Should I care about G-SYNC / FREESYNC? I'm going to replace

I'd go for a high refresh rate (120hz+) before adaptive sync.

>>57902260
Would I REALLY notice it though? Would my eyes really see the difference? I doubt it...

I can't seem to find many good (and non-ugly) monitors with that refresh rate anyway

File: 1462523727210.png (40KB, 803x399px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 803x399px

>>57902313
I had a buddy who bought into the gsync meme, it's honestly barely noticeable. Certainly not worth the price premium on the monitors. Haven't tried freesync but the monitors for that are cheap at least.

Honestly vsync is going to be good enough for most people

>>57902397
Thanks for confirming, I always felt it was a meme

I'd rather have a decent quality screen with accurate colors than some placebo 2ms for when I play 30 minutes of CSGO

>>57902589
I have a freesync 144hz. Honestly if you have a good cpu, you will notice a huge difference man. Night and day. I can't go back to 60hz or 75hz. My eyes kinda bother

>>57902397
Where did you find this ghotl?

>>57902640
>CPU
How is that relevant? I hope you meant GPU, otherwise I don't think I can take you seriously bro...

How do your eyes bother? Sounds to me like you're suffering from placebo and buyers remorse

>>57902397
>>57902313
G sync free sync won't make things look better, if you have screen tearing it fixes it. If you don't, it doesn't do much
I say yes on high refresh rate though, it makes a bigger difference than high res imo (although 1440p 144hz is nice)

>>57904476
When I show my friends the monitor they don't even notice it's higher res, but the Hz is really nice on the eyes. I can tell between a 20hz difference even up to 144hz if I focus, but during gameplay anything above 100hz looks sufficiently smooth for me