Is it botnet? Firefox is kill for me and there are no other non-meme

Chromium is botnet. If you want a non-botnet Chromium then you have either the suspicious Iridium browser or the buggy as hell ungoogled-chromium fork.

>>58051369
How much of a botnet?

File: ayushguptalllll.jpg (145KB, 1214x714px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1214x714px

>tfw I couldn't figure out how to install it on Windows and gave up

>>58051427
According to the ungoogled-chromium github page:

>A number of features or background services communicate with Google servers despite the absence of an associated Google account or compiled-in Google API keys. Furthermore, the normal build process for Chromium involves running Google's own high-level commands that invoke many scripts and utilities, some of which download and use pre-built binaries provided by Google. Even the final build output includes some pre-built binaries. Fortunately, the source code is available for everything.

According to the Iridium page:
>Chromium (which Iridium is based on) is a very secure browser, yes. But it does call home to Google. And we did even more to enhance security to the maximum extent possible.

File: 1482020119.png (256KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1366x768px

>>58051329

B-but op, firefox is so comfy...

>>58051467
Yeah I've read those, but neither provide actual proof or source

>>58051487
I love Firefox but they dropped ALSA support and I'm not installing PulseCancer on my system

>>58051517
Pulse used to be cancer, but it matured. Give it a try, anon.

>>58051517
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=498272
Was deemed as a feature by the devs.

>>58051369
>start up Iridium right after installing
>it opens tabs from firefox that i closed a few days ago
no thanks

>>58051620
There was a time it phoned home to Iridium's servers for "development purposes", that's why I said it's suspicious.

Vivaldi

>>58051369
What about SRWIron?