can someone explain me the quote. what are life changing problems

>>57497682
system engineering advanced electric dildos.

They can solve the need for women in tech.

File: ganbatte.png (523KB, 756x703px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 756x703px

did grace hopper wear striped thigh high socks when she programmed?

File: FB_IMG_1477928208303.jpg (64KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 960x960px

They can't so shit , expect pose and look hot for us.

File: baka.jpg (205KB, 849x1200px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 849x1200px

>>57497770
you're really mean, I'm gonna become the best programmer just to spite you

>>57497682
looking cute while coding

>>57497783
Do it then, but doing something you won't enjoy to spite other people is not a good course of action

>>57497789
sorry, I mean looking cute while (coding)

>do look good while coding
Oh for fuckssakes
I'm going to go into work with a shirt that reads "Jacks dick while Javaing"

There is no applicable reason to wear that childish, attention grabbing cloth.

File: 1478325876363.jpg (88KB, 387x351px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 387x351px

I think the implication is that, since studies, and even just society in general, demonstrate that women have more inclination to caregiving and social roles, they'll program under those roles.

Because apparently women want people to believe they're more inclined to adhere to some roles even though that's the exact thinking they've been fighting for the past century? I don't understand what the fuck women want.

>>57497783
Trannnys don't count faggot.

>>57497795
building up a useful and commercially viable skill when you're a useless shut-in neet is a good course of action though.
>>57497813
vagina!

>>57497682
Period Apps
MEN BTFO

>>57497682
What's the point of those stickynotes? It's just a bunch of tech-y words

>malware, infection, vectors

Is it supposed to be the periodic table?

I'm overthinking this shit

>>57497795
>doing something you won't enjoy to spite other people is not a good course of action
This. Tricking a woman into doing something they hate for the sake of "equality" is fucked up. It's the same thing I think when someone complains about the "women make 77 cents per dollar a man makes" thing. Sure, that's technically true, but that's comparing all wages across all jobs, and women typically take jobs that pay less. Possibly due to factors such as their man paying the bills so all they have to do is work part time at a temp agency.

Everyone wants to "fix" it but they don't realize that the only possible solutions would be forcing men and women take jobs they don't want, or forcing employers nationwide to pay men less just because they're men and pay women more just because they're women.

>>57497848
>What's the point of those stickynotes? It's just a bunch of tech-y words
Welcome to project management.

I kind of wait till my next "boss" is introduced to me with the words.

File: programming 3.png (999KB, 800x1149px) Image search: [Google]

999KB, 800x1149px

>look cute while coding
Thought that was for guys

>>57497877
>that's technically true
No. It is not.

>>57497877
I'm not really actually doing it out of spite though, and certainly not because of equality. it's just banter

File: 1428955896971.jpg (26KB, 440x586px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 440x586px

>>57497916
all programmers should look cute

>>57497918
It's comparing raw wage data. It doesn't compare men and women from the same careers. It might as well be comparing engineer salaries to gradeschool teacher salaries, because that's effectively what it's doing.

>>57497965
And so it is not technically true.

>>57497985
What do you think technically means?

>>57497985
The truth is that "the average employed female makes 23 cents less per dollar than the average employed male". That's true.

If the statement was "the average female makes 23 cents less per dollar than the average male who works an identical job with identical hours" then it would be false.

>>57497805
> I don't understand what the fuck women want.

And neither do they, hence all the problems in the world.

Is there a look keyword?

Shouldn't it be lookCute(); as a function?

>>57497805
>what do women want
Women want equality with benefits. i.e.

>you should still pay for me
>but don't think that I need your money

>women can do everything that men can do
>but women are more compassionate and better at problem solving

>businesses should make sure that there are as many women as men
>but more women graduate college than men

The best thing to do is to pay lip service and move on.

>>57498244
You accidentally wrote women when you meant SJWs

>>57498032
And identical experience.

That kind of stuff is what makes computer fields the laughing stock of STEM. I don't see people in medicine saying "anaesthesiology needs more women because women give life and therefore care more about it". That shit would be ridiculous.

The big difference is that if someone tried to pull that shit in other fields, the rest of the women in the profession would join the men in thinking about how ridiculous it is. In tech it's immature boys vs girls bullshit, and in tech both sides eat it right up.

i'd love to see legitimate studies on how allowing women into the workplace has made society worse. it'll never happen, though.

>>57499076
>I'd like to see studies to confirm my conclusion.

>>57498232
It's a macro.

>>57497682
I like how her name perfectly captures the failed attempt to regain lost African culture/heritage.

What were her parents thinking? Probably "What language do they speak in Africa? I'll bet it has Q's in it".

>>57497704
>underrated

>>57497682
>Languages
>HTML >CSS
>Java >JavaScript
REEE

i think woman think coding is a synonym for web development

>>57497682
i revel in the fact that these stupid cunts will never get anywhere because they're actually fucking morons who were pushed through their education for diversity points

i must admit i feel somewhat bad for any woman who actually wants and can do this stuff, they really get dragged down by cunts with this kind of retarded attitude

>>57499056
It's a perfect storm.
1. Web/mobile dev is a high status, well-paying field...
2. ...with a pretty low barrier to entry...
3. ...that's dominated by men like tech generally is, but...
4. ...a lot of men in the field are socially unskilled nerds who are easy to guilt-trip.
EE lacks 2; CE and other engineering lacks 2 and often 1; Medicine and law lack 2, 3 and 4; and so on.

>>57497682
Is her lower body even real?

>>57497682
the missing space after do really bothers me

>>57499356
I don't know many EEs but most I've found seem fairly normal.

>>57497783
Gennady got u beat in infinity time, sry

How do I get gf?

>>57499076
Exactly how do you measure "made society worse"?

I dunno. Supposedly women are good at design? I don't agree in my experience but I guess it appeals to women more becuase they know womens tastes.

But I'm not sure they're really understanding what fields they're aiming for.

Regardless. Why is she posing in her panties?
To prove that she's not a pre-op transexual or something? Because i remember google's automatic list of programming women were like 25% MtF for the top 20 at least.
IIRC. It was a high amount anyway.

But to be fair the list became kinda crap after the big 3 (Lovelace, Hopper and whatshername that worked on ENIAC).

That's literally the only sane reason i can think of and it's weird as fuck.

>>57499519
>Why is she posing in her panties?
"I'm smart *and* sexy! [Suck it, rivals! Hey there~, romantic prospects.]"

>>57499820
Maybe it's a dual ad?
Ad for girltechie and panties?

>>57499966
Every ad with a celebrity or a celebrity-wannabe (in the age of social media that's a lot of people) is a dual ad.

>>57497682
>do{
FUCKING FUCK FUCK SHIT FUCK GRRRRRRRRR

>>57497682
can you really think, bill gates on microsoft's main page, standing up with his underwear and at the right it says something new about azure or windows 10 or some

File: 1473549155657.gif (3MB, 450x255px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 450x255px

Women are designed to look pretty and elicit and manage the breeding of new humans.
Men are designed to fix problems.

You can weep, scream and call foul... but you cannot change biological facts.

Neither sex is better. They're just different because they have different internal and external organs.

Onward to a superior machine future...

File: 1479050020233.jpg (110KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1024x768px

kek

File: womanaboutwomantechworkers.png (2MB, 923x2299px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 923x2299px

Don't bring your problems up at work but women need to be emotional for reasons unknown

>>57497736
she would wear a sailor uniform.

>>57497682
cd code
cd ..
ls
cd code
cd ..

>>57504202
>crazy_strings.rb

>>57497682
Why look cute isn't à fonction ?

Is ebonics a programming language?

>>57499519
I think it's some underwear company's lame attempt at jumping on the SJ bandwagon with 'empowering' ads judging by the 'brief, full lining' in the corner

Okay /g/ I'm gonna need your help on this one.
Why the fuck are women wearing such clothes ? Can you imagine a Man like this saying that he is smart and can solve tech problems ?
If i show up like this at work my boss will just send me at the nearest shop to buy decent clothes or talk to me about firing me

And it seems to aply to a lot of situations. Women can wear anything in any situation, people won't mind while a boy will have to wear a shirt with a tie etc.

>>57504298
She's declaring cute as a look, but then doesn't use it. Maybe she's relying on overrides of default constructors that use dirty heretical side-effects.

>>57504444
whitey.kill();

>>57504493
>Women can wear anything in any situation
yeah nah

as for your first question, moar attention

>>57504128
>"I get extremely angry when I come across articles that insist there are gender differences that extend beyond physiology"
>rest of the article lists such differences

wew

>>57497699
Nope, guys like OP are onto that.

>>57497802
>childish, attention grabbing cloth.
Says the fag with a trip......

>>57497770
They can type better than you.

>>57499076
Wouldn't it make it better? By allowing girls to do the easy jobs, it forces the males to aim for better jobs. Speeding up our advancement all's a civilisation.


But nah really you've probably never gotten to touch a vagina and are just an angry neet in his basement.

>>57504636
>it forces the males to aim for better jobs
It also dramatically decreases birth rates, contributing to civilization's decline.

>>57499356
EE is also dominated by older men, as they are the project leads with the experience. That's what I've learned through my interns.

So I guess it lacks 4 aswell, mainly because all the autistic shits are only just now trying to get in. Which is hard while the older guys still own the office. The may make it through university, but will crumble when they get into a professional office that doesn't have a full time barista serving coffee enemas.

File: bxeAwbN.png (63KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 625x626px

Did OP get his feelings hurt by a campus Tumblrina?

Keep crying, faggot.

#MGTOW
#MAGA
#Stormfront

>>57497682
>languages
>HTML

File: 1479054799625.jpg (61KB, 389x491px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 389x491px

>>57497682
>2016 and 11/12ths
>being caucasiophobic
>being patriophobic

File: Screenshot_20161114-021257.jpg (664KB, 1369x1635px) Image search: [Google]

664KB, 1369x1635px

>>57497802
I want that shirt

Women basically fill the void between the underachiever and the genius.

They are so average it hurts.

>programmers working in their underwear
No, I don't care if you are a girl, that's probably worse anyhow.

>>57499056
There are plenty of medical fields that have idiots call for more women. I've seen people claim that pediatrics needs more women because they're less likely to be pedos.

File: IMG20161002WA0000.jpg (78KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x640px

>>57497682
>photoshopped stomach

Reeee

File: finn_the_human_by_misfit101-d4j5169.png (160KB, 428x284px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 428x284px

>>57497682
>languages
>html
>css

File: colonmufufu.jpg (115KB, 509x501px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 509x501px

>>57505042
HTML+CSS is Turing complete though, anon.

>>57497736
No, because she was cis.

>>57497802
>Javaing
>>>/r/cringe

>>57499076
When it first happens, there's a spike in unemployment, since the available workforce effectively doubles. In the long term however, removing arbitrary restrictions such as gender helps achieve a better match between worker skills and job requirements (i.e. if 10% of men and 5% of women are good at making widgets, you get more good widget makers if women are allowed to work). And the labor glut eventually balances out too - with more labor, it is possible to increase overall productivity. And it also helps women become more self-sufficient, so that they don't need to rely on men, and it basically gives both sexes more freedom in living their life.

>>57499265
What's African about it? I'm pretty sure it has Latin roots.

>>57499415
>>57500006
It's perfectly valid. Whitespace is only needed to separate word-like identifiers - brackets and operators (which aren't valid characters in identifiers to begin with) don't need whitespace to separate them. For example, the following is perfectly valid C code:

int main(int argc,char*argv[]){printf("Hello, %s\n",argv[1]:argv[1]?:"anonymous");}

>>57504493
>Women can wear anything in any situation, people won't mind while a boy will have to wear a shirt with a tie etc.
It's actually the opposite, women tend to wear the female version of formal clothes as everyday wear, while men tend to wear their version only for special occasions.

>>57504511
It could also be a keyword similar to return.

>>57504667
Nah, women's employment is more of an effect rather than a cause of low birth rats. If society provided adequate demand/incentive for having kids, women would be doing that, rather than working.

>>57504889
HTML is a language, just not a programming language.

>>57505087
html is not

>>57505042
They're languages, just not programming languages. .ini files are a language too.

>>57505087
No

>>57505087
It isn't, but even if it was that wouldn't be a reason to use it.

Brainfuck is Turing complete, but that doesn't mean it's useful to program in.

>>57505230
>It isn't
It is.

>>57505283
It's really not

>>57497916
sauce?

>>57505283
Show me how to iterate over data using only HTML and CSS, short of preprocessing it through another tool or language since then you're just using HTML as a display device.

>>57505310
-"Women logic"

>>57504516

kek

File: 1388644334210.jpg (345KB, 599x846px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 599x846px

>>57497877
dont kid yourself. all these women they are preaching to will be going to get their womens studies, social justice arts degree because its much more enticing to be on the front lines and fight for what you think is right then to sit in front of a computer and be productive.

of course there are always those women who will code because it interests them, but theyre probably busy working and not giving a shit and being awesome and somewhat sexy

im confused. is this porn?

>>57505380
you're a fucking moron. HTML + CSS can be used to program a rule 110 automaton so it MUST be Turing complete. Jesus /g/ is retarded.

>>57497818
your butthole isn't a vagina. let alone your penis.

>>57497682
Literally anyone with a brain and the ability to reason can get into programming. This whole "WOMEN NEED TO GET INTO TECH BECAUSE VAGINAS" mentality needs to die.

>>57497704
God teir reply

>>57499155
Macros can have spaces?

>>57506008
Depends on the language

>>57498232
It could be a language where juxtaposition is function application

>>57506022
I mean I know a macro can insert spaces

#define NEW_INT int second_param

But I never heard of a preprocessor that allows spaces in macro names

#define NEW INT\ int second_param

But I don't get around that much, either.

>>57505042
Dat L in HTML doe

>>57506063
look is a macro, cute could be either another macro, or a regular identifier.

>>57505087
Javascript is Turing complete with only six non-alphanumeric characters.

>>57506647
Here's hello world
http://pastebin.com/8bgA397z

>>57505848
>I read the headline of a hackernews article and now I know that CSS is turing complete! I'll win so many internet arguments with people who say that CSS is a markup language!

>>57497682
womens invented solus

>>57499372
while (autism = true) {
photoshopBody = true;
}

File: 31254356432.png (298KB, 2271x2380px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 2271x2380px

>>57497682
Where can I find a girl like that?

>>57497783
pls b grill

>>57506942
>Warning: Assignment in a conditional.

>>57505143
That is not valid C.

>>57499056
Lol at ur baiting pubescent g posters with your implication.
But i like your theory, perhaps its just because in tech there are so little women that there isnt a critical mass of them outing the ridiculous claims, or not enough to match the mass of oportunists seeking an easy entry with quotas

>>57497682
I want her to crush my head between her legs like a watermelon

>>57497682
What kind of underwear is appropriate workplace attire?

>>57497916
>/g/ hates women and grills
>/g/ fantasizes about becoming a cute grill
>in other words become the very thing you hate

What the fuck is wrong with you people?

>>57508117
Anything, so long as you're a nappy-haired niggerjew female wearing sexist clothing in pseudo-code.

>>57497682
>can someone explain me the quote. what are life changing problems in tech only women can solve?

To be fair, it doesn't say that only women can solve them. In fact, it doesn't say women can solve them at all.

It only says that women WANT to solve DIFFERENT problems, the kind that are life-changing.

>>57505143
>printf("Hello, %s\n",argv[1]:argv[1]?:"anonymous")

WTF do you think that's doing there, boy wonder? Did you mean this, by any chance?

printf("Hello, %s\n", (argc > 1)? argv[1] : "anonymous");

Fucking amateur.

argv[0] is the command itself. argv[1] is the first proper argument, and argc.

>>57504202
fucking classic

>>57504014
>html
>Programming language

>>57506995
There are plenty at your local zoo anon

File: 1479050020233.jpg (10KB, 279x174px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 279x174px

>>57497682
show an intredasting point of view

Shameless shill: here's my vid about Feminism (SJWs) - Comp Sci relationship.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IkQdgBr-2M

>>57508162
What do you mean, "you people"?

Compsci is like the most well represented field in stem for women though

>>57497682
Why is she wearing no pants?
Imagine there was a guy on the picture not wearing pants
Feminists would go full retard

>>57509223
Sargon knock off. Bad one actually.
Get a better mic.

As a girl I think we should focus on promoting hot non-autistic(I don't mean quirky or dorky, programmers and other software engineers are clinically autistic) guys in the industry, they are the true minority.

>>57509243
you nigs know what i mean! xD

>>57509223
"Using historical figures as avatars will become the new fedora" - a well respected memeconomist

>>57509292
I didn't know who Sargon was when I was starting channel. Kraut and Tea and EdgySphinx were my "inspiration"
>>57509348
*tip*
It's already cringey I'm thinking of deleting it

>>57509432
You're not bad though, you have a reasonable pace. I guess clearer pronunciation that doesn't sound like you're about to melt would make it more enjoyable for me

I don't really get the whole idea behind it. I feel like most people just tread around a real answer. In the end I'm apparently to blame.

File: 1466491473957.webm (3MB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x480px

http://mashable.com/2016/05/16/mike-webb-porn-tabs/

Well... With great journalism like this... What do you expect?

It's virtue signaling on all fronts. Journalism is one such example of bullshit. This leads companies to fit in. Just a whole circlejerk of fucking retardation honestly. None of these companies care about any of this shit. They never did.

Google never gave a fuck about faggots. Now they're supporting mental illnesses by praising people in dresses and wigs. https://blog.google/topics/causes-community/transvoices/

Obama hated faggots, but then changed his view around 2012 because public opinion changed.

None of these cucks give a fuck about anything but themselves. They'll do anything to fit in and be liked. No one in the public eye has their own opinion anymore. Bunch of pussies. This is a major reason Trump won. A fucking """""""""""""news"""""""""""" article about porn tabs... A FUCKING NEWS ARTICLE ABOUT PORN TABS, /g/uys.

File: EveryDayWeStrayFromGodsLight.png (143KB, 458x446px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 458x446px

>>57505029
God damn that's fucking delicious.

>>57509652
Furthermore, they did some >>REAL<< investigating and even found what videos they were. Journalism.

That chick is very unattractive. Objectively unattractive.

>>57509652
>tfw you're not a hot girl
so painful

>>57510424
In a few years hot girls won't be hot either. So there's that.

>>57511065
yeah but I'll just be even uglier and no one will have ever loved me

Doesn't matter

Trump won and soon all these retards wont matter

The women in tech meme will go away, leaving only the competent women who are actually genuinely interested in the field

>>57511167
>implying looks are important for a man
Go earn some money senpai

The girls will come

>>57511285
>implying I'm a man

>>57497699
No, that was Ted Nelson's idea in 1975. He called it "teledildonics", great name imho

>>57504014
LOL too good

>>57497682
why is it so hard for women to wear clothes now days? I understand they are trying to leverage their sexual capital but sometimes it's just innapropriate. like the workplace or when its 5 below zero outside...

File: 5454.png (169KB, 355x218px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 355x218px

>wants women to be respected in tech

>>57511622
This is literally baby tier.
>ha ha I'm cute right?
>look me in undies and pretend to work like daddy ha ha
>big office lady yay!

>>57497682
>she will look cute exactly once

>>57504014
It only says "Languages", which they are.
HTML is a markup language and CSS is a style sheet language.

File: 1460597887651.jpg (497KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 1024x768px

part 2

>>57511762
congratulations to them, I very much support

>>57511762
Imagine the stench

>>57498251
It's a lot more women than just SJWs.

>>57511762
>coding in underwear
um

>>57511359
doesn't mean he perfected it for use with vaginas

>>57511762
Disgusting, I hope they have a good janitor that wipes the chairs, but I doubt it.

>>57497682
>unknown type "look"

>>57511707
I wish I had a programming daddy

>>57511914
I hope they have a female janitor, you know, because of diversity and shit
But I doubt it

>>57511762
I imagine their brains are starved with oxygen not only from the le difficult concept of """"coding"""" (I swear these bitches make me cringe whenever I hear someone say coding) but also from fatty over there hogging it all

File: above.jpg (37KB, 528x396px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 528x396px

>>57507823
>Lol at ur
stopped reading

>>57497704
the other two replies make it seem like it's a joke, but i genuinely think that's what the quote meant.

>>57497682
am I the only one that finds her face really hard to look at?

>>57504753
>MGTOW
good rules to live by but lots of idiots in the community.

>>57511762
Is this real? Holy fuck, women in tech were a mistake.

File: senzualni žabac.png (646KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 1920x1080px

>>57511889
>not coding in underwear

>>57511285
the girls that will come will not be girls that anyone wants, just shallow gold digging cunts

>>57511762
>''''''''''''''''''''feminism''''''''''''''''''''

>>57511285
You need both to truly slay puss.

But enjoy being an ugly beta with ''''money''''

>>57512677
so you mean all girls then

>doesn't want shallow cunts

what are you a faggot?

>>57512793
>doesn't want trust and stability
Enjoy your trainwreck of a life.

>>57512871
good luck with having that

>>57497736
In her time women were required to wear stockings by law, so partially yes.

>>57504128
That bitch gets back to cringe and sjw psycho bitch as soon as a man comments on that text.
Just read them up, she is totally retarded.

>>57512003
>am I the only one that finds her face really hard to look at?
Don't insult harambe.

File: bellpepper.jpg (117KB, 1025x935px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1025x935px

>>57513288
will that EVER get old?

>>57497682
>Languages
>HTML CSS JavaScript Java
More like women in webdev

Maybe instead of complaining about how there aren't enough women in tech, women should just try to get into tech.

>but it's hard!
yes, it is hard

File: article-2347887-1A7EB405000005DC-292_634x755.jpg (75KB, 634x755px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 634x755px

>>57512786
>you need both
Yea, i guess it's the good looks of Hugh Heffner that gets him the ladies. Clearly a 24 year old marrying an 84 year old isn't looking for fame and money

or Bernie Ecclestone
or any billionaire ever

lel

>>57512677
But that's the vast majority of women

>>57513448
:(

>>57511347
>implying 99% of all women can't get laid easily
you're doing it wrong

>>57513483
straw man, etc.

Let's not compare ourselves to demigods.

>>57513514
>implying the 1% isn't on 4chan

>>57513524
How is that a strawman?

I responded to a post claiming a man need looks as well as money to grab pussy. Obviously that's incorrect so i provided examples of old, unattractive men with loads of money who grabs lots of young pussy

>>57509476
Thanks mate, I will try in next vid coming this week. It'll be /pol/ material kek
But tech world is also goldmine considering GNU is becoming SJW movement as well

>>57497682
I think it should be

look(cute);

>>57509652
>Google never gave a fuck about faggots. Now they're supporting mental illnesses by praising people in dresses and wigs. https://blog.google/topics/causes-community/transvoices/
I actually love how "more women in tech" has become "more white men who have decided in their 30s to become women in tech"

Good thing to get behind to push your career forward, Google or Github turning you down? Just dye your hair pink and say you are a woman.

File: vagina software.png (56KB, 574x795px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 574x795px

>>57497682

See pic related.

File: 1311947803699.jpg (92KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 400x400px

>>57511857

>>57511857
Hey, 3 weeks out of 4 it would not be that bad.

>>57511762
>This is a bullshit free zone

Have you ever heard women only conversation? It doesn't revolve around much past gossip or grievance. Bunch of fucking children.

>>57504128
>I get extremely angry when I come across articles that insist there are gender differences that extend beyond physiology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiJVJ5QRRUE

>>57511762
this is too good

>>57497795
Telling the presumed 'her' to do it while also telling her not to do things in spite. You're a hypocrite.

>>57517318
Yup.

>>57518981
I liked this and watched it all the way through. Thanks for sharing.

File: lies.webm (738KB, 534x800px) Image search: [Google]

738KB, 534x800px

>>57505029
PROOFs?

File: stemwomen.jpg (64KB, 599x595px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 599x595px

>>57513448

It is a mathematical fallacy to suggest that all curves are lines.

That is to say, when you make the assertion that all trends MUST progress in a linear fashion you are mathematically incorrect.

>Women make up 51% of the American workforce, and yet only 20% of software engineers are female.

There is literally nothing wrong with this. You should not force 50% of women to become interested in computer science if they do not naturally want to do it. If they really want to do it, they will work their asses of to get good at it like anyone else who ever did anything worth doing.

>>57516691
are you seriously retarded?


what does cute contain? for all you know it could be a string that says "FUCK MY SHIT UP"

>>57511762
big ass whale bitch got the smallest pc
hahahaha
this is a satire, right?

>>57497682
The quote is saying "women also want to make the world a better place" not "some problems are only solvable by women"

>>57511762
the whale's farts probably have more impact on the world than a line of code ever could

>>57508162
Havent deen the light of [ObjC].
BOOL is homoerotic.

>>57511762
>fat girl is the only one without a Macbook
What do they mean by this?

>>57497682
if anyone was wondering grills do contribute some
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjva6ZJyhwE

>>57511762
The fat one left her shoes on so that she doesn't have to spend 10 minutes putting them back on in front of everybody.

>>57511762
>>57521785
it means she's probably the most intelligent of the lot

File: Milana Vayntrub -- ATT-4.jpg (433KB, 1100x944px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 1100x944px

Men are the ones who solve problems
Women are the ones who like to talk about them

/thread

>>57505159
>>57505186
>>57505230
>>57505291
>>57505380
>>57506799
Don't type if you have no idea about the topic.

>>57521945
I have worked with quite a few women and men now and from my experience women are those who do their work repeatedly without ever asking if what they do is right or not, men want to generally improve their efficiency, which is better in the long term.

>>57511762
MAN THE HARPOONS, LADS

>>57497937
>pedophile detected

hope you die in prison

>>57499488
zipties

>>57504444
no patrick

>>57507031
>>57506942
Plot twist: it ensures autism to be true forever, by design

>>57506008
>>57506063
>I never heard of a preprocessor that allows spaces in macro names

(define-symbol-macro |hello world|
  '(progn
     (print "Hello, world!")
     nil))

Triggering the neckbeardy element of /g/ with faux aspirational quotes and the merest mention of this topic, apparently?

>>57508162
Women and feminine are mutually exclusive in modern western culture.

Fantasizing about being cute and being feminine goes well together.

There is nothing wrong with it.

They can let you sexually relieve yourself in the office. It is life changing because it might result in a child.

>>57513210
Relax man, she is just a woman.

>>57523321
I can confirm this observation with my experience as well.

The women I worked with didn't even want efficiency improvements because they were afraid they would have nothing to do and lose their jobs.

Of course, even after I basically replaced a few of them with software, they still kept their jobs because they were really good at crying.

File: comeonnow.gif (3MB, 320x214px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x214px

>>57497770
Bitches can't do shit other than suck dick

>>57511065
>>57511167
In a few years you will have 10/10 robots and no high maintenance hassle. Win.

>>57497682
There are none the best reason that i can think of to have women in tech is that they offer a different perspective. But everyone offers a different perspective so yeah, not much of a gendered issue by my reckoning. Of course the only people that say things like that are the people who don't think women can make it in a free market, which is pretty sexist.

>>57523378
I'm actually only attracted to masculine older men.
nice try tho

>>57525638
>tfw no robot husbando

>>57526102
What? We cannot risk our robot waifus running off with your robot husbandos.

I guess how to look cute while coding...

>>57521495
>retarded
No, regardless of what 'cute' contains, the general syntax should be method(action);

File: Screen Shot 2016-11-15 at 12.23.50 PM.png (427KB, 961x342px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 961x342px

She's so good at coding, she built her website with Strikingly

why cant /g/ fathom a competent young female programmer who isnt just into webdev?

>>57518067

Underrated post.

>>57504128
Wasn't there another article like that, which explains how all the hired females sing and dance around the male workers and flirt with them all day long and worry about makeup and shit, instead of actually working?

I remember reading it one or two years ago.

I tried to google for it, but google penalizes such results and I can't find anything.

>>57505029
and legs and face

File: femilogic.png (38KB, 497x393px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 497x393px

>>57523378
>drawing a cartoon
>pedophile
wut

File: 50ShadesofGreyCoverArt.jpg (47KB, 275x414px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 275x414px

We shall now dedicate this thread to the discussion of great female authors who empower females all around the world in the fight against sexism and objectification.

Female authors who especially elevate all the poor white women who were treated as slaves without any rights for centuries, who were persecuted and killed without mercy, and who had all their wealth stolen from them by evil white males, and who had their clits circumcised by evil white males.

Let us discuss the first masterpiece, the most empowering and popular among women: 50 Shades of Grey.

What does /g/ think about this glorious feminist work of art?

>>57528973
>oh great, another transphobic bigot who knows nothing else except throwing insults

>>57497682
I'd fuck dat hoe

>>57511762
>who ate wally?

>>57497682
please stop reposting this, you cancerous motherfucker

>>57529167
forgot to sage

>life changing problems
But my life is in no way influenced by this woman.
She has no connection to my life.
I don't think she will ever be anything in my life.
I don't even want her to have anything to do with my life, i frankly find her repulsive and would prefer an Asian or Latina waifu rather than a turdwaifu.

File: IMG_4392.jpg (342KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 683x1024px

>>57497682
I want to have babies with her. My poor white dick can't handle it.

>>57527124
guess you'll just have to scrap the robot waifus then.

>>57497877
Not sure if you have actually sat down with any real wage gap studies but they do control for experience, field, education, etc.

File: women in tech.png (522KB, 805x591px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 805x591px

Women in tech have been either extremely incompetent or scam artists.

In the past, extremely incompetent would be Carly Fiorina letting Steve Jobs run laps around her.
Today, extremely incompetent would be Marissa Meyer being too weak to oppose Obama's overreaching government and "the man" using her to unconstitutionally spy on American citizens.

>>57529534
>extremely incompetent would be Carly Fiorina
You might want to look up what her degrees are in. You will probably not believe me if I wrote it here.

>Marissa Meyer
Was she incompetent or did she just board a sinking ship with no hope?

Oh and talking about competence and looks, you might want to look up Ceren Ercen. No pics, this is a blue board so look it up yourself.

>>57497682

Yeah, if one of these spills shit in the breakroom another one can mop it up.

>>57504014

Absolutely
SUBVERSIVE

>>57504128

This is what happens when a woman gets into the position of realizing, and being financially effected by, the uselessness of women workers.

>>57511762

>1 skinny nerd in the next room in the dark doing all the actual work

File: 1469815683364.jpg (439KB, 1050x1080px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 1050x1080px

>>57530354

>>57530420
It disgusts me that people may confuse me for this demographic because I also use glasses and have a beard.

>>57530442
Same, but I'm going to change the style of my glasses
Also my beard looks good

>>57530490
Same here, I made the mistake of listening to my dad when picking my glasses. I've been meaning to get a new one ever since. I prefer smaller ones that sit close to my eyes, not these huge ones which cover my entire eye socket.

Forced integration in industries actually does immediately solve inequality issues for example removing segregation. Its really whether or not forcing people to do things for "the greater good" is ethical because of obviously freedom concerns

Are trans and traps relatively over-represented in Compsci?
like, obviously there are more men and even women coders, but they are hundreds of times more common.

>>57523458
Now try without the |.

>>57508162
2D != 3D

>>57511762
>wordpress

>>57509223
Good video. Don't listen to haters with no videos

>>57528986
> art
It sucked

>>57499265
Quiessence is latin (ish) you egrol

File: 1467348978082.jpg (34KB, 639x631px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 639x631px

>>57497682
>Social Engineering
Being a Woman 101

>>57497682
>Remove Code Execution

That about sums it up.
/thread

>>57507235
Yeah I accidentally posted an earlier version, here's the one that actually works:

#include<stdio.h>
int main(int argc,char*argv[]){printf("Hello, %s\n",argv[1]?argv[1]:"anonymous");}

>>57508258
No, I wasn't intending to use argc or argv, on my machine non-existent command line arguments are apparently null pointers, so the conditional returns "anonymous" if no name is provided. Though looking back on it I'm pretty sure this is implementation-defined; if the standard guaranteed that all non-existent command line arguments were null pointers, then (a) there would be no real need for argc (though it allows args to be counted in o(1) rather than o(n)), and there would need to be a fixed upper limit to allowable arguments (otherwise you'd have to have an infinite array of null pointers).

>>57511939
>can't into typedefs

>>57513422
>language for arranging text and images on web pages
>language for defining formatting styles for use on webpages
>language for writing software that runs inside the browser
>language for writing object oriented cross-platform apps
>/g/ doesn't think any of the above are languages

>>57518067
>Such software is unneccessary since all a girl has to do is keep her legs closed
Sorry, that's utterly retarded. Sure, it is something that's almost guaranteed to prevent pregnancy, but expecting people to just not have sex shows a severe disconnect with the real world. It's equivalent to saying "don't drive" as a proposed way of preventing automobile accidents.

>>57523710
>Women and feminine are mutually exclusive in modern western culture.
So you're saying modern western women are masculine? Are you utterly retarded?

>>57535442
>>Women and feminine are mutually exclusive in modern western culture.
>So you're saying modern western women are masculine? Are you utterly retarded?

Strawman + misinterpretation = gfto /g/

File: hj.png (623KB, 837x860px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 837x860px

>>57497682
What a fucking disgusting pair of panties.

>>57504183
Underrated post.

File: 863-623.jpg (58KB, 480x384px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 480x384px

>>57511762

>>57513210
The guy made some spergy comment about how exceptions must be made for women in the workplace because they differ from men biologically, and the chick who wrote that post called him out on his bullshit.

>>57530518
>>57530490
>get trendy glasses
>not bad but not great either
>a new pair would cost 200€ minimum

I'm stuck with these for at least another year

>>57497682
Ugh. Please tell me this isn't real. I feel fucking betrayed every time something like this happens. They know this isn't why we want to be in tech. They know this is meaningless word salad. They know we want to be in tech because we like it and just want more acceptance once we're in the work place. You can provide girls some focused training and concentrate on acceptance in tech jobs without selling out every woman.

What is this message even? It doesn't inspire women. It pisses off men. It makes the divide larger.

>>57497682
racist and sexist much?

>>57499076
Productivity doubled but wages got lower

>>57536875
>called him out on his bullshit.
Men and women are neurobiologically different, especially due to sexual selection promoting greater variety in men

>>57509652
>because public opinion changed
But it didnt, MSM just made it seem fringe to the point where even Fox is pro gay

>>57535442
>driving is necessary in modern society
>no one is forcing you to be a total roastie and theres tons of contraceptives available

File: 1475275150882.png (71KB, 592x492px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 592x492px

>>57521730

Yep. This looks pretty much like our scrum board when it was held by a woman.

>>57497682
Automated sandwich makers.

File: Ramsay.gif (2MB, 245x180px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x180px

>>57511762
WTF mang?

>"womenz, in MUH techs?!"
>garbage outside of /b/
>posted 3 days ago
>+280 shitposts
>mods still haven't deleted this

Step up your game, Hiro administration.

>>57497682
>what are life changing problems in tech only women can solve?
Life ruining problems women create for others.

>>57511762
>This is a bullshit free zone
I'm guessing that put that behind the heifer as a precautionary measure.

>>57523424

It could be parallel and autism a shared variable so the value would be changed by another thread

while(autism)

>>57511762
>this is unreal
This is meta.
The picture is pure satire, critique of itselft.

>>57540663
Go back to /r/eddit, nu male.

>>57526076
Supreme taste

>>57497682
>wearing revealing clothes
>wearing make up
>photoshopped to hell and back
>"feminist"

come the fuck on.

also why write "malware" and "install" and "languages" on post-its and stick them to the wall what the fuck does that achieve?