How does WD My Cloud not violate any terms of service? The

>>57442098
*were not responsible for how people use our service blahblahblah some countries blahblahblah contact your isp for more details blahblahblah

dont worry your pretty little head about it bub

>>57442098
>How does WD avoid the legal issues?
What legal issues? There's no legal repercussion for violating a TOS and it's not WD's job to abide by the TOS with your ISP because you signed it, now them.

Most ISPs don't pull petty bullshit like yours OP.

File: Screen Shot 2016-11-08 at 1.26.50 PM.png (674KB, 2320x1160px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 2320x1160px

>>57442209
I agree, it just seems that if you had a bad relation with your ISP, they will be more than likely to use this against you. Wonder how this home cloud is taken in other countries too. If it's considered hosting a website, and if an ISP has an automated notification system for small things like this.

Im sure If you were a video editor using terabytes a week running off a unit like in the picture, that your ISP might give you a call and see whats going on...

>>57442098
I love mycloud, I don't think I can ever go back to living without a NAS connecting all my devices.

>>57442098
That would also mean Plex is easily violating

They don't care as long as you aren't using something huge like TB a month

>>57442329
Non shit ISPs don't care about how much traffic you use per month.