Okay, niggas, it has been too long. I know there are people here

>>58003591
>about to
about time to

I don't mind flat design. As long as it looks nice and works properly.

>>58003591
Eh i like Google's approach of Material Design.

the flat clusterfuck abortion that microsoft made with powerpoint is fucking disgusting though

Microshit's flat design is good even though Windows 8 was an abomination.

>>58003591
Spoken like a true Linux user

Nobody will ever your that trash of yours, it looks like shit, it works like shit, and the reason behind that is all you self-titled "programmers" lack even basic ability to design anything ranging from general system architecture to GUI

So go ahead, complain some more about flat design or whatever normal people deem acceptable, then go tinker with your hobbyist OS

File: 7BIlFccT.jpg (17KB, 400x327px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 400x327px

>>58003757
>can't form basic English sentences
>flies into fits of autistic rage on a Ugandan topiary forum

>>8003787
Hit too close to home? Tough luck bro, maybe it's you who should kys

>>58003591
I don't really like it either, I am more of a fan of the style that Mac OS is now. It's not exactly flat but its still minimal

>>58003591
>I like glossy shadows gimmicks

>>58003591
It looks like shit, for one

It usually makes it difficult to determine what's what on the screen

>>58003876
No one said or implied that

>>58003876
>I adhere to the "less is less" philosophy

Why is it always so bloated? Every single website with flat design i have visited some years ago must have like twenty million lines of javascript, and many sites that move to that trend remove a lot of convenient links to useful parts of a site, requiring more clicks for navigation, or in the worst situation, if the link is removed completely from the interface, and you lose the URL or there's no sitemap you can only wave goodbye to that part of the site.
And i wouldn't mind it so much if it only affected normie sites like Youtube or Facebook, there's also the "we made our site about PC software easier to navigate on mobile :DDDD" shit.

>>58003876
>how to spot a triggered flatfag even if no one names skeuomorphism

>>58004079
>Why is it always so bloated?
you just need to upgrade from your cum encrusted neetpad to something that can actually handle a modern web browser

>>58004251
Great ad hominem famiglia
Proof that flat design apologists can't read

>>58003717
The problem is it is pushed for huge screens.
I had no problem with Metro as it was for WP. It's just WP went to shit.

>>58003757
Nothing you said was untrue, but I have no idea why any of that should make you angry

File: la capitaine.png (228KB, 1500x940px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1500x940px

>>58003757

I have the "La Capitain" icon theme on Mint, looks pretty cool desu senpai

>>58003896
This.

>>58003717
It's pretty but I know it's ugly on the inside

File: file.png (54KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x480px

any design after the 2000s fucking sucks

this looks fucking fantastic

especially how things got later, Winamp looked fucking amazing pre-bento

firefox used to look really good

XP was a fantastic looking OS even though its colors were a bit off

what things are missing these days is gradient, texture, depth, ect. Everything is flat shapes and colors and it doesn't look good at all

Windows Vista was the start of everything looking like shit

>>58007233
Windows 2000 icon pack looked much better desu.