Its nice that you know all of those programming languages pretty much anybody could learn and master.
But can you dream in code?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBXZWB_dNsw
this has to stop
what the fuck keeps you making this thread over and over?
This will not become a meme and it's years old already
>>57377882
>++i
[TRIGGERED]
>naming your variable "count"
Friendly reminder >>57365198 >>57365735
>>57378470
why?
>>57378519
Unless I need the increment to parse first I always do i++, makes it easier to glance and see what variable is being incremented.
>>57378514
whats wrong with that?
>>57378854
index variables should be i,j,k etc.
>>57378879
Count isn't an index variable, it's the max number the index variable i can be
>>57378537
But i++ is slower.
>>57378913
It shouldn't be. Since in this context the semantics are identical, the compiler should be able to optimize it.
>>57377882
I was waiting for this, If you surround yourself in something for too long and start doing it daily you will see it reflected in your dreams. Example: If I watch tons of porn my dreams will be sexual as fuck. If I surround myself in programming and computers you bet your ass that's what I'm dreaming about. YMMV tho
Yes, actually. I also spend all day thinking about it. When I'm taking a shit I'm thinking about it. When I'm smoking I think about it.
>>57378913
Unless the language you're using does a short-circuit, they're equivalent speeds. One returns the value then increments it (two statements), the other increments it then returns it (two statements)
>>57377882
I dreamed in code once
It was JAVA and I didn't understand anything
>>57377882
I once dreamt in c+=. I was feeling strong and empowered long after my welfare check was spent.
>>57378974
>not dreaming in ++c
>>57377882
Isn't it normal to wake up with solutions to problems of yesterday? There's a saying in my country about how the night gives good advice
>>57379032
It is not normal, that means you are a genius. Have you checked this out with a professional?
>>57379630
They gave me a lamp to live in but I don't like it
>>57378922
>It shouldn't be
>shouldn't
So you play it safe by doing ++i then
>>57378929
>Unless the language you're using
>Unless
See above m80
>>57377882
STOP SPAMMING THIS SHIT THREAD IMBECILE