Tech illiterate here.
Why screens of low end-middle rangelaptop are still shitty ? Cant see shit in the sun, low rez (1368*768).
My godamn 150$ Android shitphone has an OLED full hd.
It's possible to have a full HD used laptop with a led display under 400$ ?
>why are cheap laptops made of cheap components???
>>57469585
You get what you pay for dumbass
>>57469609
Just want a used laptop with a led screen full HD >400$ faggot, i'm not asking for a 5K retina display for christ sake.
Any references fellow /gentoomens/ ?
>>57469635
Thinkpad T520 has an optional 1080p panel. It's a TN though.
>>57469585
buy a chromebook and install linux on it
>>57469585
High resell margins. You can get retina lcd panesl for 100$ from bulk supplier, imagine how much does he get them for.
>>57469635
>humble water filter salesman btfo's armenian genocide denier t*rkroach
>>57469765
Thanks. I like olds thinkpad...apart from the screen.
No TN.
larger screens would require better gpus / cpus and create too much lag overshooting the acceptable engineering requirements of the dorerty threshold, as well as acceptable energy requirements
as well as debasing current mind-share in UI presuppositions, you fuckin scrub
http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/should-you-buy-oled-laptop/
>>57469931
Interesting. So Oled or IPS ?
Looking for the "retina feel" of MBP.
>>57469928
Current day mobile graphics surpassed the limits of 10-12-year old top class gpus, which were already capable of driving 1600p displays in multiple setup back in the day. Laptops are mostly used to display text and images, thus giving their screens more pixel density would enhance the experience and lower the eyestrain.
>>57469998
that's some nice wikipedia wisdom
>>57470164
>No argument, just insults
>Previous post is just a collection of buzzwords like "mind share" and "threshold"
>Namefag
4/10 troll, you got the other anon to bite.