Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: nanomachine neuron.jpg (22KB, 400x225px) Image search:
[Google]
22KB, 400x225px
Are you ready for when they spray us with nano machines that once inhaled envelope our neurons and can read our electrical firing signals and even induce our neurons to fire remotely through quantum broadcasting techniques? Are you ready for when the matrix goes wireless and nano?
http://singularityhub.com/2016/12/05/the-brain-tech-to-merge-humans-and-ai-is-already-being-developed/
>"In the early 2030s," Ray said, "we are going to send nanorobots into the brain (via capillaries) that will provide full immersion virtual reality from within the nervous system and will connect our neocortex to the cloud. Just like how we can wirelessly expand the power of our smartphones 10,000-fold in the cloud today, we'll be able to expand our neocortex in the cloud."
>A few weeks ago, I asked Bryan about Ray’s prediction about whether we’d be able to begin having our neocortex in the cloud by the 2030s.
>His response, “Oh, I think it will happen before that.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnaTtsClgc4
http://www.sentientdevelopments.com/2009/04/welcome-to-machine-part-4-kurzweils.html
>>
>>57860711
yeah I can finally live in 2D world
>>
>>57860711
In his book, The Singularity is Near, futurist Ray Kurzweil describes how a nanotechnology powered neural network could give rise to the ultimate virtual reality experience. By suffusing the brain with specialized nanobots, he speculates that we will someday be able to override reality and replace it with an experience that's completely fabricated. And all without the use of a single brain jack.
>>
>>57860711
>First, we have to remember that all sensory data we experience is converted into electrical signals that the brain can process. The brain does a very good job of this, and we in turn experience these inputs as subjective awareness (namely through consciousness and feelings of qualia); our perception of reality is therefore nothing more than the brain's interpretation of incoming sensory information.
>Now imagine that you could stop this sensory data at the conversion point and replace it with something else.
>That's where the nano neural net comes in. According to Kurzweil, nanbots would park themselves near every interneuronal connection coming in from our senses (sight, hearing, touch, balance, etc.). They would then work to 1) halt the incoming sensory signals (not difficult -- we already know how to use "neuron transistors" that can detect and suppress neuronal firing) and 2) replace these inputs with the signals required to support a believable virtual reality environment (a bit more challenging).
>As Kurzweil notes, "The brain does not experience the body directly." As far as the conscious self is concerned, the sensory data would completely override the feelings generated by the real environment. The brain would experience the synthetic signals just as it would the real ones.
>>
ITT: inaccurate, ridiculously optimistic "predictions"
>>
>>57860744
ray kurzeil has made over a hundred predictions 86% of which have been right on the money.
>>
>>57860744
all the big names are already working on hacking into your brain.
https://www.inverse.com/article/20322-elon-musk-neural-lace-progress
>>
>enabling the neuronal jew
>2016
>>
>>57860711
ray kurzweil AKA "URRRRRR SUPERSTRONG AI GOD IS COMING IN 30 YEARS" for the past 30 years
into the trash it goes
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1