Oompa Loompa, do-ba-dee-doo I've got a perfect puzzle for

>Oompa Loompas
>not Grunka Lunkas
What the fuck is wrong with you?

>>57920748
He's a bit autistic and so are you oompa loompa do ba da dee

>>57920672
Oompa Loompa, do-ba-dee-doo

Have you tried installing gentoo?

>>57920672
I don't care if it was a "classic", it was a shitty movie.

>>57923466
You're a fucking shitty movie.

>>57920672
>>57920748
>>57920773
>>57923432
>>57923466
>>57923525
shitposts can be quite entertaining sometimes i must say

>>57923466
how?

>>57923561
cliche wish-fulfillment story. Boring melodrama. heavy-handed morality. It's blindingly obvious who the good guys and bad guys are and the good people win in the end and everything is rainbows and unicorn farts. There's not one shred of ambiguity or mystery in the whole thing. It was predictable even when I was a grade schooler.

>>57923596
this is why we can't have nice things
just shutup and enjoy the art, it was hardly about the story you nitwit

>>57923561
Shitty props.
The candy looked like fucking plastic.

>>57923655
if your movie has a shitty plot then its bad art. the same way your book is not great literature if it has a shitty plot.

>>57923694
>The candy looked like fucking plastic.
Have you ever been to a candy store? Real candy looks like fucking plastic. Some of it borders on being actual plastic.

>>57923466
This so much

Why do people jack off over this shit film? Is it just nostalgiafags?

File: 1454779369578.jpg (379KB, 1312x1488px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1312x1488px

>Allow /v/ toddlers
>Board turns into a complete joke
MODS WTF

>>>/global/rules/6
>>>/global/rules/3

>>57923695
the book was different
the movie was just a propaganda shitfest for children, with dumb jingles and trippy effects.