>mfw i realize the only reason you guys don't support

File: serveimage(24).jpg (188KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 960x1280px

>mfw I'm a sysadmin

Get fucked dumb drakeposter.

>>57933063
this
OP is a faggot but had delivered truth

>>57933063
The irony.
>Hahaha, I'm looking forward to robots taking away your lower-class jobs! My job will be safe :^)
>Omg, don't make programming so easy that everyone can do it, you will drive down wages and make me lose my job

>>57933063
Fuck off, you dumb fuck.

>>57933063
We already have Pajeet, dont need to teach other monkeys

File: 9743570496_bda32b8df1_b.jpg (407KB, 575x1024px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 575x1024px

>>57933063
little kids forget about coding and want to be a policeman instead

>>57933638
Emergency service jobs would unironically be safer from total machine replacement because people would understandably be hesitant to place their lives in the hands of an uncaring machine. They would be assisted by machines, but not replaced totally.

>>57933063

A 12 year old can also work an assembly line or probably be a decent data analyst or a Excel monkey.

In fact, I think the world underestimates children. They should be put to work sooner.

I mean be real with yourselves. Could you not teach a 12 year old your job?

>>57933063
Well, no op. You got it all wrong. Programming is not just throwing words together. Programming also requires technical knowledge about hardware, networking, cryptography, ... If you cant design a basic processor using logic simulators, don't know how to build amplifiers and how transistors work, don't know linear algebra, statistics, algorithmic difficulty, analysis and other subjects that make up the theoretical base then you are a hopeless programmer who is only able to bind data to forms and who will fail any task that actually requires technical understanding.

>>57933870
>fail any task that actually requires technical understanding.
99 % of the jobs don't need this though.