>unsolved 15 years bug In Chrome, you can simply close any

Well yea, Chrome was designed by the NSA so of course it's more efficient. It needs to be more efficient since they use it to spy on billions of people

They have access to technology that poor losers at Mozilla will never have

Why should it be? Undo closed tab feature is quite useful.

>>57957357
>not using a custom chromium dist

>>57957357
>freeing memory and resources in a fucking web browser is an extremely advanced technique that only a governmental agency have the means to make it possible
>but not freetards on their spare time
Really makes you think...

File: fuck this gay thread.gif (88KB, 10000x10000px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 10000x10000px

>>57957340
>Status: verified fixed
>Product: Seamonkey
Can Chrome shills even read? Not that it matters anyway, because even with this "bug", Seamonkey is ridiculously lightweight for its amount of features and customization.

>>57957773
Firefox was part of Seamonkey. Mozilla decided to split Seamonkey into two different products: Firefox and Thunderbird.

Learn history and use brain before posting.

Chromeshills have been very active lately.
I'm not joining your botnet.

>VERIFIED FIXED
>Product: Seamonkey
>using internet explorer
anon fuck off.

File: Capture.png (7KB, 858x326px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 858x326px

>>57957773
>open that big ass image
>5 tabs crash
Chromium ftw xd

>>57958580
>malicious website spamming popups in one tab
>blocks every other tab in the browser
>still blocks every other tab even after killing and restarting Chrome
B-BUT MUH FOXFIRE SUH-JUH-WUHS

>>57958580
only the tab that opened it crashed for me.

But it's kinda expected considering the dimensions. It's 10000x10000 pixels in gif format

Chrome only supports static images up to 16,384x16,384, so I suspect the support for gif dimensions is even lower.

>>57957773
Lol, that image made my Chrome CPU usage go up to 50% on a 4670k.

>>57959467
My CPU use went from 15% to 31%

>>57959407
>>57959467
Literally loaded in under 5 seconds using Firefox and barely caused a 2% increase in performance on a dual core laptop cpu.

Going to try to load the same image in chromium and report back with results.