Hey /g/ do you have your constant on the left or right? such

lefts for autists

File: print.png (4KB, 1068x34px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 1068x34px

>>57845072
right, it's much more readable and logical even though they're the same

>>57845072
On the right. Otherwise, it's inverting "if x is 5 ..." for no good reason.

>>57845089
"IF FIVE IS X" is indeed high autistry.

>>57845072

is this a serious question?

Left guarantees not accidentally using the assignment operator.

Right is more readable.

I generally tend to put it on the right.

>>57845072
that's a literal not a constant faggot

>>57845072
You actually scanned this disk for 22 days?

As for the question, putting rvalues on the left will save you from "= instead of ==" errors slipping by only to be discovered hours later.

>>57846058
Depends on the what the actual language is. Most people seem to miss this, but in pure C the only literals are string literals, everything else that's called a literal in, say, C++ is a constant in C. It can get confusing because people often also refer to const variables or preprocessor macros (such as "#define FOO 42" as "constants".

>>57845072
if you do it the way
> if 5 == shit
you get an error if you accidentally write
> if 5 = shit

thats nice.

Yoda conditionals.

>>57845072
>1TB disk
>0.5 MB/sec
>Elapsed Time 5:33
>Damaged Blocks 100%
seems legit and not photoshoped at all

>>57847152
c has array literals of every kind in c99, i think

Constant on the left is for old AT&T assemblyfags

>>57845072
>having it on the left

I never even imagined such high autistery, have anyone seen this in rl?