Greetings, i have been tasked with tapping a landline for someone

>>57641107
Good one buddy

Ask your mom, I tapped her last night.

>>57641159
>Ask your mom, I tapped her last night.
/Thread

you can split the wires between the wall and the phone, connect them to a 3.5mm jack and plug it into a tape recorder's microphone input

protip: it's only legal if at least one person in the phone call is aware it's being recorded

>>57641240
>protip: it's only legal if at least one person in the phone call is aware it's being recorded
Then it's not wiretapping. Also nice blanket legal advice, you fucking moron, because that isn't true everywhere.

>>57641253
4chan is an american website intended only for US citizens

>>57641107

The 80s called. It wants its autism back.

how advanced are you trying to get

Remote tap or local tap

does the person have a land line or is it VOIP though ISP or VOIP though vonage/magicjack

how much physical access do you have to phone/house

>>57641301
If you were an American you'd know there were states and in those states the laws may differ.

>>57641240
>you can split the wires between the wall and the phone, connect them to a 3.5mm jack and plug it into a tape recorder's microphone input
That wont work you tard. There are plenty of circuit schematics available online, or 3rd parties who sell boxes to allow you to do this.

>protip: it's only legal if at least one person in the phone call is aware it's being recorded
Not in all states you tard, in IL that is still illegal, even recording conversations face to face is illegal.

>>57641107
Assuming a residence, access the TNI box which is almost always outside

>>57641446
Recording conversations is only illegal if you're on private property, otherwise public is public. How does this apply with calling on the phone though?

File: 1304376955947.png (457KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 600x450px

>>57641240
>>57641253
>>57641412
>>57641446
>>57641570

>/g/
>caring about legality

>>57641570
>Recording conversations is only illegal if you're on private property
No. If a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy is the qualifying factor. Who owns the physical space is irrelevant.

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=072000050K14-2

>>57641107
Clip-on hall sensor-based device. A little googling should point you in the right direction.

>>57641412
Telecom syatems are interstate so laws surrounding them are federal

>>57643207
No.

>>57641107

Federal offense, you're getting serious prison time