>buy a monitor with 5ms response time >compare it to my

Is it 144hz?

>>57380083
both are 60

>>57380090
You imbecile. More hz = smoother experience. It's night and day between 60 vs 144

considering average reaction time is something like 250ms, that's not surprising

What did you expect?
You can't notice it, it can possibly be only useful in things that require reflex response, i.e. fast paced video games.

>>57380040
silly loli

>>57380280
>loli

>>57380263
>250ms

When will this meme end?

>>57380040
pixel response time isn't as important as refresh rate or input latency. Pixel response time only affects motion blur or ghosting. Refresh rate affects smoothness and input latency is the delay between an input and a visible change on the screen.

>>57380040
You can see difference because you're not focusing. Even with testing you won't notice the difference unless you focus and use it for something else, such as "games"

>>57380339
Why is games in quotations?

Are you implying it's made up?

>>57380370
>implying "games" actually exist

>>57380333
This

File: Doki_New_Game_-_01_1280x720_h264_AAC_43C77D3E.mkv_snapshot_00.46_2016.07.05_00.59.25-700x385-1.jpg (48KB, 700x385px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 700x385px

>>57380317
aoba is an 18 year old DFC loli.

>>57380040
Were they truly this fast in G2G? I mean measurably so, not just what you read on manufacturer spec sheet. Higher refresh rate puts more emphasis on the pixel response times so on your 60 Hz monitor the response time of 14ms, while slow, is still enough for a relatively ghosting free transition for most imagery. What did you test it with? Are you very accustomed to playing some specific fast paced video game with rich colors and high contrast which would make ghosting easy to spot?

And no it's not a buzzword or marketing bullshit. Technologies like ULMB are pretty amazing too.

>>57380040
you can't because 60 fps is 16ms per frame
if both screens change color faster than that, there will be no difference.

If it were 144Hz, that would be 7ms and fast switching would help a lot

>>57381129
where did you get this picture of me

G2G specs are bullshit, manufacturers each make up their own standards for the test to get the lowest response time.

>>57381212
L
O
N
D
O
N

Remind me of this autistic at school who made us play Project M (another ssb melee mod for autistic children) on cathodic only because of this.
The fucker was right though.

You fell for the marketing
Kill yourself /v/ faggot

>>57380040
g2g response time is to reduce ghosting in games

>>57380040
>>57381129
slut

>>57381174
that's not how it works

inb4, naive OP trusts manufacturer specs.

>>57383766
manufac specs aren't usually egregiously wrong, maybe 2-4ms off from whats advertised
i have never seen anything 4+ms off from whats on the box

>>57380263
Not worth the investment if you only have a card capable of 60fps. It is a diminishing return and if you are comfortable with one setup, spending money on something you don't really need is pointless.

That being said, I think anything more than 8ms becomes noticeably not responsive, particularly for vidya.

File: 1472652295839.jpg (40KB, 431x420px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 431x420px

>>57381174
>60 fps is 16ms per frame
>if both screens change color faster than that, there will be no difference.
>If it were 144Hz, that would be 7ms and fast switching would help a lot