>open source code """""review"""""

>>57574725
>Do you ever wonder how much malware and backdoors are hidden in linux distros?

Go through it and find them yourself then

I'll wait

>>57574725
What are you doing for dinner tonight?

>>57574725
>Do you ever wonder how much malware and backdoors are hidden in linux distros?
Yes. Why not post how many you found yourself?

>>57574725
Heartbleed is the best example of this.

It's gotten to the point that security-through-obscurity actually works now.

>>57574725
>t. Mactoddler

>>57574780
>>57574750
>Things you can't see don't exist
ok

Btw thanks for proving my poing, literally NOBODY will bother actually reviewing so much code without compensation. Linux is as safe as running some binary you downloaded from piratebay

>>57574846
retard t.b.h

>>57574846
>Things you can't see don't exist

You're an idiot for thinking thats what I was implying.

What I was implying that if you have any hesitation thinking there may be any backdoors or malware you can go look yourself and be sure

>literally NOBODY will bother actually reviewing so much code without compensation

You have a very rudimentary understanding of how linux works to think that you have to review every single line of code

>Linux is as safe as running some binary you downloaded from piratebay

Except that you can actually for your self read through the source and understand what it does

Just because you're lazy doesn't mean people aren't and just because someone takes their security into their own hands for whatever reason doesn't make them a 'fat neet'

File: obama-laughing-on-af1.jpg (129KB, 524x837px)

129KB, 524x837px

>>57574725
Everyone in Opensoresland thinks that other people are carefully reviewing the code, but everyone thinks that and no-one is actually reviewing the code! What a farce!

>>57574916
>Just because you're lazy doesn't mean people aren't
ok

>>57574966
>I poo on the street, therefore everyone does

too real man

>>57574846
>Linux is as safe as running some binary you downloaded from piratebay
citation needed

>>57575018
this comment made me really want to go poo in the street

File: indeks.jpg (4KB, 292x173px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 292x173px

Hows that better than the closed source development process

>management with no experience in software development comes up with an idea
>outsource the production to some sweatshop in india
>check if the update works on their windows xp testing machine
>it doesn't crash, push the update

File: 1347505049651.jpg (111KB, 477x517px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 477x517px

>>57574725
Closed-source code """"review"""" process:

>Some Pajeet gets assigned to develop a new feature
>writes code for it, gets it pretty much working
>manager asks for a status report
>"Well, it's working, but it hasn't been reviewed and the tests aren't written yet..."
>Manager: "fuck that shit, marketing is in a big hurry to get the next release out, ship it"
>Pajeet commits his code

>code is now considered safe and functional
>runs on millions upon millions of home computers and servers

Closed-source "security" is a joke.
Do you ever wonder how much malware and backdoors are hidden in proprietary applications and OSs?

>>57575148
The way you describe it makes it seems like it was made to "just work" which I am so inclined to agree with you

if anyone in here thinks that computers are in any way, shape or form even remotely perfect you are stupid, trusting open source software is stupid as trusting prop one. the only way to be sure is build atleast all the software/firmware yourself

>>57575270
Sure, you can build it yourself.
But how would you know that, in the source, there isn't a stealthily hidden backdoor?

>>57575304
>>>57575270 (You)
>Sure, you can build it yourself.
>But how would you know that, in the source, there isn't a stealthily hidden backdoor?
>>57575304
im sorry, let me clarify: CREATE IT YOURSELF if you are going turbo autism anyway

>>57575128

BLOWN
THE
FUCK
OUT

File: zEB0B4P - tifa.jpg (58KB, 600x847px)

58KB, 600x847px

I'm sure Intel, TI, IBM, and Google, all thought of this before buying big in to Linux the way a fish buys big in to water.

>>57575270
>>57575328
Don't forget that you must also write the compiler yourself to have any confidence in the security of your newly compliled source code.
www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/hh/thompson/trust.html