>super ultra HD Is this a fucking joke? Supercharged twin-turbo

Nah man

Next year will be Super Ultra Turbo TV HD Remix. 2 years after that will be Supercharged Twin-Turbo V8 Megamix HD Extreme.

>>57337374
s is for samsung, genius

>>57337374
Well that looks like 21:9 to me.
UHD is defined as 3840 × 2160, right?
If you call this 21:9 screen UHD, it would be mislabeling.

>>57337414
this

File: superuhd.jpg (111KB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 720x404px

>>57337414
>s is for samsung, genius
You're the genius here, pal.

>>57337428
OPs picture is a samsung, majestic retard, and it does stand for Samsung.

>>57337374
it's just marketing wank for 8K, it's the same for 4K UHD and full HD for 1080

>>57337440
>a samsung
How I hate people referring to Samsung's products as "a samsung".
Are you seeing a whole company in that picture? Do you have "a samsung" in your pocket too? Man I'd love to have "a samsung".

File: Screenshot_2016-11-01_15-05-49.png (20KB, 757x135px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 757x135px

>>57337440
It actually doesn't stand for anything.

>>57337509

Same shit as "a Nintendo" or "an Apple".

It's pretty common nomenclature to refer to a product by the company that produced it. Unless you've been living under a rock since the 70s, it's quite strange that hearing those words triggers you that much.

File: 1252428085442.jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

>>57337509
yes, I also refer to a "Porsche car" as a "Porsche"

>>57337539
>when you get asked for "a samsung cable" but you only have a micro USB cable, so you say "nope, sorry"

>>57337509

Samesung quality is going to shit since they're trying to compete on pricing with the chink makers. Grabbing market share while sacrificing qualityLEDs.

I'd rather get an LG over samesung for the price nowadays.

>>57337560
LG also appears to be the only ones making actual OLED panels, and not some gimmicky regular LED variant.

File: china phone.jpg (105KB, 1226x602px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1226x602px

>>57337560
>Samesung quality is going to shit since they're trying to compete on pricing with the chink makers
Then how come actual chink makers make higher quality products than Samsung?
Samsung is just max jew and tries to make as much profit as possible, that's why they downgrade their quality to match a lower price.