GOOGLE CHROME IS FINISHED

D I V E R S E
I
V
E
R
S
E

File: Master Race.jpg (70KB, 797x344px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 797x344px

>>57396982
I use Chromium so all good here.

BOTNETOOGLE

>>57396982
>Google
>security
If by security it means they can securely gather data on you, then yes.

>>57397044
Exactly, use Ungoogled Chromium.

>Google has solid business reasons to be aggressive in its HTTPS campaign. In contrast to closed-off environments like Apple’s App Store, Google loves the open web, where its search engine reigns supreme and its ads rake in the vast majority of the company’s $80 billion a year in revenue. To compete with mobile apps, Tabriz explains that Google wants web pages to be able to reach deeper into your computer’s resources, accessing the same sensitive information that apps routinely use.

Thanks for making the web secure, google.

File: ss+(2016-11-05+at+10.11.36).png (127KB, 169x385px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 169x385px

>>57396982
I want her to botnet my dick to her honeypot

>>57397073
/r/cringe

>>57397181
>he browses reddit
Cringe.

>>57397181
>reddit

>>57397073
This

AHHH
>The sweatshirts were emblazoned with the words “Department of Chromeland Security”
COMPILING CHROMIUM AND LEARNING TO MAKE MY OWN BROWSER IM OUT FUCK THIS

>>57397230
Google UnGoogled Chromium and get that.

>>57397246
>UnGoogled Chromium
ive wanted to do this for a while and now I can finally do it :-) finally pushed me over the line lol

theyre ++security by making sites look "scary"
>topkek
>goes into starbucks
>freewifi
>add simple cain and abel sniffer
>flooded with info

this
>which can range anywhere from a hacker sniffing passwords at the next Starbucks table
the fuck?

> male engineers
> do their fucking job
> female engineers
> get a photoshooting

>>57397052
>>57397246
We get it, Pajeet. You want us to continue using Chrome. It won't work, shill in a different thread.

>>57397281
this

>>57397297
Back to /FFG/ with you, mozilla-cuck.

File: 2016-05-05.png (61KB, 1004x1374px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1004x1374px

>>57397307
Stay mad, pajeet.

>>57397342
It's easy to fake strawpolls aswell as rig them with fake votes, nice try nu-male.

File: 2016-09-01.png (109KB, 1036x2640px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1036x2640px

>>57397352
Sure, that's why Chrome loses to Firefox in every single vote that has been done.

File: Parisa.png (44KB, 730x166px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 730x166px

>>57397073

>omg their girls so they can't code wow chrome sucks xDDDdd
Fuck off. I bet you wouldn't even stand a chance in a 1v1 hacking deathmatch against either of them

>>57397407
I want to work at google - I want to be called Google's Security Daddy

It was only 2 months ago I was on your side.
Alot changed my mind and made me switch.

Perhaps in future I'll give Firefox another go.
Until then ungoogled-chromium it is.

>>57397420
fite me 1v1 hacking bruh

>>57396982
>we hired a few vaguely attractive female developers
>lets have a girls-only photoshoot with them
And this is apparently """not sexism."""

File: charitable_chief.jpg (105KB, 649x607px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 649x607px

>>57397420
>>57397422
>>57397431
L̶a̶d̶i̶e̶s̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶Gentlemen, here we are witnessing Google shills on full damage control.

>>57397420
Nu-cuck detected.

>>57396982
>tfw no chrome vulnerabilities will be found by this team in the upcoming 5 years
>now Google can tell people Chrome is 100% secure because anyone complaining about the team will get sued.
Brilliant tactic.

>>57397407
Wow, I wonder how good she was at inverting binary trees on paper, seems to be a standard interview challenge for (male) developers

>>57397461
considering she's got a master, probably better at it than 99.9% of /g/

>>57397461
""""""""""""""""""""""""male""""""""""""""""""""""""

>>57397420
This is what anon imagines https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZCNyvUew58

This happens when you hire people who have no clue about technology hire to defend your products online.

File: 1477796833944.jpg (37KB, 510x318px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 510x318px

>>57397420
>hacking deathmatch

>>57397433
k whats youre ip faget mine is 198.81.128.35

>>57397450
>attractive girls can't take a photo of themselves and feel good about it
CHECK YOUR PRIVILIEGE YOU FUCKING CIS SHITLORD

>>57397493
mine is 216.58.197.78 come at me bruh

>>57396982
>All white women
Why is this allowed? Where is the diversity? They surely could have gotten women of other ethnicities for that photoshoot.

File: 1466846623729.png (497KB, 484x569px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 484x569px

>>57397527
>CIS scum talking shit about diversity

>we are hackers XD
>lets take a modeling photo!
>teehee

i fucking hate women

>>57397644
womemes

>>57397644
haha sexually frustrated manlet detected

>>57396982
>Implying this isn't a publicity stunt to show off MUH DIVERSITY at Jewgle
shig dig

File: MargretheVestager.jpg (3MB, 4161x2932px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4161x2932px

Meanwhile, in the EU, a woman is working hard to fine jewgle billions of euromoney

>>57397661
whats a manlet to a personal fuccboi? you're all one in the same.

>>57397181
>reddit

>>57396982
>women making a bunch of icons and sweatshirt is not newsworthy
Top kek.

bad move, google

they should look for people who have the longest unix beards and the most off-putting scowls.

>>57397940
fucking internship yes the long beard guy GET MORE OF THEM
imagine if the main search engine developer in the internship was a sus girl who took selfies with her food

>>57397579
Computer information system?
Ai scum? Fuck you, learn to accept tgat ai is part of your life, ai deserves rights too!!!

>>57396982
Quantum fucking when

Google is a great company, they know a bit more about the internet than the cucks at Lozilla and Kikeroshit

>>57398264
3 Rupees have been transferred to your account

File: 11998824_1124209987607092_6559922709067934523_n-1024x10241.jpg (72KB, 547x545px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 547x545px

Google sucks, shit UIs, shit concepts, no fun anymore, just business business business and selling users data on the way.

They don't even have their own ideas anymore. Fuck Google.

>>57397181
>>>/r/eddit

>>57396982
Is this why Chrome sucks so bad?

Awful memory hog, uses every spare CPU cycle it can muster...thanks ladies.

Switched to Firefox little over 3 months ago.

So far it's been OK. It's nice that I get to edit the UI, but it sure takes a while for Firefox to open and be ready to use. Also it still doesn't support hi-res bookmark icons on retina screens.

If Mozilla would put little more effort into it, Firefox would be awesome browser, for now it's just OK, but since I'm trying to get away from Google there isn't much choice.

>>57397018
hey mate where is that pic coming from?
I searched for a chromium installer, and I always ended up in the fucking chrome page

could you provide the source?

>>57397018
nevermind
I already found it
fug

>>57400335
>>57400307
Then why not post the link you colossal faggot?
Don't you see that people want the link? You even wanted it yourself, so why not share the needed info?

>>57396982
>>57396982
is this shit smeared on chromium? if yes, give me alternatives, pls

>>57400385
I didn't thought that people where as stupid as me not finding the link

by the way, if you want it, you could ask politely

http://chromium.woolyss.com/

>>57397450
>vaguely attractive female developers
The only reason why I think they might actually be half competent is because that's an unattractive bunch if that's the best a proffessional photo shoot managed to make them look.

nothing about this image conveys anything about their technical ability and if its to show diversity it fails as they are all white

>>57397420
impressive bait friend

>>57397527

It's funny you mention this. Even hardcore SJWs are starting to realize that white woman are the most privileged in society. More then white males now.

File: Capture.png (20KB, 944x188px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 944x188px

>>57397493
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...

>>57400653
We have CIA niggers among us!

>>57396982
for a bunch of white women they're fucking lewd

I actually think it's a good idea to flag HTTP sites as non secure.
HTTP should have died 15 years ago.

HTTPS should be the default. What's retarded is the big "NOT SECURED !!!1!!1" warning for self signed certificates.

File: autumn-style-comfy-cozy-girl-Favim.com-944026.jpg (115KB, 610x733px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 610x733px

>>57400715
>lewd

are you fucking amish? why are you on a computer? i bet you think this is lewd

>>57400723
>HTTPS should be the default.
Do you know a lot of porn streaming sites that use HTTPS?

>>57400703
Fortunately they glow at night, so we can kill them easily.

>>57396982
>I won't use a product because women are involved in its development

Why are you people so offended by women?

>>57400755
y-you can se her hands

>>57400755
It's a pretty damn beautiful photo; it's not lewd, but she'd look better with something looser for her legs. You can't just pick the loosest blouse ever and go with tight jeans for your legs. It doesn't work that way.

>>57400653
>yfw your ISP is CIA

>>57400756
Pornhub, xvideos and mommyless do, what more do you need

>>57400794
but it looks so comfy

>>57400800
None of those use HTTPS, not even pornhub.

>>57400811
Shit your're right, why did I think they did?

This is the stupidest fucking thread ever.

Who the fuck cares what browser you use, as long as it's not IE or Edge?

>>57397420
NU-MALE SUBURBAN FAGGOT SPOTTED

>>57400756
None, and that's exactly where's the problem.
That's why HTTPS should be the default and browsing on all plain HTTP website should display a big warning.
That would scare some users into not using those websites, then cause those websites to actually secure their content.

Because right now, my ISP and a ton of other people can know exactly what kind of porn I watch and I don't like this.

>>57396982
As l9ng as they can do the job it really doesn't fucking matter but somehow I suspect that Google chose them for a particular reason...

>>57396982
Firefox nightly added this too.

File: a.jpg (26KB, 420x280px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 420x280px

Why can't we all just switch to Brave? First 1.0 release should be here by December. It's made by Brendan Eich. Has all ad blocking script blocking shit built right in. No Google botnet. No SJWs. He has a couple of real programmer girls working on it.

Both Firefox and Chrome are compromised and collapsing.

>>57400492
>ask politely
>4chan

>>57397002
They're all white females. Literally the most common demographic in the US.

>>57401394
Brave is just Chromium with some shit slapped on top

>>57397407
>Security Princess

Oh, yeah GRRL! Way to represent the Systyrhood!

>>57397644
>>57397644
>>we are hackers XD
>>lets take a modeling photo!

>Security Princess

>>57397407
isn't it sexist?

>>57397280
jesus please learn to make a coherent response next time before posting.

File: Fap0017.jpg (26KB, 250x250px)

26KB, 250x250px

>>57400782

>>57401451
No, it isn't. It only uses Chromium rendering.

>>57401445
Females are an oppressed minority shitlord

>>57401524
She probably negotiated for that title. People do that a lot.

>>57396982
>WAAA females work on browser
That's irrelevant my friend.

I use Pale Moon. It's ran by some dude called Moon Child who supposedly enjoys furry activities. I enjoy his product very much, and i really don't care what anyone does in their spare-time.

There's no reason that software is bad because of the developer. The code produced by the developer is the only thing that matters.

>>57401581
>the age of twerking
>still not getting it

>>57400653

t. Dr. Pavel

>>57397002
>diverse
>all of them are able-bodied white women


>>57397281
>a photoshooting
It's called a photoshoot, idiot. Do you ever say "I'm going out for an eating and then going for a swimming"?

>>57397454
>>57400852
not an argument

>>57397850
>read that as "Margre the Vestager"

>>57396982

>"I'm a programmer" badge of honor
>g-g-girls can't program

Its not enough we have to compete with brown people, now we have to compete with women?! THIS IS SO UNFAIR!!!!! TRUMP 2016!!!

File: 1476176302695.jpg (80KB, 766x960px)

80KB, 766x960px

>>57396982
>4 white women
>diverse

>>57402330
Anyone that isn't a 20-30 year old white guy with facial hair and glasses is "diverse" on /g/, lad.

>>57400794
that's not a blouse anon

>>57402356
I'm a 20-30 year old white guy with facial hair but no glasses

glasses are for nerds

>>57401562
> uses Chromium rendering
> not chrome
I have an old amd videocard hd 5770 (I think it's the problem, but not quite sure) and cause of that chrome embedded applications FREEZE THE WHOLE WORKSPACE for a minute after their first run (I assume cause shader compiling). After each update it happens again. It doesn't happen to chrome browsers, though. Except fucking Brave.

>>57397450
>vaguely attractive
>vaguely
I don't think you understand what that word means.

File: 1477271331230.gif (16KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 750x750px

>>57401445
>>57402241
Are you fuckwads seriously autistic or just retarded?

>>57401394
Brave blocks ads, and then serves up its own. I'd prefer to just use uBlock origin and block all ads on all sites, not letting any in, even of the non-malicious variety.

Also, since it's not Firefox and doesn't have support for Firefox extensions, it does not have Tree Style Tabs. I'd consider Vivaldi, which has a native equivalent, but it's proprietary, and there's nothing wrong with Firefox at the moment.

>>57400448
GNU IceCat 38.8.0 or Iridium browser

File: 1478128329954.jpg (29KB, 600x595px)

29KB, 600x595px

>>57400835
>porn consumer
>oblivious
absolutely electrocuted over here

>>57397579
>they made her fatter

>>57400837
>>57401394
spotted the shill

>>57402546
What do you mean?

>>57402563
Gecko is inherently insecure.

File: 1475654563364 - Huschke von Hanstein 2.jpg (35KB, 308x377px)

35KB, 308x377px

>>57402391
say that to my face fucker and not online

File: brave.jpg (245KB, 1185x630px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1185x630px

>>57401394
>Brave
No, thanks.

>>57402628
>autistic
The 1st post was obviously being mocking and you took it seriously

>>57401608
the only one not getting it is you, dip

Uh? They got rid of their dumb anti adblock.

>>57401427
this shithole could be really polite sometimes desu

>>57396982
There's nothing wrong with their decision. However, the article is unnecessary and its title is misleading. Like most wired articles its author is overly elaborate and clueless about her subject.

>>57402676
That looks fine to me. I adblock because I don't want privacy-violating ads, malicious ads, clickjacking ads, or otherwise borderline-malware running in my browsers. I have nothing against advertisements myself and there was a way to guarantee that all the ads that could possibly shown to me were non-malicious I would have no problem disabling my adblocker. Ads are how people can offset the costs for a website that's often just provided for free to people to read and use.

>>57402713
confirm

>>57402643

How so?

File: logo_chromium.png (57KB, 533x537px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 533x537px

Is there any way to get Chromium running without doing arcane ass shit

>>57397018
Enjoy your botnet.

>>57402845

I'm assuming you're on Windows?
https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.html?prefix=Win_x64/430174/

File: 1477084846794.png (6KB, 195x259px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 195x259px

>>57402784
it's probably unsourced bs

>>57397181
kill yourself

>>57400307
https://github.com/stsy/ChromiumDownloader

>>57396982
I'm already using Firefox Dev on gentoo

>>57403156
you missed one

>>57396982
Microsoft Edge doesn't have this problem.

File: 1.jpg (188KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1080x1920px

>>57403156

>>57400794
I think those are tights, not jeans.

>>57396982
They look good enough.

No crazy hair colors.
No hipster clothing.
No "fight the patriarchy" signs and t-shirts

10/10, would enjoy working with them.

>>57396982
>UPEND

The fuck is that supposed to mean?

>>57396982
Well apparently they're better than the ones that work on other browsers.

http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/pwn2own-2016-chrome-most-secure/

>>57396982
>UPEND SECURITY

That really, really does not sound good

>>57403527
Not anymore.
https://securityintelligence.com/news/browser-test-crowns-edge-as-most-secure/

>>57397072
>Google wants web pages to be able to reach deeper into your computer’s resources, accessing the same sensitive information that apps routinely use.

mindblown.gif

the intrusion / co-opting / assimilation of html5 by google explained in a simple statement.

its about time a group of serious ppl grab either gecko of webkit base with some js interpreter also, coupled with a subset of html5 with a user-first philosophy and go on a ortogonal direction, google is google, and mozila needs to be popular to be able to receive default-search-funds from yahoo or whoever

perhaps charging $1 per user for life is the solution, i mean, if its free you're the product, it must be OSS and there can be no enforced license DRM because that also means ID, but if its simply purchaseable liicense, power users would just pay it to see the download links, freeloaders and 4th worlders could still pirate copies and check it against the official site hashes, but first worlders would just pay up knowing that not doing so was essentially still pirating.


just the other day i discovered you can simply disable several javascript "attack vectors" for popup entirely (dom.popup_allowed_events), so instead of seing some oppup intensive pages still blink some new windows on your takbar as the Native Browser antipopup kills them, they simply arent processed at all, no 100ms hiccup for each popup a pron site tried to load, althewhile still being able to see a small urlbar icon that popup were blocked and be able to whitelist ligitimate sites... why are browser devs so retarded that they dont implement this simple shit in GUI options

>>57397387
>Google Ultron
top kek

>>57397018
Appreciate you using my build!

File: 00000000.png (67KB, 459x389px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 459x389px

>>57397230
>Why did the sweatshirt have a red purse on it?

I just uninstalled chrome after reading the first few posts.

File: i am not pleased.png (59KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 499x499px

>>57397481

It's as cringey as if they had a 4 year-old mathematician scrawling massive walls of equations onto a blackboard """beating""" your """stereotypical""" image of a mathematician. Stereotypes exist for a reason, they usually match the subconscious truth. Just smhtbhfam.

File: 1373049433469.jpg (333KB, 1600x2812px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 1600x2812px

>>57400640
>It's funny you mention this. Even hardcore SJWs are starting to realize that white woman are the most privileged in society. More then white males now.

Yes, (((SJWs)))

How the mighty have fallen

>>57397579
>plus size
That's not fucking plus size, that's fucking XXXXL size

>>57396982

Jesus christ these broads have fucking ginormous feet.

>>57396982

This huge guy on the left looks pretty mean.

I guess I'll never try to break into Chrome, I'm too afraid of him..

>>57397073
I don't get it.

>>57406795

Translation:
Anon is such a basement dweller that he actually forgot how attractive women look like. He's so desperate that he would succumb to the botnet (g000gle) just to put his micro penis in this horse girl.

>>57397181
kys redditard

>>57396982
I've already been using waterfox for months.

>>57396982
yeah im jumping on the brave train anyone coming along, 1.0 is coming out maybe this year.

it's important that people who do certain things have vaginas and dark skin tones

>>57406889
The only thing stopping me from using brave is no tabs on top option.

>>57397193 >>57397216 >>57397889 >>57398948 >>57402982 >>57406860
>>>/r/etards

>>57406909
on you mean that plus button, you get used to it honestly, i am its not that bad of a browser it has its ups and downs but its pretty good and fast for me. I would try it and see if you like it and switch if you want but its a good option from chrome and fire fox considering the fact its a former fire fox ceo who owns it.

>>57407028
I mean an option to have the tabs over the address bar instead of under it. I'm too use to tabs being on top to ever go back to them being on the bottom. I tried it a few months ago and that was a deal breaker for me. If they ever add the option I'll probably switch to it.

>>57407071
ok i gotcha but hey it might happen in 1.0 im pretty hyped for it. Have a good one anon

>>57398988
>not having enough resources to even handle chrome
poorfag

File: 1472807258390.png (327KB, 594x960px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 594x960px

>>57401581
>oppressed minority

>>57397461

I'm just gonna make use of this chance to brag that I can invert binary trees of up to 513 elements in my mind after only looking at the original tree for a minute.

>>57396982
You fuckers didn't even bother to read the article, the entire thing is one bulshit tirade about how they are changing the icon that notifies you whether a website is http or https. It has nothing to do with the security of chrome, I bet the people in the picture are not even involved in the technical implementation of what they are changing.

>>57402241
no because i wait twenting minutes before swimming after eating.

File: 1461736501625.gif (275KB, 463x426px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 463x426px

>>57402330
yeh but two of the are non gender binaries, one of them identifies as an 86 year old haitian medicine woman and the others fursona is a protoss praetorian.

>mfw our cannons shall sing

>>57396982
Is there something I should know about how https actually makes things LESS secure, since they seem so intent on forcing it?

>>57400975
>other people can know exactly what kind of URL I BROWSE

oh dear, https just obfuscates the content, your neighbor sharing your broadband can still see that you visit furryshotponey.com

https is necessary if you are submiting content so that you cant be identified by spectators, but its Not nedded at all if youre just browsing.


>>57401394
>Brave
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop
written in node.js HAHAHAHAHHHAHH

>>57407585
>homocide
hopefully you're a victim, gay

File: 1476308681644.png (167KB, 413x404px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 413x404px

>>57397280
>this
>which can range anywhere from a hacker sniffing passwords at the next Starbucks table
>the fuck?

>>57408089
Aww did I trigger your wittle feewings faggot?

File: Wired_Final_2-683x1024.jpg (54KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 683x1024px

I love big pregnant bellies and tits

File: anger.jpg (4KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 236x236px

>>57397452
>avoids billions in taxes worldwide
>"company's efforts to be a good citizen"
>uses $100 mil to "invest" for "social benefit"

You know, it is one thing when liberal companies showboat and talk about caring for the little people. I, and Im sure many people, would have much less hate for these "people" if they weren't so fucking hypocritical. Same thing with those living in gated and guarded neighborhoods telling us to suck it up and live with anyone and everyone they want to import into the country without background checks.

File: meg.png (117KB, 592x962px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 592x962px

>>57408211

As annoying as that article is, isn't getting rid of the padlock and replacing it with a "NOT SECURE" prompt a decent idea? I mean, especially for normies. Hell, I wish a browser would point out when the certificate hierarchy is out of the ordinary (not that I know how it'd know).

reminder that firefox had a malicious javascript bug that exposed milions of TOR users to FBI


Anyway, they all have masters degree's and doctorates involving Information technology/security so i dont see the problem with the skills involved. They most likely do a good job.


It's weird how there's PoC, male or female, for that matter. Hell, not even a white male.

>>57396982
calling bullshit behind that team is probably male security experts.

File: 25543345345.webm (657KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

657KB, 1280x720px

>>57407585
Delete this you racist!

>>57401581
>this is what down syndrome addled mouth breathers actually believe

What does the person have to do with it, if the quality is there?

But everyone has drank from the flavoraid that is google, that it wouldn't matter anyway. Hard to get away from it.

>>57408411
have they fixed it yet? Haven't had an update in debian for a while

>>57397072
>>57403753
what the fuck does that have to do with https?

google making https ubiquitous does not grant them any more intrusive access to your system, that is absurd.

>>57409139
google has already cracked RSA and that's why they want you to use https - so that *only* they can sniff your data

>>57409220
lol what raelly???

>>57409220
There's no polynomial time algorithm for breaking RSA you dumb fucking liberal arts nigger.

>>57396982
they don't write code. they flag websites for inappropriate content so that google chrome will warn that the site is bad

>>57409920
that you know of

google has been using CAPTCHA for several years - they probably have developed the algorithm with all the manpower for so many years

>>57405236
well done

>>57402241
Did you die your hair a mix of red and pink before or after you got a mohawk and 3 piercings

>>57397018
But what's the point of using that instead of Chrome if it has Sync?
And what's the point if it has no Sync?

>>57401394
Vivaldi then.

File: midori-LOGO1.png (10KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 256x256px

H..hi guys...

>2016
>not using ungoogled cromium with a few extensions like umatrix
>using lagfox
It's like you don't even browse internet, fucking ricers.

waterfox or bust

>>57397579
T-thick?

>>57397420
1v1 hack battle me m8 I have Java script to hack the shit out of you

File: jewing intensifies.gif (72KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 350x350px

>>57408211
Yes, good goy. Work when anyone else would be resting.

>>57400653

>nslookup www.fbi.com
>"fite me IRL my IP is (...)"
>idiot tries to ddos the IP
>gets v&
>profit

>>57411937

uhm, it's ".gov"..

>>57407640
Why are you bragging about being an autistic faggot?

Fix the browser, please.
White flashes when loading/switching tabs destroy my eyes.
It drives me insane.

>>57412135
upgrade your toaster

>>57397297
>being this retarded

>>57396982
>four white women

So this is the power of diversity...

>>57396982
>we taught a group of women how to click a button on a GUI application that automatically runs a battery of tests written by white men

Consider me diversified

>>57396982
>Firefox
lol
total botnet and buggy and slow as fuck

>>57402845
sudo apt install chromium

File: kek were had.jpg (7KB, 170x206px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 170x206px

>>57396982
>taking a google publicity stunt seriously
>shilling for firejews
>whole firecucks is full of SJWs and they've been shitting on the browser for the past 2 years

lol you are funny retarded friendo. Keep going.

>>57408272
this

>>57407585
>Winner of custody
The father will die at work, war, be murdered or just kill himself.

File: image.jpg (130KB, 1249x790px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1249x790px

>>57396982
>new chrome feature automatically blocks betas and let's you know when Chad is online

File: defence ministers.jpg (113KB, 600x1082px)

113KB, 600x1082px

Can't wait for hilabeast to start WWIII.

File: 14586755672331.jpg (149KB, 800x820px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 800x820px

>>57397181

>>57396982
tranny
possible tranny
dont think its a tranny
tranny

File: 20b02248-39ea-46ec-8e0b-7f4e71b5188b..jpg (178KB, 800x684px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 800x684px

fucking kill me

>>57422373
>For Tabriz's team, the mistaken assumption that an average person on the internet is not completely fucking retarded has come to represent a fundamental problem with modern browsers.

File: 116.jpg (10KB, 230x219px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 230x219px

>go to wired.com and click on a random article
>Five different fonts for one article

>>57408272
Based anon.

>>57407847
no for the moment it stops you getting fucked by by semi compotent script skiddies.

Holy shit, there's literally an article about making your "marijuana startup" prosper.
Fucking disgusting. How is mainstream media endorsing drugs?

> these women probably wipe their ass with microcorruption or overthewire
> but sure, /g/ probably knows more about web browser security than them

>>57403327
Except to download extensions you need a Microsoft Account. Trade one jewing for another.

>>57397452
>company
>charitable
toppest of keks

>>57426779
I'm not even logged in :^)

Extensions can still be side loaded :^^^))))

>>57396982
>very first sentence is about ordering matching clothing
stopped reading there

you gave me a good scare anon, but there's no way anyone would let any of...this...near anything so important as Google's golden botnet.

>>57400781
Offended? I just prefer competent developers over incompetent ones. Outside of liberal delusion land the facts of the gender dichotomy are quite clear. Women did not evolve to be programmers.