What is the most interesting engineering/technology related topic

phones

Spheric cubes

Nanotechnology

>>57544740
Automation of space probes for mining and processing ores to build more space probes and space ships in orbit

Virtual Reality

space bicycles

loli sex robots

>>57544740
Levers

>>57544740
inclined plane

neural nets

>>57544740
Machine learning

sexbots

>>57545935
>>57545987
This, faggots.

The meaning of life, as computed by a computer.

cold fusion

and bionic technology

if we can complete these, pretty sure we can build a mecha gundam

File: nasa-modular-robotic-vehicle-drifting.jpg (129KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 2048x1360px

>>57544740
Those wheels are HUEG. Not to mention said wheel would be prone to getting stuck in potholes and you.

You can get better performance by making every wheel on a car independently powered with independent 360 degree steering:
https://youtu.be/f-VUHdmjytM

>>57546575
Cold fusion isn't real and there are good reasons to believe it will never be real

>>57544740
>>>>>>>>>>>>>/Quora/

>>57547176
https://youtu.be/oSFYwDDVgac

>>57544740

Gravitational Engineering

>>57547176
Main difference between those and spherical tires (besides maglev) is spherical tires can make the car go diagonal without changing the car's angle making it a smoother ride. They're ideally designed for self-driving cars

VR and neural interfaces

File: 3733.png (523KB, 838x468px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 838x468px

>>57547672
The car in pic related can go diagonal without changing the car's angle. Heck it can trace out 'BENIS' in cursive without changing the car's angle, or trace out the same thing changing it's angle to absolutely whatever.

It's designed to be a self driving car.

>>57544995
pretty intelligent AI . probably give training in earth facility with raw materials before it is deployed

the wheel

Quantum Dildonics

>>57544740
a new type of technology that should replace the current counterparts.
HBM as an example.

sexbots

>>57548353
I meant like 1:45 of this video \/
>https://youtu.be/oSFYwDDVgac

>>57547176
people in the past believed earth is flat
people in the past believed more mass, more fast to fall
people in the past believed that no more smaller than cell
people in the past believed that we can't reach space
so cold fusion......

your point is?

>>57544740
Urban planning and housing policy

>>57554354
You do fall faster with more mass. Take two objects with the same surface area and volume but diffrent densities and the one with more mass will have a higher terminal velocity.

>>57554508
You're assuming gravity for that to be correct.

>>57554548
it is correct for any field force

show me where it aint correct

>>57554589
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E43-CfukEgs

>>57554608
WTF are you trying to prove? Yes, gravitational acceleration is the same on both objects. However, gravitational force of the objects are not the same. You mentioned 'assuming gravity' yet did not show a system without gravity. I will be pedantic assume the vacuum is imperfect, making the infinitesimal small amount of particles inside provide an equivalent resistive force, thus making the ball fall that amount sooner. However, since the surface areas and volumes of the two are diffrent, this is still not proving a point.