Why isn't 16:10 more common on laptops? Do any laptops other

File: 1478672252340.jpg (4MB, 7680x4800px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 7680x4800px

>>57551555
>not using 16:10

>>57551878
3:2 is superior

>>57551891
No.
1:1
16:10

>tfw still using my 1680x1050 screen with a scratch that ironically my old macbook made because 16:10 screens are rare and expensive

-8:20 is godmode.

>>57551891
>3:2
>aka 15:10
for once you're not losing height but I don't see reason to lose width

>>57551924
Losing width means the aspect ratio is better suited for things like photo editing since RAW files are 3:2 and reading documents

16:10 is better on desktops, 3:2 is better on laptops and tablets

21:9 masterrace

>>57551910
I have an LG flatron 1650*1050, pretty comfy

>>57551992
Nah

File: 8Yd8KLs.jpg (198KB, 2994x1078px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 2994x1078px

>>57552017
make this your wallpaper and take a picture

>>57552035
Okay

>>57552041
Nah. My gf's bf will make fun of me

>>57551878
Background?

>>57551979
>not being able to see the photo without scaling

>>57552080
lame