stop and appreciate that linux users are autistic enough to make

>>57817110
>quite literally the same package with one character slightly changed

>ARGHHH I HATE CHOICE: The thread

>>57817253
>I care about a line vs a dot in 1 out of hundreds of characters: the post

>>57817110
>aur
Nothing surprises me about the autism of Arch users like OP. However, please don't include the rest of us in this, OP.

>>57817269
I care because O (let's see if the letter is still filtered on /g/) is a letter in Danish and Norwegian.

>>57817269
I do, and I prefer fonts where 0 is slashed but I understand users of Scandinavian languages where slashed O is a thing so obviously they could prefer dotted 0.

Again, what's so bad about having choice you cumguzzling faggot?

>>57817110
Why even use more than a single font anywhere? Everything should be absolutely centralized, there should be 0 (dotted) choice when it comes to anything computer related and we should just see Arial everywhere.

>>57817364
>Arial everywhere
That would be an absolute nightmare.

For programming it is absolutely an requirement to use a fixed width-fixed spacing font due to indentation and spacing and dealing with strings etc.

For reading long texts, especially compact paragraphs, a serif font is a requirement because it eases the reader's ability to follow the line.

For headlines and infographics and whatever, sans-serif fonts like Helvetica (Arial for Windows plebs) is superior.

>>57817419
I think that was the point of his post bub.

>>57817429
Well, I'm autistic apparently.

Which is why I didn't get his irony and why I prefer having a choice when it comes to fonts.