>not using clear linux in 2016
>the best performance on linux distro
What are you waiting for?
I think it is one of the most interesting distros to come along in a while.
It's made by intel and everything's compiled for speed. The intel backing puts it in a similar position as Fedora where professionals are maintaining it.
If they keep expanding the available packages and get listed on distrowatch, I could see it gaining traction until it is one of the popular distributions.
neat
im gonna try clear linux on my FX8320
But is it botnet?
>>57844855
Only when it detects amd hardware.
>>57844768
THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN
>>57844768
>a compiled distro for only intel cpus
>test on a amd cpu
Are you kidding?
>>57844727
>It's made by intel and everything's compiled for intel processors and to work slower on AMD's processors
fixed
>>57844445
> Cloud Integrated Advanced Orchestrator
> Cloud
>read getting started article
>"this image enables telemetry by default"
Nice try NSA.
>>57844445
>gaming on Linux
>Not benchmarking Vulkan API games
retards
>>57844768
holy fuck you are brave
godspeed comrade
>>57845151
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implying normie engineers know how to use a good graphics API
hahahaha
haha
ha
My computer already performs well enough.
product="Clear Linux* OS for IntelĀ® Architecture"
script_name=${0##*/}
check_result() {local ret="$1"
local msg="$2"
[ "$ret" -ne 0 ] && { echo "FAIL: $msg"; exit 1; }
echo "SUCCESS: $msg"}
have_kernel_module() {local module="$1"
[ -d /sys/module/"$module" ]}
get_cpuinfo() { # return details of the first CPU only
cat /proc/cpuinfo | awk 'BEGIN { RS = "" ; } { printf ("%s\n", $0); exit(0); }'}
have_intel_cpu() {local need="Intel CPU"
get_cpuinfo | grep -q GenuineIntel
check_result "$?" "$need"}
have_cpu_feature() {local feature="$1"
get_cpuinfo | egrep -q "^flags.*\<$feature\>"}
have_efi() {local need="EFI firmware"
[ -d /sys/firmware/efi ]
check_result "$?" "$need"}
have_kvm() {local module=
for module in "kvm" "kvm_intel"; do
have_kernel_module "$module"
check_result "$?" "Kernel module $module"
done}
have_nested_kvm() {local file=/sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested
[ -f "$file" ] && [ $(cat "$file") = Y ]
check_result "$?" "Nested KVM support"}
have_vmx() {local feature="vmx"
local desc="Virtualisation support"
local need="$desc ($feature)"
have_cpu_feature "$feature"
check_result "$?" "$need"}
have_minimum_cpu_feature() {local feature="sse4_1"
local desc="Streaming SIMD Extensions v4.1"
local need="$desc ($feature)"
have_cpu_feature "$feature"
check_result "$?" "$need"}
have_64bit_cpu() {local feature="lm" # "Long mode"
local desc="64-bit CPU"
local need="$desc ($feature)"
have_cpu_feature "$feature"
check_result "$?" "$need"}
common_checks() {have_intel_cpu && have_64bit_cpu && have_minimum_cpu_feature}
check_host() {echo "Checking if host is capable of running $product"; echo
common_checks && have_efi}
check_container() {echo "Checking if host is capable of running $product in a container"; echo
common_checks && have_vmx && have_kvm && have_nested_kvm}
main() {case "$1" in
container) check_container ;;
host) check_host ;;
*) echo "ERROR: Invalid type specified: '$1' (specify 'host' or 'container')" 2>&1; exit 1 ;;
esac}
main "$@" && exit 0
>>57844445
This looks interesting. I'd like to try and boot it but I got class in the morning. How is this different than just using a high o flag in gentoo?
>>57846134
According to source codes everything is compiled with Intel's compiler and golang.
>>57846159
But is Intel's faster than GCC? I've seen benchmarks that show significant performance increases from the "-o3" cflag or whatever it is in gentoo.
I can see one big advantage is that everything is compiled already. When I read the article with those benchmarks I mentioned the first thing that came to mind was "why doesnt someone just pre-optimize binaries?"
how do I download this shit?
can't find ISO and this IMG are like 300mb
>>57844895
>AMD processor
But it's already slower
Already do.
It's called Solus. Ikey is a core member of clear Linux at Intel in Dublin and uses clear Linux shit on solus.