It's been one year since the new Google logo replaced the

still weirded out but less so. it's more in line with the material design thing

>>57645256
I hate it as i hate Google

Needs a double storey g.

>>57645256
I liked the old logo better.

But I never go to Google.com anyways so it doesn't affect me.

>>57645256

It makes me feel cold and empty

>>57645256
serifs are so much better in this situation

New logo was always fine to me. It's the new favicon that's shit.

File: language murder.jpg (74KB, 1024x549px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1024x549px

>first they came for the cursive
>then the came for the serifs
>now everything is CIA nigger writing

fuck, now I know how China felt when they were forced to use Simplifed Chinese

>>57645256
I guess it was a right move forward.

They already reached the peak at the flat colored serif logo already by that time, so it only made sense. Mind you, I really disliked that they moved away from those serif contours, but if they didn't, they would be stuck on that same shape they already fleshed out and still would have to make that kind of transition anyway. That's what they must've been thinking.

>>57645256
What really grinds my gears though is that they still can't accept the fact that their app icons will not have the same shapes ever.
Instead of putting more emphasis on consistency of their designs, they decide to put all of their icons in a circle this time. Truly a beta test company.

File: 1460076766909.png (86KB, 600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 600x1200px

>mfw

>>57645256

I don't give a shit because I only use cuck cuck go

>>57645256
Smaller svg was the reason of change.
http://gizmodo.com/how-could-googles-new-logo-be-only-305-bytes-while-its-1728793790

took like a week or two to not mind it
still looks bad thou

I hate everything about current graphic design trends.

>>57645256
I still like it.

>>57645362
fucking this gggggggggggg

I much prefer it. The new lowercase g especially.

>>57648713
FUCK YOU!

File: googlelogo_color_272x92dp.png (6KB, 272x92px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 272x92px

>>57647214
And yet their logo is 5.8 KiB.

File: 1479921608630.png (6KB, 272x92px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 272x92px

>>57649576

File: 1479921608630-fs8.png (2KB, 272x92px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 272x92px

>>57649739

File: 1479921608630-fs8.png (1KB, 272x92px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 272x92px

>>57649803

I still occasionally close google search tabs because the favicon makes me mistake them for some clickbait site.
It just looks cheap.

But fuck, one year?
I don't believe.

>>57649576
retard

It's shit

>>57645256
Did they really need to make it look like something you'd see printed on a fisher-price toy?

>>57645366
Literally this what the fuck

I don't use google products and I replaced google's search engine with Bing

It's kinda childlike, inspiring trust and creativity
It's so cute that they just want to sell me things.

meanwhile:
>Quite a bit of software is to be developed to match digital identities with the actual voter file with high confidence. The key unit of the campaign is a "voter", and each and every record is viewable and updatable by volunteers in search of more accurate information.
>Build tools that measure the rate and spread of stories and rumors, and model how it works and who has the biggest impact. Tools can tell us about the origin of stories and the impact of any venue, person or theme.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262#source

> It was at this point that I realized Eric Schmidt might not have been an emissary of Google alone. Whether officially or not, he had been keeping some company that placed him very close to Washington, DC, including a well-documented relationship with President Obama. Not only had Hillary Clinton’s people known that Eric Schmidt’s partner had visited me, but they had also elected to use her as a back channel.
https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/