Why does JPG compression even exist, /g/? I mean, JPG's

>>57377536
It's almost like the internet existed before people had broadband. Even in the early broadband days loading several JPEGs wouldn't be instant like it is now.

>>57377536

Give respect where respect is due, you ungrateful cur. You know nothing of conceptualizing, developing, implementing and supporting a world-wide recognized image standard that has been unbelievably popular since inception.

Tsk, armchair "experts".

>>57377536
Photography. Idiots use it for everything though.

>>57378262
Photographers all shoot in RAW. Did you mean photography a decade ago when storage was tiny?

>>57378325
Yes. OP did ask why JPG exists.

And we making same mistake again.
Google forced shitty lossy webm meme while there are lost of good lossless formats

>>57378527
>video
>lossless
no, that's terrible

>>57378689
why?

10 years ago it was like
>images
>lossless
>no, that's terrible

All jpegs are compressed.

>>57379019
Uncompressed video is like five gigabytes per minute.

File: 0.jpg (11KB, 390x234px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 390x234px

It doesn't help that the average person doesn't know the difference between image formats and uploads compressed images through 3g/4g networks. The mobile network image compression results in a continual loss of photo quality.

>>57378527
Name ONE good lossless video compression format that reduces filesizes to a reasonable size.

>>57379301
>mobile network image compression

wtf they do that?

>>57378527
>Google forced shitty lossy webm meme while there are lost of good lossless formats
Do you know anything at all about video encoding?

>>57379019
even with lossy compression videos are still big, muh less so for images. we haven't had a successfull new image format because png and jpeg is good enough, the same can't be said about video

>>57379551
*much

>>57378527
And Hiro downgraded the 4chan servers so that even 500KB images take 30 seconds to load

What a time to be alive

File: 1746837159.gif (1001KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

1001KB, 640x480px

weakass dead beat niggas sittin in they homes with they fiberoptics an shit whil eerryone else on 4g

>>57379310
MSU codec.

>>57379551
>he doesn't mention H.264 i-frame

>>57379620
>successfull
>as in widely used

>>57379263
ever heard of lossless compression?

File: 1*LkwX1WehjR5bsXAe41JkBw.jpg (122KB, 800x771px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 800x771px

>>57379590

>>57379786
Are you shitting me? It's easily the most used video codec with the widest compatibility. We're not talking vp9. This is used across a huge number of verticals.

>>57379885
i meant image format, not video format. sure, video compression is still getting better and there is interest in new formats.

File: 1461174469942.jpg (74KB, 740x746px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 740x746px

>>57379590
>>57379866
>>57379872
if you up, please continue

File: 1*bGzpaLz6ujqdwNJZZDuOVg.png (544KB, 502x595px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 502x595px

>>57380024

Nice /b/ thread guys

>>57379866
>>57379872
>>57381290
>>57381334
>>57381343
>>57381810
>>57381821
>>57381828
>>57381854
>>57381866
America is a really weird country

File: 1455696706852.jpg (75KB, 800x813px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 800x813px

>>57381867
This thread is for discussing image formats, compression techniques, and generational degradation. Who up?

Can someone explain to an European what "nigger hours" are?

File: 1456384789499.jpg (835KB, 1259x807px) Image search: [Google]

835KB, 1259x807px

>>57381901
Around 2-5AM EST, it's the time when "real niggas" be up.

is it possible to stop android/disable image compressing on mobile? Somebody sends me a small video and it gets crushed down to 144p and looks so aids, same with gifs which don't send correctly at all.

>>57377536
>he never fapped to porn where it took 12 minutes for to its to be loaded line by line

>>57383253
>you are now reminded that this problem was addressed in a simpsons episode

>>57381878
that's not america, only african americans, on twitter.

>>57381948
the app does that, not "Android" lol

>>57379310
huffYUV

>>57379310
Lagarith

If you don't mind talking about video, why do people prefer .webm to .mp4? You can get, what, 2x higher resolution with mp4 for the same filesize.

>>57377536
For the same reason mp3s still exist despite how cheap storage is

>>57383854
>why do people prefer .webmeme
but they don't!

you literally can't upload any other on this site


and now Moot works in Google...

>>57383854
Much faster encoding and decoding too thanks to mature software and hardware acceleration. I think vp9 is competitive in regards to size though and vpx/webm as a whole is more appealing to me just because of the openness, I like knowing that you can use, implement, etc. in any way without worrying about legal concerns or royalty fees.

>>57383854
MP4 is encumbered by patents and incurs hidden license cost on hardware
VP9 is supposedly free as in freedom

>>57385578
s/MP4/H.264/

>>57379310
gentoo

>>57377536
One A. Hussie donated $2.4 mil. to the JPEG Group to keep it going.