Where were you when the machines took over? https://arxiv.o

>>57980195
it would still fail on recognizing JAV actors

>all this reading
Aint got battery life for that. Sum it up op. Are the second set of images created by machine learning?

>>57980195
that last picture is insane in the membrane

>>57980322
>JAV actors

"This image is a plastic surgery train wreck with fucked teeth"

>>57980515
Both first and second set. They use two networks to generate the images adding more details the second time.

Google's image search function has done this for a decade.

>Synthesizing photo-realistic images from text descriptions is a challenging problem in computer vision and has many practical applications. Samples generated by existing text-to-image approaches can roughly reflect the meaning of the given descriptions, but they fail to contain necessary details and vivid object parts. In this paper, we propose stacked Generative Adversarial Networks (StackGAN) to generate photo-realistic images conditioned on text descriptions. The Stage-I GAN sketches the primitive shape and basic colors of the object based on the given text description, yielding Stage-I low resolution images. The Stage-II GAN takes Stage-I results and text descriptions as inputs, and generates high resolution images with photorealistic details.
I wonder if you can trick it into making hybrid species
>>57980592
no it fucking hasn't

>>57980630
big shit

its not AI, its just a quite complex algorithm that probably has several feather texture and bird shapes in its machine learned database and its just randomly selecting from a set that matches the description

>>57981028

>That luddite in denial in ever AI thread

Why do you even come to the technology board?

>>57980195
How long until /gd/ /ic/ are put on suicide watch?