Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: nick-young-confused-face-300x256_nqlyaa[1].jpg (25KB, 600x512px) Image search:
[Google]
![nick-young-confused-face-300x256_nqlyaa[1].jpg](https://cdn.4archive.org/g/image/1479/259/1479259237816.jpg "nick-young-confused-face-300x256 nqlyaa[1]")
25KB, 600x512px
Anybody else ever notice bizarre omissions on Google?
I often search for porn Tumblrs by typing my
"desired keyword site:tumblr.com", which usually turns up some blogs and posts. But for some reason when I search "bimbo site:tumblr.com" there are zero results. Same for "bimbo tumblr". On Bing, however, these results are indexed. Why is this? Is this Tumblr or Google's fault?
>>
>>57532423
They've been doing this for a long time
Nothing new
>>
>>57532506
But why such a specific keyword?
>>
bimbo is sexist, shitlord
>>
>>57532585
I'm guessing this. You're not allowed to use the naughty words, OP.
>>
>>57532622
But slut, whore, and fucktoy all work fine.
>>
>>57532649
Those are "liberating" and "empowering" in the opinion of sex positive feminists. But I'm not aware of any feminists who think "bimbo" is.
>>
>>57532676
Shit, that's true.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1