly veiled apple cum swapping shit show.

At least put you fuckers in a containment thread.
>>
>>58108718
>charge overnight Sunday
>listen to less than 29 hours of music over the course of a week
>Charge overnight Sunday

>rinse and repeat
>>
>>58108765
>29 hours
>>
>>58108777
how much charge do you think these have, anon?
>>
>>58108783
Not enough to last 29 hours.
>>
>>58108794
>5 hours in battery in each pod
>24 hours in carry case

The pods get recharged every time you finish using them, that's 29 hours.
>>
>>58108765
My point still stands.
>charging earphones
If these were some sort of wonder tech that magically made all your music sound orgasmically good, I could see the point in it. But they're not. They sound the same as any other pair of passively powered earphones, use regular Apple earbuds for comparison. You gain nothing except muh wireless meme and you lose the capability to use them with pretty much every other audio output device around your house, which are standardized to either 3.5 or quarter inch anyway.
>>
>>58108823
what about all the audio output devices in my house with bluetooth? Or the 3.5 bluetooth adapter I have around my house if that's not the case?
>>
>>58108802
The point still stands that you need to charge them.
>>
>>58108845
The way I see it, audio has to get converted to analog anyway, so cutting out the middle man is the best way to do audio. Yeah, Bluetooth and wireless are convenient, but having wires and also having wireless capability aren't as mutually exclusive as Apple is making it seem. Add to that the fact that they're trying to phase out analog connectors, you get more expensive headphones and peripherals cause now they also have to include a DAC (which will inevitably be shit if you want the price to not change). At the end of the day, it HAS to be analog audio that you listen to and no amount of marketing memes will change the fact that there HAS to be a DAC somewhere along the circuit, so getting rid of 3.5 is just about the most "fuck you" thing a company could do. My rant is more about the iPhone 7 and the way phones are progressing, so I can't really fault you if you use these with any other iPhone.
>>
File: 1453051342041.jpg (303KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]
1453051342041.jpg
303KB, 1536x2048px
>>
>>58108486
4 HOUR BATTERY LIFE.
>>
>>58108526
Literally every other bluetooth headset is more expensive than those, dumbass.
>>
File: LeEco-USB-Type-C-earphones.jpg (20KB, 691x746px) Image search: [Google]
LeEco-USB-Type-C-earphones.jpg
20KB, 691x746px
>>58108969
Only €12 and have their own DAC.
>>
File: 1478811057258.jpg (83KB, 957x621px) Image search: [Google]
1478811057258.jpg
83KB, 957x621px
>>58109300
that's not true regards true frog
>>
File: Samsung Gear Circle Manual.png (288KB, 1600x840px) Image search: [Google]
Samsung Gear Circle Manual.png
288KB, 1600x840px
>>58109300
Samsung Gear Circle

Literally available for $50 and are decent
>>
File: 1480895352451.jpg (226KB, 470x496px) Image search: [Google]
1480895352451.jpg
226KB, 470x496px
>>58109344
Apple keked again
>>
I haven't used them but they look hideous, seem easy to misplace, don't use aptX, and are too expensive.
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault.jpg
13KB, 480x360px
>>58108486
>shitty battery life
>controls only works with ios
>sounds like shit
>HAVE TO BE CONECTED TO INTERNET TO USE VOICE COMMANDS WITH SIRI
>not an IEM
>heartbeat sensor for who the fuck knows why
>cannot stay in ears when jogging
>160 dollars, costs more than half for a replacement if you lose ONE, no price for the charge box
>apple cant even get the damn thing to work in the first place
>dumbass shills are going to suck dick for them anyway

And you dare call normal people "cucks".
>>
For 150€ I would totally buy them even though my first and last Apple product was the iPhone 3G. There are no decent alternatives, they all look ugly, have 2 hours battery life, or are super expensive.
>>
>>58108486
Even that diehard applecuck Charles Brownlee youtube nigger shill said he wasn't impressed with them and compared the sound with the $20 airpods that you get.
>>
my work gave me some for free. I like them fuk u g
>>
File: keklife.jpg (44KB, 720x452px) Image search: [Google]
keklife.jpg
44KB, 720x452px
>1.5 hours battery life
>>
>>58109473
>>not an IEM
>more than $10
fucking this
macfags have to turn the volume all the way up to hear something and you can hear their shitty nigger music meters away
>>
>>58108591
They're cheaper than most other options; the samsung version of these is like $60 more and has only 1 hour of battery life before they have to go back in the charging case
>>
>>58109840

Aren't they actually cheaper than *all* analogous products?
>>
>>58109898
There's a $99 product out but its unusable shit
>>
>>58109321
Only works with USB-C things, requires D O N G L E S to work on anything else. Also has the issue of not being able to charge when listening to music. If you have one of the new MacBooks, these might be a good investment, but if you also have a iPhone 7, you now have to carry around two separate earphones.
>>
>>58108486
>battery powered
>equivalent of bluetooth for connection but proprietary so they literally work on nothing
>overhyped cheap shit apple pretends is expensive so they can rip people off
>>
>>58108823
Having these on a plane sure must suck, giving your phone needs to stay in airplane mode.
>>
>>58109344
The fuck is that, are those plugs supposed to go up your nose?
>>
>>58109994

>equivalent of bluetooth for connection but proprietary so they literally work on nothing

Way to showcase, in one line, that you know absolutely nothing about the AirPods.

The AirPods are standard Bluetooth. They'll work on anything. The only thing that's proprietary is the W1 chip inside, which allows for faster and more straightforward pairing (relative to standard Bluetooth) for people in the Apple ecosystem.

They don't get any worse when you use them with something else. They just get better when you use them with an iPhone.
>>
>>58109989
True, I was just showing that you can get a DAC in a pair of earphones/headphones relatively inexpensively...

Apple should drop lightning and move on to USB C though.
>>
>>58108486
From everything I've read, they sound just like the earpods.
The earpods sounded okay for free pack in earphones, but i wouldn't want to pay even 20 dollars for them.

The wireless features would make them reasonable for 30-50, but at that point they really ought to be providing substantially better sound.
Plus, while I didn't find the earpods that uncomfortable, I know plenty of people hated their shape.
>>
>>58108765
vv
>>
File: hahah.png (500KB, 1535x655px) Image search: [Google]
hahah.png
500KB, 1535x655px
>>58108486
>>
>>58110036
The mindset of an apple user
>>
>>58111341

>Apple ships unfinished product
>"HAHAHAGJGHGHF THESE THINGS ARE TERRIBLE APPLE FAGS BTFO SUICIDE WATCH KEK KEK KEK!!!"

>Apple delays product to make sure it works before they ship it
>"HAHAHAGJGHGHF THEY CAN'T MAKE IT WORK APPLE FAGS BTFO SUICIDE WATCH KEK KEK KEK!!!!"

You guys are really retarded. Delaying a product that's having production problems is objectively the right thing to do. Also, they are shipping now, people are receiving them, stores are receiving inventory. So I don't know who's supposed to be "burned" or whatever by this dank meme.
>>
Hell yeah homie. AirPods kick ass. I told you all at the announce, and people just shat on me. Been using my pair for four months now and the idea of using wired headphones for anything but working at my desk (I also have a pair of LCD2s), makes me want to off myself.
>>
>>58109300
Jaybird X3 - $99.99
Bose Soundsport - $99.99
ADV.Sound Model 3 - $79.99
Sony SBH80 - $78.89
>>
>>58111716
But muh wire
>>
>>58108486
They're honestly not bad. Got them for free when my mom got an iPhone and they're my go-to 'everyday use' headphones. Been a few years but they're still going strong.
>>
File: image.jpg (54KB, 1600x800px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
54KB, 1600x800px
>>58112062
That costs extra anon.
>>
Do they sell special dongles just to charge them?
>>
>he's so atrociously bad at cable management that he'll pay $150 for wireless buds
wow.
>>
>>58111341
i bought a pair on BestBuy today, and im getting them Friday.

You just gotta know where to look.
>>
>>58112497
The case charges them
You charge the case with an iphone charger
>>
>>58114101
How much for a replacement case?
>>
>>58108486
How the fuck exactly are those can stay in the ear? I for one always had problems with hanging in eay headphones, they just fall out of my left ear because of how it is. Will I have those problems with AirPods too?
>>
>ITT: People who never have phone calls

I don't enjoy hearing my own underwater voice echo in my skull on a call with silicon tip earphones. Sorry, Apple products are used by people with functioning lives, friends and family. If you spend more than 1 hour a day on the phone like I do, these things are basically perfection.
>>
>>58114179
The cost to replace a single earbud is like $70, i'd say the case will be about $50 if they start selling seperately
>>
>>58114237
Try the regular apple earbuds, which have almost the same shape first
>>
>>58114265
Plantronics voyagers don't have this problem
>>
>4-5hr battery life
They're shit.
>>
>>58114319
The samsung ones have a battery life of 1.5 hours
>>
>>58114302

Neither do the AirPods.
>>
>>58114340
Those are shit too.
>>
>Apple releases a best-in-class product
>while undercutting the wire-free competition
>/g/ makes up tumblrina-tier delusional about specs and usability to deal with asspain

Every year, this has to happen. Its a cycle.
>>
>>5810036
>hurr I'm going to act ignorant
>>
>>58109300
black web bluetooth headset with built in mic - $40
hmdx bluetooth speaker - $30
vivitar bluetooth speaker $10
>more expensive
you sure about that?
>>
>>58114345
Yes, but they also have like no battery life, are worse, and look objectively worse.
>>
>>58108486
they look like penis ear rings
>>
>>58108518
fpbp
>>
File: il_570xN.1104234824_dolg.jpg (49KB, 570x570px) Image search: [Google]
il_570xN.1104234824_dolg.jpg
49KB, 570x570px
>>
>>58112087
They cam out this week applel moron.
>>
>>58114380
>undercutting
>best in class product
I own a pair of Jaybird X3s for 150 USD. Sell me on the airpods. You have 5 minutes.

Go.
>>
>>58112335

dongles
>>
>>58108802
Wait, is it 24 hours for each ear, or do the two ears have to share the 24 hours?
>>
>>58114631

>while undercutting wire-free competition
>wire-free
>Jaybird
>you in charge of reading comprehension
>>
$150 can get you these, battery life for days not hours. retractable chords and actual buttons.
>>
>>58114904

>fucking shit around your head like a retard

You can't possibly defend this.
>>
>>58114927
it goes around your neck, and can be worn under your shirt
>>
>>58108486
If they sound like earpods, then they're garbage, no matter the price
>>
>>58114968

That is even worse. Earbuds connected to wire I could tolerate, but this shit is inexcusable.
>>
>>58115028
then until battery tech improves, you have to have shit battery life or more wire.

good thing about the neck band is that when you are done the buds retract and it's there for easy access, not floppy wires dangling all over or having to dig them out of a pocket
>>
>>58115072

Or you could just have AirPods which last 5 hours on a charge because I don't spend more than 5 hours at any one time on the phone or listening to music. Then take 15 minutes in their case for 3 more hours.

I don't think you realize how fucking uncomfortable and impractical that terrible neck band is. Its some shit from the 90s.
>>
>>58115028
Sounds like some pretty severe autism you have there.
>>
>>58115137
>I don't think you realize how fucking uncomfortable and impractical that terrible neck band is. Its some shit from the 90s.

yeah, I don't realize because i've been wearing it daily for nearly a year at work.

advertised 5 hours is probably generous, and will only decrease with time, even more so if the case is fast charging them.
>>
>>58115153

If you don't like a plastic bar around your neck you have autism? Ok buddy.

>>58115196

I'm glad you've gotten used to your collar. The 5 hour rating is accurate.
>>
>>58114711
24 hours for each ear
>>
>>58114711
>>58115651

Holy shit you people are so fucking retarded. It is simple. Each individual AirPod can go for 5 hours. The case has the capacity to charge both AirPods 8 more times.
>>
>>58115733
That's literally what i fucking said
>>
Just buy some skullcandy™ earbuds for like 10-20$. When they eventually break (they will they are pretty much designed too) buy the same pair again and trade your old broken ones in for the new ones by using your receipt for the new ones you just purchased. Infinite earbuds.
>>
>>58114863
You failed ipageet, I'm walking out of the apple store and it's your loss in revenue. You turn around and see your manager looking at you strangely. What do you say to him.

Go.
>>
>>58108486
The fact that you can get stuff way better for half the price proves you wrong.
The fact that you posted these shill meme crapphones without even considering entering any page like headfi proves me that you have no idea what is good quality.
>>
>>58108486

When I go jogging in the morning and suddenly one of my air pods falls out of my ear into the snow and I have to pay $70 to replace just one of them...

That's when.
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (66KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
66KB, 1280x720px
>only 5 hour charge
CMON WHAT THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSED TO DO FOR MY 8 HOUR ARM WORKOUT
>>
From the connectivity aspect, they seem great. If they're identical in sound to the EarPods though, not sure I'd be willing to spend money on them (since to me it's very noticeable that things sound muffled in the EarPods).

Also not sure if I'd use them on my laptop/desktop - websites unexpectedly blurting out sanic are pretty common these days, in which case I might as well just use EarPods.
>>
>>58114513
suck my fucking dick you fucking retard
>>
>>58116546
Buy some Jaybird X3s and call it a day
>>
>>58116616
>t. mactoddler
>>
>>58115863

Good evening sir. Thank you for your interest in Jaybird wireless headphones, any question you think I may possible answer for you regarding Jaybird wireless headphone sir?
>>
>>58108486
Earbuds, by design, are shit.
>>
>>58111359
Underrated
>>
Call me crazy but I actually like having the wire around the back. If you need to take them off temporarily (talking to someone quickly) you can just wear em around your neck.
>>
File: IMG_1985 - Copy.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1985 - Copy.jpg
2MB, 4032x3024px
>>58111341
Thousands of people bought them so they're on backorder now silly goose
>>
File: tipsm'fedora.jpg (16KB, 231x244px) Image search: [Google]
tipsm'fedora.jpg
16KB, 231x244px
>>58108486
Zero repairability and and poor build quality. Quite unimpressive, really. Of all the things that need to be wireless or should be wireless, earbuds are not one. It's a stupid product by an equally stupid company. Having yet another thing to charge is retarded. I'd rather deal with a small wire that I can tuck into my shirt than fuck around with bluetooth trash that needs to be charged, paired, and looked after all the time. Those earbuds would be another thing getting in my way. On top of that, they're expensive.

Super shit product, 0/10.

>>58108753
This.
>>
I do have to admit, they are really neat. It's a rare revolutionary device Apple made, especially with thier record ever since Steve bit the dust. While there are no wire Bluetooth earbuds, these are a hell of a lot better. The only gripe I have about them is price.
>>
File: 1478057906409.png (449KB, 870x780px) Image search: [Google]
1478057906409.png
449KB, 870x780px
>>58114973

this guy gets it

in the {current year} iem's are pretty much perfected. My 10 dollar Phillips SHE3590 sound amazing and 40 dollar Earpods sound like shit.

How the fuck can apple engineer the w1 chip dac and battery tech into that form factor and get the acoustics so wrong.

Someone is obviously cucking apple with all the good headphone patents and they had to come up with a sonic workaround to get the mediocre earpod/airpod design.
>>
>>58108765

>29 hours

Fucking filthy plebians not getting at least minimum 100 hours of uninterrupted music sesh a week

I hope your Apple product shorts out and fries your brain or the battery blows up in your ears and deforms you
>>
>>58108753
G is already a containment board.
>>
>>58118120
>G
>>
>>58108518

ASPURGERS.
>>
>>58108486
Can you pirate software on a Mac?
>>
>>58108518
This
>>
Oh someone help me I lost an airpod, it drops from my ear
>>
File: IMG_0191.jpg (42KB, 213x292px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0191.jpg
42KB, 213x292px
>>58109080
>>
Ironically the sound on LTT's review video of the airpods was awful.
>>
>>58108518
FP
>>
The gimmicks are great. Typical Apple.

They look and sound like shit though.
>>
File: 1478895706134.jpg (28KB, 578x523px) Image search: [Google]
1478895706134.jpg
28KB, 578x523px
>>58108486
>>they are good
>>prove me wrong
>he says he something is good and instead of saying how its good he is telling people on a Mongolian Ice fishing forum (where max of 2 people bought this shit) to prove him wrong
>>
They sound like shit, have shitty build quality and a premium price


I don't know about you but I'd prefer a good sound signature comfort and build quality.
Thread posts: 122
Thread images: 20


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.