Is photoshop dead, /g/?
Who will use memetier cloudware when an alternative actually exists?
What's it called ya goose
>>57622645
Read the filename, ya quack.
>>57622431
I used to use Corel Paintshop pro a long time ago
this belongs in gd more, but how does it compare to gimp etc. Surely its better since it's 70 bucks
>>57622768
Are you Canadian? It's 50 bucks here in Burgerland.
>>57622431
>Who will use memetier cloudware when an alternative actually exists?
I wish there was a Linux alternative (I can't stand Windows and if I was on Windows, I'd use cracked PS anyway).
But Affinity Photo looks really good.
https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/photo/
>>57622431
Thanks, OP. D/L'ing now.
Beta software, for beta males.
>>57622795
>Special offer. Was $49.99 - Now only $39.99
>>57622795
Where are you seeing it this cheap?
>>57622768
>Fork GIMP
>Change name and logo
>Close source
>Sell for 80 bucks
>"I'm sure it's better cuz it's 80 bucks"
Neo-/g/ babbies, everyone
>>57622768
>>57622795
It's not even for sale yet I don't think
I'm just using the beta desu
I even made a pepe!
>>57622818
>>57622823
https://itunes.apple.com/app/Affinity_Photo/id824183456?mt=12&ign-mpt=uo%3D4
$50
>>57622837
This doesn't look like GIMP at all.
Can use 10minute mail to get download link.
Requires .NET 4.6.2. Installer will d/l it if not present. Size: 281MB + .NET
>>57622867
It's on the Mac already. 50 bucks seems like a good price for photo editing software.
>>57622837
What makes you think it's a gimp fork?
i've always used paint.net
>prettysatisfied.jpg
>>57622952
He didn't say that, he said that the price is irrelevant to the quality of software.
>Surely its better since it's 70 bucks
If Microsoft sold paint.exe for 70 bucks it wouldn't make it better than the current paint.exe.
>>57622952
>It's
>>57622869
What do you mean? I was pointing out the fact that you are retarded if you think price is directly correlated to software quality. If anyone makes a GIMP spin-off with different name and theme and sells it for $700 it does not mean the software is instantly better.
Stop acting like a mactard
>>57623028
>If Microsoft sold paint.exe for 70 bucks it wouldn't make it better than the current paint.exe
I bet the windows 10 pajeets here from the speccy threads would buy and shill it anyway.
GIMP is all you need
>>57623038
Damn nigga, you take a misunderstanding and get all bent out of shape. Calm down, I'll pity fuck you all night. My pussy is wet right now.
>>57622431
Photoshop will never be dead because nothing will ever replace it.
>>57622431
is paint.net confirmed trash? been using it but honestly never quite as easy as photoshop or even adobe's flash suite many years ago.
>>57622431
>Who will use memetier cloudware when an alternative actually exists?
Who will not use it when you literally just have to replace the amtlib.dll to get it to work for free? Almost couldn't be easier
>>57623689
wut
>>57623933
What I'm saying is just crack it